Accuracy of health-related quality of life assessment

What is the benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domain functioning?

Kristina G. Gorbatenko-Roth, Irwin P. Levin, Elizabeth M. Altmaier, Bradley Doebbeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the accuracy benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domains of functioning into health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurement. Using policy-capturing techniques, 102 medical outpatients judged the HRQOL of 16 scenarios describing varying levels of functioning in 3 domains. For each participant, regression analysis determined relative domain preferences and 2 decision models were built: one incorporating (preference-weighted) and one ignoring (equally weighted) domain preferences. To assess accuracy, the average proportion of judgment variance accounted for by each model was determined and both accounted for approximately 50%. However, for patients showing the greatest differences in importance across domains, the preference-weighted model was more accurate. Findings are discussed in the context of enhancing HRQOL assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-140
Number of pages5
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Preference
Quality of Life
Outpatients
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • HRQOL
  • Measurement
  • Preferences
  • Quality of life
  • Social judgment theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Accuracy of health-related quality of life assessment : What is the benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domain functioning? / Gorbatenko-Roth, Kristina G.; Levin, Irwin P.; Altmaier, Elizabeth M.; Doebbeling, Bradley.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2001, p. 136-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gorbatenko-Roth, Kristina G. ; Levin, Irwin P. ; Altmaier, Elizabeth M. ; Doebbeling, Bradley. / Accuracy of health-related quality of life assessment : What is the benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domain functioning?. In: Health Psychology. 2001 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 136-140.
@article{31666595c188437482e9ef0df5dc6794,
title = "Accuracy of health-related quality of life assessment: What is the benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domain functioning?",
abstract = "This study investigated the accuracy benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domains of functioning into health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurement. Using policy-capturing techniques, 102 medical outpatients judged the HRQOL of 16 scenarios describing varying levels of functioning in 3 domains. For each participant, regression analysis determined relative domain preferences and 2 decision models were built: one incorporating (preference-weighted) and one ignoring (equally weighted) domain preferences. To assess accuracy, the average proportion of judgment variance accounted for by each model was determined and both accounted for approximately 50{\%}. However, for patients showing the greatest differences in importance across domains, the preference-weighted model was more accurate. Findings are discussed in the context of enhancing HRQOL assessment.",
keywords = "Decision making, HRQOL, Measurement, Preferences, Quality of life, Social judgment theory",
author = "Gorbatenko-Roth, {Kristina G.} and Levin, {Irwin P.} and Altmaier, {Elizabeth M.} and Bradley Doebbeling",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1037//0278-6133.20.2.136",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "136--140",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of health-related quality of life assessment

T2 - What is the benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domain functioning?

AU - Gorbatenko-Roth, Kristina G.

AU - Levin, Irwin P.

AU - Altmaier, Elizabeth M.

AU - Doebbeling, Bradley

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This study investigated the accuracy benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domains of functioning into health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurement. Using policy-capturing techniques, 102 medical outpatients judged the HRQOL of 16 scenarios describing varying levels of functioning in 3 domains. For each participant, regression analysis determined relative domain preferences and 2 decision models were built: one incorporating (preference-weighted) and one ignoring (equally weighted) domain preferences. To assess accuracy, the average proportion of judgment variance accounted for by each model was determined and both accounted for approximately 50%. However, for patients showing the greatest differences in importance across domains, the preference-weighted model was more accurate. Findings are discussed in the context of enhancing HRQOL assessment.

AB - This study investigated the accuracy benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domains of functioning into health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurement. Using policy-capturing techniques, 102 medical outpatients judged the HRQOL of 16 scenarios describing varying levels of functioning in 3 domains. For each participant, regression analysis determined relative domain preferences and 2 decision models were built: one incorporating (preference-weighted) and one ignoring (equally weighted) domain preferences. To assess accuracy, the average proportion of judgment variance accounted for by each model was determined and both accounted for approximately 50%. However, for patients showing the greatest differences in importance across domains, the preference-weighted model was more accurate. Findings are discussed in the context of enhancing HRQOL assessment.

KW - Decision making

KW - HRQOL

KW - Measurement

KW - Preferences

KW - Quality of life

KW - Social judgment theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035083273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035083273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037//0278-6133.20.2.136

DO - 10.1037//0278-6133.20.2.136

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 136

EP - 140

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 2

ER -