Aggregation issues in cognitive mapping

Robert M. Kitchin, Stewart Fotheringham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cognitive mapping involves the description of the way individuals store and process geographic information. Typically, cognitive mapping data are derived from individual responses and then analyzed in one of three ways: (1) the individual data sets are analyzed separately and only pooled for comparison (disaggregation); (2) the individual data sets are averaged and then analyzed (collective aggregation); or (3) the individual data sets are analyzed and the results averaged (individual aggregation). This paper compares the latter two aggregation strategies for analyzing cognitive mapping data using data collected in a large-scale study of students' configurational knowledge of the city of Swansea in the United Kingdom. It is contended that the aggregation strategy adopted will have a fundamental effect upon the conclusions drawn from a study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-280
Number of pages12
JournalProfessional Geographer
Volume49
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

aggregation
disaggregation
information process
student
knowledge

Keywords

  • Aggregation
  • Cognitive mapping
  • Ecological fallacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Aggregation issues in cognitive mapping. / Kitchin, Robert M.; Fotheringham, Stewart.

In: Professional Geographer, Vol. 49, No. 3, 08.1997, p. 269-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kitchin, Robert M. ; Fotheringham, Stewart. / Aggregation issues in cognitive mapping. In: Professional Geographer. 1997 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. pp. 269-280.
@article{36ae33fa4b5541f3bdbb52c7a0b1c93f,
title = "Aggregation issues in cognitive mapping",
abstract = "Cognitive mapping involves the description of the way individuals store and process geographic information. Typically, cognitive mapping data are derived from individual responses and then analyzed in one of three ways: (1) the individual data sets are analyzed separately and only pooled for comparison (disaggregation); (2) the individual data sets are averaged and then analyzed (collective aggregation); or (3) the individual data sets are analyzed and the results averaged (individual aggregation). This paper compares the latter two aggregation strategies for analyzing cognitive mapping data using data collected in a large-scale study of students' configurational knowledge of the city of Swansea in the United Kingdom. It is contended that the aggregation strategy adopted will have a fundamental effect upon the conclusions drawn from a study.",
keywords = "Aggregation, Cognitive mapping, Ecological fallacy",
author = "Kitchin, {Robert M.} and Stewart Fotheringham",
year = "1997",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "269--280",
journal = "Professional Geographer",
issn = "0033-0124",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aggregation issues in cognitive mapping

AU - Kitchin, Robert M.

AU - Fotheringham, Stewart

PY - 1997/8

Y1 - 1997/8

N2 - Cognitive mapping involves the description of the way individuals store and process geographic information. Typically, cognitive mapping data are derived from individual responses and then analyzed in one of three ways: (1) the individual data sets are analyzed separately and only pooled for comparison (disaggregation); (2) the individual data sets are averaged and then analyzed (collective aggregation); or (3) the individual data sets are analyzed and the results averaged (individual aggregation). This paper compares the latter two aggregation strategies for analyzing cognitive mapping data using data collected in a large-scale study of students' configurational knowledge of the city of Swansea in the United Kingdom. It is contended that the aggregation strategy adopted will have a fundamental effect upon the conclusions drawn from a study.

AB - Cognitive mapping involves the description of the way individuals store and process geographic information. Typically, cognitive mapping data are derived from individual responses and then analyzed in one of three ways: (1) the individual data sets are analyzed separately and only pooled for comparison (disaggregation); (2) the individual data sets are averaged and then analyzed (collective aggregation); or (3) the individual data sets are analyzed and the results averaged (individual aggregation). This paper compares the latter two aggregation strategies for analyzing cognitive mapping data using data collected in a large-scale study of students' configurational knowledge of the city of Swansea in the United Kingdom. It is contended that the aggregation strategy adopted will have a fundamental effect upon the conclusions drawn from a study.

KW - Aggregation

KW - Cognitive mapping

KW - Ecological fallacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0008318655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0008318655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0008318655

VL - 49

SP - 269

EP - 280

JO - Professional Geographer

JF - Professional Geographer

SN - 0033-0124

IS - 3

ER -