And justice for all? Investigators' perceptions of punishment for fraud perpetrators

Kristy Reisig, Nicole Leeper Piquero, Alex R. Piquero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite extensive financial losses and other indicators of harm, the American public and legal professionals have historically been ambivalent toward white-collar crime. Recent research demonstrates that public perceptions of white-collar crime and attitudes toward the punishment of white-collar offenders have become more punitive. Along these lines, a neglected area of research concerns those individuals who routinely face white-collar crimes: fraud investigators. Using data collected during the height of recent corporate scandals (2001-02), this study examines the perceptions of 663 fraud investigators and extends prior research by considering the influence of investigator characteristics, organizational context (i.e., size, setting, internal controls, and resource capacity), case characteristics (i.e., offense type, financial loss, and sanction), and offender characteristics on legal professionals' general and specific punishment perceptions. Results indicate that organizational resources increase the likelihood of both outcomes. Additionally, the correlates of general and specific punishment perceptions are found to differ: government agency context influences general but not specific perceptions. Comparatively, the perception that fraud is increasing and a sanction that includes incarceration each have a significant, positive influence on specific punishment perceptions. Implications of these findings for future research and policy are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-412
Number of pages16
JournalCrime, Law and Social Change
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Fraud
Punishment
Social Justice
fraud
penalty
Crime
justice
Research Personnel
offense
Research
Government Agencies
sanction
offender
scandal
government agency
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

And justice for all? Investigators' perceptions of punishment for fraud perpetrators. / Reisig, Kristy; Piquero, Nicole Leeper; Piquero, Alex R.

In: Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 49, No. 5, 06.2008, p. 397-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reisig, Kristy ; Piquero, Nicole Leeper ; Piquero, Alex R. / And justice for all? Investigators' perceptions of punishment for fraud perpetrators. In: Crime, Law and Social Change. 2008 ; Vol. 49, No. 5. pp. 397-412.
@article{11f6661532b74595b5bb838f96933514,
title = "And justice for all? Investigators' perceptions of punishment for fraud perpetrators",
abstract = "Despite extensive financial losses and other indicators of harm, the American public and legal professionals have historically been ambivalent toward white-collar crime. Recent research demonstrates that public perceptions of white-collar crime and attitudes toward the punishment of white-collar offenders have become more punitive. Along these lines, a neglected area of research concerns those individuals who routinely face white-collar crimes: fraud investigators. Using data collected during the height of recent corporate scandals (2001-02), this study examines the perceptions of 663 fraud investigators and extends prior research by considering the influence of investigator characteristics, organizational context (i.e., size, setting, internal controls, and resource capacity), case characteristics (i.e., offense type, financial loss, and sanction), and offender characteristics on legal professionals' general and specific punishment perceptions. Results indicate that organizational resources increase the likelihood of both outcomes. Additionally, the correlates of general and specific punishment perceptions are found to differ: government agency context influences general but not specific perceptions. Comparatively, the perception that fraud is increasing and a sanction that includes incarceration each have a significant, positive influence on specific punishment perceptions. Implications of these findings for future research and policy are discussed.",
author = "Kristy Reisig and Piquero, {Nicole Leeper} and Piquero, {Alex R.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10611-008-9110-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "397--412",
journal = "Crime, Law and Social Change",
issn = "0925-4994",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - And justice for all? Investigators' perceptions of punishment for fraud perpetrators

AU - Reisig, Kristy

AU - Piquero, Nicole Leeper

AU - Piquero, Alex R.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Despite extensive financial losses and other indicators of harm, the American public and legal professionals have historically been ambivalent toward white-collar crime. Recent research demonstrates that public perceptions of white-collar crime and attitudes toward the punishment of white-collar offenders have become more punitive. Along these lines, a neglected area of research concerns those individuals who routinely face white-collar crimes: fraud investigators. Using data collected during the height of recent corporate scandals (2001-02), this study examines the perceptions of 663 fraud investigators and extends prior research by considering the influence of investigator characteristics, organizational context (i.e., size, setting, internal controls, and resource capacity), case characteristics (i.e., offense type, financial loss, and sanction), and offender characteristics on legal professionals' general and specific punishment perceptions. Results indicate that organizational resources increase the likelihood of both outcomes. Additionally, the correlates of general and specific punishment perceptions are found to differ: government agency context influences general but not specific perceptions. Comparatively, the perception that fraud is increasing and a sanction that includes incarceration each have a significant, positive influence on specific punishment perceptions. Implications of these findings for future research and policy are discussed.

AB - Despite extensive financial losses and other indicators of harm, the American public and legal professionals have historically been ambivalent toward white-collar crime. Recent research demonstrates that public perceptions of white-collar crime and attitudes toward the punishment of white-collar offenders have become more punitive. Along these lines, a neglected area of research concerns those individuals who routinely face white-collar crimes: fraud investigators. Using data collected during the height of recent corporate scandals (2001-02), this study examines the perceptions of 663 fraud investigators and extends prior research by considering the influence of investigator characteristics, organizational context (i.e., size, setting, internal controls, and resource capacity), case characteristics (i.e., offense type, financial loss, and sanction), and offender characteristics on legal professionals' general and specific punishment perceptions. Results indicate that organizational resources increase the likelihood of both outcomes. Additionally, the correlates of general and specific punishment perceptions are found to differ: government agency context influences general but not specific perceptions. Comparatively, the perception that fraud is increasing and a sanction that includes incarceration each have a significant, positive influence on specific punishment perceptions. Implications of these findings for future research and policy are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44149083269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44149083269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10611-008-9110-z

DO - 10.1007/s10611-008-9110-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:44149083269

VL - 49

SP - 397

EP - 412

JO - Crime, Law and Social Change

JF - Crime, Law and Social Change

SN - 0925-4994

IS - 5

ER -