Analysis of shifts in Student's reasoning regarding electric field and potential concepts

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Students' reasoning regarding the relationships among electric fields, forces, and equipotential line patterns was explored using pre-and post-test responses to selected multiple-choice questions on the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism. Students' written explanations of their reasoning, provided both pre-and post-instruction, allowed additional assessment of the changes in their thinking. In particular, the data indicate that although students largely abandon an initial tendency to associate stronger fields with wider equipotential line spacing, many of them persist in incorrectly associating electric field magnitude at a point with the electric potential at that point.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAIP Conference Proceedings
Pages177-180
Number of pages4
Volume883
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes
Event2006 Physics Education Research Conference, PERC 2006 - Syracuse, NY, United States
Duration: Jul 26 2006Jul 27 2006

Other

Other2006 Physics Education Research Conference, PERC 2006
CountryUnited States
CitySyracuse, NY
Period7/26/067/27/06

Fingerprint

students
equipotentials
electric fields
shift
electric potential
electricity
tendencies
education
spacing

Keywords

  • Electricity and magnetism
  • Physics education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Analysis of shifts in Student's reasoning regarding electric field and potential concepts. / Meltzer, David.

AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 883 2007. p. 177-180.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Meltzer, D 2007, Analysis of shifts in Student's reasoning regarding electric field and potential concepts. in AIP Conference Proceedings. vol. 883, pp. 177-180, 2006 Physics Education Research Conference, PERC 2006, Syracuse, NY, United States, 7/26/06. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508721
@inproceedings{e0efb38be55c4676a5083d781c3bf456,
title = "Analysis of shifts in Student's reasoning regarding electric field and potential concepts",
abstract = "Students' reasoning regarding the relationships among electric fields, forces, and equipotential line patterns was explored using pre-and post-test responses to selected multiple-choice questions on the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism. Students' written explanations of their reasoning, provided both pre-and post-instruction, allowed additional assessment of the changes in their thinking. In particular, the data indicate that although students largely abandon an initial tendency to associate stronger fields with wider equipotential line spacing, many of them persist in incorrectly associating electric field magnitude at a point with the electric potential at that point.",
keywords = "Electricity and magnetism, Physics education",
author = "David Meltzer",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1063/1.2508721",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780735403833",
volume = "883",
pages = "177--180",
booktitle = "AIP Conference Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Analysis of shifts in Student's reasoning regarding electric field and potential concepts

AU - Meltzer, David

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Students' reasoning regarding the relationships among electric fields, forces, and equipotential line patterns was explored using pre-and post-test responses to selected multiple-choice questions on the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism. Students' written explanations of their reasoning, provided both pre-and post-instruction, allowed additional assessment of the changes in their thinking. In particular, the data indicate that although students largely abandon an initial tendency to associate stronger fields with wider equipotential line spacing, many of them persist in incorrectly associating electric field magnitude at a point with the electric potential at that point.

AB - Students' reasoning regarding the relationships among electric fields, forces, and equipotential line patterns was explored using pre-and post-test responses to selected multiple-choice questions on the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism. Students' written explanations of their reasoning, provided both pre-and post-instruction, allowed additional assessment of the changes in their thinking. In particular, the data indicate that although students largely abandon an initial tendency to associate stronger fields with wider equipotential line spacing, many of them persist in incorrectly associating electric field magnitude at a point with the electric potential at that point.

KW - Electricity and magnetism

KW - Physics education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957990434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957990434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.2508721

DO - 10.1063/1.2508721

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780735403833

VL - 883

SP - 177

EP - 180

BT - AIP Conference Proceedings

ER -