Accuracy of observational data with whole interval, partial interval, and momentary time-sampling recording techniques

Samuel B. Green, James F. McCoy, Kevin P. Burns, Anna C. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the accuracies obtained from whole interval, partial interval, and momentary time-sample recording procedures. Two types of accuracies were defined. Between-methods accuracy is the degree to which an observer using a particular recording method agrees with a standard using a continuous recording method. Within-methods accuracy is the degree to which an observer and a standard agree when both use the same recording method. Fifty-four undergraduate students viewed a videotape of a woman twisting her hair and recorded the occurrence or nonoccurrence of the behavior using one of the three recording methods. Tapes were divided into segments with low, intermediate, and high rates of behavior. Partial and whole interval recording obtained poorer between-methods accuracies than momentary time sampling. Results showed that whole interval and momentary time-sampling procedures yielded higher within-method accuracies than partial interval recording. Thus, momentary time-sampling recording provided the advantages of both greater representativeness and as few or fewer observer errors than whole or partial interval recording procedures. Use of the interval recording methods by researchers must be justifiable within this framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-118
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Behavioral Assessment
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Data Accuracy
Videotape Recording
Hair
Research Personnel
Students

Keywords

  • continuous monitoring
  • rater agreement
  • time sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Accuracy of observational data with whole interval, partial interval, and momentary time-sampling recording techniques. / Green, Samuel B.; McCoy, James F.; Burns, Kevin P.; Smith, Anna C.

In: Journal of Behavioral Assessment, Vol. 4, No. 2, 06.1982, p. 103-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Green, Samuel B. ; McCoy, James F. ; Burns, Kevin P. ; Smith, Anna C. / Accuracy of observational data with whole interval, partial interval, and momentary time-sampling recording techniques. In: Journal of Behavioral Assessment. 1982 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 103-118.
@article{f02b4c017e934acebc688c3f51e5392d,
title = "Accuracy of observational data with whole interval, partial interval, and momentary time-sampling recording techniques",
abstract = "The purpose of the study was to compare the accuracies obtained from whole interval, partial interval, and momentary time-sample recording procedures. Two types of accuracies were defined. Between-methods accuracy is the degree to which an observer using a particular recording method agrees with a standard using a continuous recording method. Within-methods accuracy is the degree to which an observer and a standard agree when both use the same recording method. Fifty-four undergraduate students viewed a videotape of a woman twisting her hair and recorded the occurrence or nonoccurrence of the behavior using one of the three recording methods. Tapes were divided into segments with low, intermediate, and high rates of behavior. Partial and whole interval recording obtained poorer between-methods accuracies than momentary time sampling. Results showed that whole interval and momentary time-sampling procedures yielded higher within-method accuracies than partial interval recording. Thus, momentary time-sampling recording provided the advantages of both greater representativeness and as few or fewer observer errors than whole or partial interval recording procedures. Use of the interval recording methods by researchers must be justifiable within this framework.",
keywords = "continuous monitoring, rater agreement, time sampling",
author = "Green, {Samuel B.} and McCoy, {James F.} and Burns, {Kevin P.} and Smith, {Anna C.}",
year = "1982",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF01321385",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "103--118",
journal = "Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment",
issn = "0882-2689",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of observational data with whole interval, partial interval, and momentary time-sampling recording techniques

AU - Green, Samuel B.

AU - McCoy, James F.

AU - Burns, Kevin P.

AU - Smith, Anna C.

PY - 1982/6

Y1 - 1982/6

N2 - The purpose of the study was to compare the accuracies obtained from whole interval, partial interval, and momentary time-sample recording procedures. Two types of accuracies were defined. Between-methods accuracy is the degree to which an observer using a particular recording method agrees with a standard using a continuous recording method. Within-methods accuracy is the degree to which an observer and a standard agree when both use the same recording method. Fifty-four undergraduate students viewed a videotape of a woman twisting her hair and recorded the occurrence or nonoccurrence of the behavior using one of the three recording methods. Tapes were divided into segments with low, intermediate, and high rates of behavior. Partial and whole interval recording obtained poorer between-methods accuracies than momentary time sampling. Results showed that whole interval and momentary time-sampling procedures yielded higher within-method accuracies than partial interval recording. Thus, momentary time-sampling recording provided the advantages of both greater representativeness and as few or fewer observer errors than whole or partial interval recording procedures. Use of the interval recording methods by researchers must be justifiable within this framework.

AB - The purpose of the study was to compare the accuracies obtained from whole interval, partial interval, and momentary time-sample recording procedures. Two types of accuracies were defined. Between-methods accuracy is the degree to which an observer using a particular recording method agrees with a standard using a continuous recording method. Within-methods accuracy is the degree to which an observer and a standard agree when both use the same recording method. Fifty-four undergraduate students viewed a videotape of a woman twisting her hair and recorded the occurrence or nonoccurrence of the behavior using one of the three recording methods. Tapes were divided into segments with low, intermediate, and high rates of behavior. Partial and whole interval recording obtained poorer between-methods accuracies than momentary time sampling. Results showed that whole interval and momentary time-sampling procedures yielded higher within-method accuracies than partial interval recording. Thus, momentary time-sampling recording provided the advantages of both greater representativeness and as few or fewer observer errors than whole or partial interval recording procedures. Use of the interval recording methods by researchers must be justifiable within this framework.

KW - continuous monitoring

KW - rater agreement

KW - time sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020395940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020395940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01321385

DO - 10.1007/BF01321385

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 103

EP - 118

JO - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

JF - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

SN - 0882-2689

IS - 2

ER -