Activists and conflict extension in American party politics

Geoffrey C. Layman, Thomas M. Carsey, John C. Green, Richard Herrera, Rosalyn Cooperman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

138 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Party activists have played a leading role in conflict extensionthe polarization of the parties along multiple issue dimensionsin contemporary American politics. We argue that open nomination systems and the ambitious politicians competing within those systems encourage activists with extreme views on a variety of issue dimensions to become involved in party politics, thus motivating candidates to take noncentrist positions on a range of issues. Once that happens, continuing activists with strong partisan commitments bring their views into line with the new candidate agendas, thus extending the domain of interparty conflict. Using cross-sectional and panel surveys of national convention delegates, we find clear evidence for conflict extension among party activists, evidence tentatively suggesting a leading role for activists in partisan conflict extension more generally, and strong support for our argument about change among continuing activists. Issue conversion among activists has contributed substantially to conflict extension and party commitment has played a key role in motivating that conversion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-346
Number of pages23
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

party politics
candidacy
commitment
polarization
evidence
politician
politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Activists and conflict extension in American party politics. / Layman, Geoffrey C.; Carsey, Thomas M.; Green, John C.; Herrera, Richard; Cooperman, Rosalyn.

In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 104, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 324-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Layman, Geoffrey C. ; Carsey, Thomas M. ; Green, John C. ; Herrera, Richard ; Cooperman, Rosalyn. / Activists and conflict extension in American party politics. In: American Political Science Review. 2010 ; Vol. 104, No. 2. pp. 324-346.
@article{b080e5631724425ba5dc8d88e88ce9af,
title = "Activists and conflict extension in American party politics",
abstract = "Party activists have played a leading role in conflict extensionthe polarization of the parties along multiple issue dimensionsin contemporary American politics. We argue that open nomination systems and the ambitious politicians competing within those systems encourage activists with extreme views on a variety of issue dimensions to become involved in party politics, thus motivating candidates to take noncentrist positions on a range of issues. Once that happens, continuing activists with strong partisan commitments bring their views into line with the new candidate agendas, thus extending the domain of interparty conflict. Using cross-sectional and panel surveys of national convention delegates, we find clear evidence for conflict extension among party activists, evidence tentatively suggesting a leading role for activists in partisan conflict extension more generally, and strong support for our argument about change among continuing activists. Issue conversion among activists has contributed substantially to conflict extension and party commitment has played a key role in motivating that conversion.",
author = "Layman, {Geoffrey C.} and Carsey, {Thomas M.} and Green, {John C.} and Richard Herrera and Rosalyn Cooperman",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1017/S000305541000016X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "324--346",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Activists and conflict extension in American party politics

AU - Layman, Geoffrey C.

AU - Carsey, Thomas M.

AU - Green, John C.

AU - Herrera, Richard

AU - Cooperman, Rosalyn

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Party activists have played a leading role in conflict extensionthe polarization of the parties along multiple issue dimensionsin contemporary American politics. We argue that open nomination systems and the ambitious politicians competing within those systems encourage activists with extreme views on a variety of issue dimensions to become involved in party politics, thus motivating candidates to take noncentrist positions on a range of issues. Once that happens, continuing activists with strong partisan commitments bring their views into line with the new candidate agendas, thus extending the domain of interparty conflict. Using cross-sectional and panel surveys of national convention delegates, we find clear evidence for conflict extension among party activists, evidence tentatively suggesting a leading role for activists in partisan conflict extension more generally, and strong support for our argument about change among continuing activists. Issue conversion among activists has contributed substantially to conflict extension and party commitment has played a key role in motivating that conversion.

AB - Party activists have played a leading role in conflict extensionthe polarization of the parties along multiple issue dimensionsin contemporary American politics. We argue that open nomination systems and the ambitious politicians competing within those systems encourage activists with extreme views on a variety of issue dimensions to become involved in party politics, thus motivating candidates to take noncentrist positions on a range of issues. Once that happens, continuing activists with strong partisan commitments bring their views into line with the new candidate agendas, thus extending the domain of interparty conflict. Using cross-sectional and panel surveys of national convention delegates, we find clear evidence for conflict extension among party activists, evidence tentatively suggesting a leading role for activists in partisan conflict extension more generally, and strong support for our argument about change among continuing activists. Issue conversion among activists has contributed substantially to conflict extension and party commitment has played a key role in motivating that conversion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958494762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958494762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S000305541000016X

DO - 10.1017/S000305541000016X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77958494762

VL - 104

SP - 324

EP - 346

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

IS - 2

ER -