An inferential/strategic explanation for the social organisation of teases

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous work on teasing has examined the surface features of teasing interactions and has suggested that responses to teases are generally serious and are so because of the negative characterisations which are inherent in teases. The present study uses an inferential/strategic model for examining the social organisation of teases. Based on this analysis, it is argued that tease responses are formulated on the basis of the recipient's interpretation of the teaser's goal. It is claimed that tease recipients attempt to interpret the teaser's goal based on multiple clues to meaning. This interpretation then informs the type of response the recipient is likely to make: serious, humorous, or mixed. An analysis of teasing episodes revealed that there are three sources for clues to meaning: background knowledge, communciation content, and paralinguistic cues. This analysis attempts to provide a more encompassing explanation for the social organisation of teases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-177
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Language and Social Psychology
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

recipient
Cues
interpretation
interaction
Social Organization
Recipient
Teasing
Background Knowledge
Paralinguistics
Interaction
Encompassing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

An inferential/strategic explanation for the social organisation of teases. / Alberts, Janet.

In: Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.01.1992, p. 153-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47b62843d28e41c4bfd06a14d1b081f6,
title = "An inferential/strategic explanation for the social organisation of teases",
abstract = "Previous work on teasing has examined the surface features of teasing interactions and has suggested that responses to teases are generally serious and are so because of the negative characterisations which are inherent in teases. The present study uses an inferential/strategic model for examining the social organisation of teases. Based on this analysis, it is argued that tease responses are formulated on the basis of the recipient's interpretation of the teaser's goal. It is claimed that tease recipients attempt to interpret the teaser's goal based on multiple clues to meaning. This interpretation then informs the type of response the recipient is likely to make: serious, humorous, or mixed. An analysis of teasing episodes revealed that there are three sources for clues to meaning: background knowledge, communciation content, and paralinguistic cues. This analysis attempts to provide a more encompassing explanation for the social organisation of teases.",
author = "Janet Alberts",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0261927X92113003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "153--177",
journal = "Journal of Language and Social Psychology",
issn = "0261-927X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An inferential/strategic explanation for the social organisation of teases

AU - Alberts, Janet

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Previous work on teasing has examined the surface features of teasing interactions and has suggested that responses to teases are generally serious and are so because of the negative characterisations which are inherent in teases. The present study uses an inferential/strategic model for examining the social organisation of teases. Based on this analysis, it is argued that tease responses are formulated on the basis of the recipient's interpretation of the teaser's goal. It is claimed that tease recipients attempt to interpret the teaser's goal based on multiple clues to meaning. This interpretation then informs the type of response the recipient is likely to make: serious, humorous, or mixed. An analysis of teasing episodes revealed that there are three sources for clues to meaning: background knowledge, communciation content, and paralinguistic cues. This analysis attempts to provide a more encompassing explanation for the social organisation of teases.

AB - Previous work on teasing has examined the surface features of teasing interactions and has suggested that responses to teases are generally serious and are so because of the negative characterisations which are inherent in teases. The present study uses an inferential/strategic model for examining the social organisation of teases. Based on this analysis, it is argued that tease responses are formulated on the basis of the recipient's interpretation of the teaser's goal. It is claimed that tease recipients attempt to interpret the teaser's goal based on multiple clues to meaning. This interpretation then informs the type of response the recipient is likely to make: serious, humorous, or mixed. An analysis of teasing episodes revealed that there are three sources for clues to meaning: background knowledge, communciation content, and paralinguistic cues. This analysis attempts to provide a more encompassing explanation for the social organisation of teases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001158982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001158982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0261927X92113003

DO - 10.1177/0261927X92113003

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 153

EP - 177

JO - Journal of Language and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Language and Social Psychology

SN - 0261-927X

IS - 3

ER -