Aligning key concepts for global change policy

Robustness, resilience, and sustainability

John Anderies, Carl Folke, Brian Walker, Elinor Ostrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Globalization, the process by which local social-ecological systems (SESs) are becoming linked in a global network, presents policy scientists and practitioners with unique and difficult challenges. Although local SESs can be extremely complex, when they become more tightly linked in the global system, complexity increases very rapidly as multi-scale and multi-level processes become more important. Here, we argue that addressing these multi-scale and multi-level challenges requires a collection of theories and models. We suggest that the conceptual domains of sustainability, resilience, and robustness provide a sufficiently rich collection of theories and models, but overlapping definitions and confusion about how these conceptual domains articulate with one another reduces their utility. We attempt to eliminate this confusion and illustrate how sustainability, resilience, and robustness can be used in tandem to address the multi-scale and multi-level challenges associated with global change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number8
JournalEcology and Society
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

global change
sustainability
globalization
policy

Keywords

  • Fragility
  • Global change
  • Governance
  • Institutions
  • Resilience
  • Robustness
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Aligning key concepts for global change policy : Robustness, resilience, and sustainability. / Anderies, John; Folke, Carl; Walker, Brian; Ostrom, Elinor.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, 8, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f7306cc167941b692cc980d661bd03d,
title = "Aligning key concepts for global change policy: Robustness, resilience, and sustainability",
abstract = "Globalization, the process by which local social-ecological systems (SESs) are becoming linked in a global network, presents policy scientists and practitioners with unique and difficult challenges. Although local SESs can be extremely complex, when they become more tightly linked in the global system, complexity increases very rapidly as multi-scale and multi-level processes become more important. Here, we argue that addressing these multi-scale and multi-level challenges requires a collection of theories and models. We suggest that the conceptual domains of sustainability, resilience, and robustness provide a sufficiently rich collection of theories and models, but overlapping definitions and confusion about how these conceptual domains articulate with one another reduces their utility. We attempt to eliminate this confusion and illustrate how sustainability, resilience, and robustness can be used in tandem to address the multi-scale and multi-level challenges associated with global change.",
keywords = "Fragility, Global change, Governance, Institutions, Resilience, Robustness, Sustainability",
author = "John Anderies and Carl Folke and Brian Walker and Elinor Ostrom",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.5751/ES-05178-180208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning key concepts for global change policy

T2 - Robustness, resilience, and sustainability

AU - Anderies, John

AU - Folke, Carl

AU - Walker, Brian

AU - Ostrom, Elinor

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Globalization, the process by which local social-ecological systems (SESs) are becoming linked in a global network, presents policy scientists and practitioners with unique and difficult challenges. Although local SESs can be extremely complex, when they become more tightly linked in the global system, complexity increases very rapidly as multi-scale and multi-level processes become more important. Here, we argue that addressing these multi-scale and multi-level challenges requires a collection of theories and models. We suggest that the conceptual domains of sustainability, resilience, and robustness provide a sufficiently rich collection of theories and models, but overlapping definitions and confusion about how these conceptual domains articulate with one another reduces their utility. We attempt to eliminate this confusion and illustrate how sustainability, resilience, and robustness can be used in tandem to address the multi-scale and multi-level challenges associated with global change.

AB - Globalization, the process by which local social-ecological systems (SESs) are becoming linked in a global network, presents policy scientists and practitioners with unique and difficult challenges. Although local SESs can be extremely complex, when they become more tightly linked in the global system, complexity increases very rapidly as multi-scale and multi-level processes become more important. Here, we argue that addressing these multi-scale and multi-level challenges requires a collection of theories and models. We suggest that the conceptual domains of sustainability, resilience, and robustness provide a sufficiently rich collection of theories and models, but overlapping definitions and confusion about how these conceptual domains articulate with one another reduces their utility. We attempt to eliminate this confusion and illustrate how sustainability, resilience, and robustness can be used in tandem to address the multi-scale and multi-level challenges associated with global change.

KW - Fragility

KW - Global change

KW - Governance

KW - Institutions

KW - Resilience

KW - Robustness

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877341089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877341089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-05178-180208

DO - 10.5751/ES-05178-180208

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 2

M1 - 8

ER -