Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium

François Bréchignac, Deborah Oughton, Claire Mays, Lawrence Barnthouse, James C. Beasley, Andrea Bonisoli-Alquati, Clare Bradshaw, Justin Brown, Stéphane Dray, Stanislav Geras'kin, Travis Glenn, Kathy Higley, Ken Ishida, Lawrence Kapustka, Ulrik Kautsky, Wendy Kuhne, Michael Lynch, Tapio Mappes, Steve Mihok, Anders P. MøllerCarmel Mothersill, Timothy A. Mousseau, Joji Otaki, Evgeny Pryakhin, Olin E. Rhodes, Brit Salbu, Per Strand, Hirofumi Tsukada

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reports the output of a consensus symposium organized by the International Union of Radioecology in November 2015. The symposium gathered an academically diverse group of 30 scientists to consider the still debated ecological impact of radiation on populations and ecosystems. Stimulated by the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters' accidental contamination of the environment, there is increasing interest in developing environmental radiation protection frameworks. Scientific research conducted in a variety of laboratory and field settings has improved our knowledge of the effects of ionizing radiation on the environment. However, the results from such studies sometimes appear contradictory and there is disagreement about the implications for risk assessment. The Symposium discussions therefore focused on issues that might lead to different interpretations of the results, such as laboratory versus field approaches, organism versus population and ecosystemic inference strategies, dose estimation approaches and their significance under chronic exposure conditions. The participating scientists, from across the spectrum of disciplines and research areas, extending also beyond the traditional radioecology community, successfully developed a constructive spirit directed at understanding discrepancies. From the discussions, the group has derived seven consensus statements related to environmental protection against radiation, which are supplemented with some recommendations. Each of these statements is contextualized and discussed in view of contributing to the orientation and integration of future research, the results of which should yield better consensus on the ecological impact of radiation and consolidate suitable approaches for efficient radiological protection of the environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-29
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Environmental Radioactivity
Volume158-159
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiation Effects
Ecosystems
Ecosystem
Conservation of Natural Resources
ecological impact
Radiation
ecosystem
Population
Radiation protection
Radiation Protection
Ionizing radiation
Disasters
Environmental protection
Ionizing Radiation
Research
Risk assessment
disaster
environmental protection
risk assessment
Contamination

Keywords

  • Consensus development
  • Ecological risk assessment
  • Ecosystems
  • Environmental protection
  • Populations
  • Radiation effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation : Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium. / Bréchignac, François; Oughton, Deborah; Mays, Claire; Barnthouse, Lawrence; Beasley, James C.; Bonisoli-Alquati, Andrea; Bradshaw, Clare; Brown, Justin; Dray, Stéphane; Geras'kin, Stanislav; Glenn, Travis; Higley, Kathy; Ishida, Ken; Kapustka, Lawrence; Kautsky, Ulrik; Kuhne, Wendy; Lynch, Michael; Mappes, Tapio; Mihok, Steve; Møller, Anders P.; Mothersill, Carmel; Mousseau, Timothy A.; Otaki, Joji; Pryakhin, Evgeny; Rhodes, Olin E.; Salbu, Brit; Strand, Per; Tsukada, Hirofumi.

In: Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, Vol. 158-159, 01.07.2016, p. 21-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Bréchignac, F, Oughton, D, Mays, C, Barnthouse, L, Beasley, JC, Bonisoli-Alquati, A, Bradshaw, C, Brown, J, Dray, S, Geras'kin, S, Glenn, T, Higley, K, Ishida, K, Kapustka, L, Kautsky, U, Kuhne, W, Lynch, M, Mappes, T, Mihok, S, Møller, AP, Mothersill, C, Mousseau, TA, Otaki, J, Pryakhin, E, Rhodes, OE, Salbu, B, Strand, P & Tsukada, H 2016, 'Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium', Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 158-159, pp. 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.03.021
Bréchignac, François ; Oughton, Deborah ; Mays, Claire ; Barnthouse, Lawrence ; Beasley, James C. ; Bonisoli-Alquati, Andrea ; Bradshaw, Clare ; Brown, Justin ; Dray, Stéphane ; Geras'kin, Stanislav ; Glenn, Travis ; Higley, Kathy ; Ishida, Ken ; Kapustka, Lawrence ; Kautsky, Ulrik ; Kuhne, Wendy ; Lynch, Michael ; Mappes, Tapio ; Mihok, Steve ; Møller, Anders P. ; Mothersill, Carmel ; Mousseau, Timothy A. ; Otaki, Joji ; Pryakhin, Evgeny ; Rhodes, Olin E. ; Salbu, Brit ; Strand, Per ; Tsukada, Hirofumi. / Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation : Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium. In: Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2016 ; Vol. 158-159. pp. 21-29.
@article{2d8f386ced9c467fb881cca48b3b7b08,
title = "Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium",
abstract = "This paper reports the output of a consensus symposium organized by the International Union of Radioecology in November 2015. The symposium gathered an academically diverse group of 30 scientists to consider the still debated ecological impact of radiation on populations and ecosystems. Stimulated by the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters' accidental contamination of the environment, there is increasing interest in developing environmental radiation protection frameworks. Scientific research conducted in a variety of laboratory and field settings has improved our knowledge of the effects of ionizing radiation on the environment. However, the results from such studies sometimes appear contradictory and there is disagreement about the implications for risk assessment. The Symposium discussions therefore focused on issues that might lead to different interpretations of the results, such as laboratory versus field approaches, organism versus population and ecosystemic inference strategies, dose estimation approaches and their significance under chronic exposure conditions. The participating scientists, from across the spectrum of disciplines and research areas, extending also beyond the traditional radioecology community, successfully developed a constructive spirit directed at understanding discrepancies. From the discussions, the group has derived seven consensus statements related to environmental protection against radiation, which are supplemented with some recommendations. Each of these statements is contextualized and discussed in view of contributing to the orientation and integration of future research, the results of which should yield better consensus on the ecological impact of radiation and consolidate suitable approaches for efficient radiological protection of the environment.",
keywords = "Consensus development, Ecological risk assessment, Ecosystems, Environmental protection, Populations, Radiation effects",
author = "Fran{\cc}ois Br{\'e}chignac and Deborah Oughton and Claire Mays and Lawrence Barnthouse and Beasley, {James C.} and Andrea Bonisoli-Alquati and Clare Bradshaw and Justin Brown and St{\'e}phane Dray and Stanislav Geras'kin and Travis Glenn and Kathy Higley and Ken Ishida and Lawrence Kapustka and Ulrik Kautsky and Wendy Kuhne and Michael Lynch and Tapio Mappes and Steve Mihok and M{\o}ller, {Anders P.} and Carmel Mothersill and Mousseau, {Timothy A.} and Joji Otaki and Evgeny Pryakhin and Rhodes, {Olin E.} and Brit Salbu and Per Strand and Hirofumi Tsukada",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.03.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158-159",
pages = "21--29",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Radioactivity",
issn = "0265-931X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation

