Ambivalence in organizations

A multilevel approach

Blake Ashforth, Kristie M. Rogers, Michael G. Pratt, Camille Pradies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The experience of simultaneously positive and negative orientations toward a person, goal, task, idea, and such appears to be quite common in organizations, but it is poorly understood. We develop a multilevel perspective on ambivalence in organizations that demonstrates how this phenomenon is integral to certain cognitive and emotional processes and important outcomes. Specifically, we discuss the organizational triggers of ambivalence and the cognitive and emotional mechanisms through which ambivalence diffuses between the individual and collective levels of analysis. We offer an integrative framework of major responses to highly intense ambivalence (avoidance, domination, compromise, and holism) that is applicable to actors at the individual and collective levels. The positive and negative outcomes associated with each response, and the conditions under which each is most effective, are explored. Although ambivalence is uncomfortable for actors, it has the potential to foster growth in the actor as well as highly adaptive and effective behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1453-1478
Number of pages26
JournalOrganization Science
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Multilevel approach
Ambivalence
Emotion
Trigger
Domination
Levels of analysis
Multi-level perspective
Holism
Integral
Compromise
Avoidance

Keywords

  • Ambivalence
  • Avoidance
  • Compromise
  • Coping mechanisms
  • Defense mechanisms
  • Domination
  • Dualities
  • Emotional contagion
  • Holism
  • Hybrid identities
  • Multilevel
  • Paradox
  • Role conflicts
  • Sensegiving
  • Sensemaking
  • Wisdom

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Ambivalence in organizations : A multilevel approach. / Ashforth, Blake; Rogers, Kristie M.; Pratt, Michael G.; Pradies, Camille.

In: Organization Science, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2014, p. 1453-1478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ashforth, B, Rogers, KM, Pratt, MG & Pradies, C 2014, 'Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach', Organization Science, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1453-1478. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0909
Ashforth, Blake ; Rogers, Kristie M. ; Pratt, Michael G. ; Pradies, Camille. / Ambivalence in organizations : A multilevel approach. In: Organization Science. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 1453-1478.
@article{c1780825ca724dfdbd1b5260d302f5cc,
title = "Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach",
abstract = "The experience of simultaneously positive and negative orientations toward a person, goal, task, idea, and such appears to be quite common in organizations, but it is poorly understood. We develop a multilevel perspective on ambivalence in organizations that demonstrates how this phenomenon is integral to certain cognitive and emotional processes and important outcomes. Specifically, we discuss the organizational triggers of ambivalence and the cognitive and emotional mechanisms through which ambivalence diffuses between the individual and collective levels of analysis. We offer an integrative framework of major responses to highly intense ambivalence (avoidance, domination, compromise, and holism) that is applicable to actors at the individual and collective levels. The positive and negative outcomes associated with each response, and the conditions under which each is most effective, are explored. Although ambivalence is uncomfortable for actors, it has the potential to foster growth in the actor as well as highly adaptive and effective behavior.",
keywords = "Ambivalence, Avoidance, Compromise, Coping mechanisms, Defense mechanisms, Domination, Dualities, Emotional contagion, Holism, Hybrid identities, Multilevel, Paradox, Role conflicts, Sensegiving, Sensemaking, Wisdom",
author = "Blake Ashforth and Rogers, {Kristie M.} and Pratt, {Michael G.} and Camille Pradies",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1287/orsc.2014.0909",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1453--1478",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambivalence in organizations

T2 - A multilevel approach

AU - Ashforth, Blake

AU - Rogers, Kristie M.

AU - Pratt, Michael G.

AU - Pradies, Camille

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The experience of simultaneously positive and negative orientations toward a person, goal, task, idea, and such appears to be quite common in organizations, but it is poorly understood. We develop a multilevel perspective on ambivalence in organizations that demonstrates how this phenomenon is integral to certain cognitive and emotional processes and important outcomes. Specifically, we discuss the organizational triggers of ambivalence and the cognitive and emotional mechanisms through which ambivalence diffuses between the individual and collective levels of analysis. We offer an integrative framework of major responses to highly intense ambivalence (avoidance, domination, compromise, and holism) that is applicable to actors at the individual and collective levels. The positive and negative outcomes associated with each response, and the conditions under which each is most effective, are explored. Although ambivalence is uncomfortable for actors, it has the potential to foster growth in the actor as well as highly adaptive and effective behavior.

AB - The experience of simultaneously positive and negative orientations toward a person, goal, task, idea, and such appears to be quite common in organizations, but it is poorly understood. We develop a multilevel perspective on ambivalence in organizations that demonstrates how this phenomenon is integral to certain cognitive and emotional processes and important outcomes. Specifically, we discuss the organizational triggers of ambivalence and the cognitive and emotional mechanisms through which ambivalence diffuses between the individual and collective levels of analysis. We offer an integrative framework of major responses to highly intense ambivalence (avoidance, domination, compromise, and holism) that is applicable to actors at the individual and collective levels. The positive and negative outcomes associated with each response, and the conditions under which each is most effective, are explored. Although ambivalence is uncomfortable for actors, it has the potential to foster growth in the actor as well as highly adaptive and effective behavior.

KW - Ambivalence

KW - Avoidance

KW - Compromise

KW - Coping mechanisms

KW - Defense mechanisms

KW - Domination

KW - Dualities

KW - Emotional contagion

KW - Holism

KW - Hybrid identities

KW - Multilevel

KW - Paradox

KW - Role conflicts

KW - Sensegiving

KW - Sensemaking

KW - Wisdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905749387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905749387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/orsc.2014.0909

DO - 10.1287/orsc.2014.0909

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1453

EP - 1478

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 5

ER -