T2 - Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium

AU - Bréchignac, François

AU - Oughton, Deborah

AU - Mays, Claire

AU - Barnthouse, Lawrence

AU - Beasley, James C.

AU - Bonisoli-Alquati, Andrea

AU - Bradshaw, Clare

AU - Brown, Justin

AU - Dray, Stéphane

AU - Geras'kin, Stanislav

AU - Glenn, Travis

AU - Higley, Kathy

AU - Ishida, Ken

AU - Kapustka, Lawrence

AU - Kautsky, Ulrik

AU - Kuhne, Wendy

AU - Lynch, Michael

AU - Mappes, Tapio

AU - Mihok, Steve

AU - Møller, Anders P.

AU - Mothersill, Carmel

AU - Mousseau, Timothy A.

AU - Otaki, Joji

AU - Pryakhin, Evgeny

AU - Rhodes, Olin E.

AU - Salbu, Brit

AU - Strand, Per

AU - Tsukada, Hirofumi

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - This paper reports the output of a consensus symposium organized by the International Union of Radioecology in November 2015. The symposium gathered an academically diverse group of 30 scientists to consider the still debated ecological impact of radiation on populations and ecosystems. Stimulated by the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters' accidental contamination of the environment, there is increasing interest in developing environmental radiation protection frameworks. Scientific research conducted in a variety of laboratory and field settings has improved our knowledge of the effects of ionizing radiation on the environment. However, the results from such studies sometimes appear contradictory and there is disagreement about the implications for risk assessment. The Symposium discussions therefore focused on issues that might lead to different interpretations of the results, such as laboratory versus field approaches, organism versus population and ecosystemic inference strategies, dose estimation approaches and their significance under chronic exposure conditions. The participating scientists, from across the spectrum of disciplines and research areas, extending also beyond the traditional radioecology community, successfully developed a constructive spirit directed at understanding discrepancies. From the discussions, the group has derived seven consensus statements related to environmental protection against radiation, which are supplemented with some recommendations. Each of these statements is contextualized and discussed in view of contributing to the orientation and integration of future research, the results of which should yield better consensus on the ecological impact of radiation and consolidate suitable approaches for efficient radiological protection of the environment.

AB - This paper reports the output of a consensus symposium organized by the International Union of Radioecology in November 2015. The symposium gathered an academically diverse group of 30 scientists to consider the still debated ecological impact of radiation on populations and ecosystems. Stimulated by the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters' accidental contamination of the environment, there is increasing interest in developing environmental radiation protection frameworks. Scientific research conducted in a variety of laboratory and field settings has improved our knowledge of the effects of ionizing radiation on the environment. However, the results from such studies sometimes appear contradictory and there is disagreement about the implications for risk assessment. The Symposium discussions therefore focused on issues that might lead to different interpretations of the results, such as laboratory versus field approaches, organism versus population and ecosystemic inference strategies, dose estimation approaches and their significance under chronic exposure conditions. The participating scientists, from across the spectrum of disciplines and research areas, extending also beyond the traditional radioecology community, successfully developed a constructive spirit directed at understanding discrepancies. From the discussions, the group has derived seven consensus statements related to environmental protection against radiation, which are supplemented with some recommendations. Each of these statements is contextualized and discussed in view of contributing to the orientation and integration of future research, the results of which should yield better consensus on the ecological impact of radiation and consolidate suitable approaches for efficient radiological protection of the environment.

KW - Consensus development

KW - Ecological risk assessment

KW - Ecosystems

KW - Environmental protection

KW - Populations

KW - Radiation effects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962173272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962173272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.03.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.03.021

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27058410

AN - SCOPUS:84962173272

VL - 158-159

SP - 21

EP - 29

JO - Journal of Environmental Radioactivity

JF - Journal of Environmental Radioactivity

SN - 0265-931X

ER -