Accuracy assessment technique for testing multiple sub-pixel mapping downscaling factors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Sub-pixelmapping (SPM; a.k.a. super-resolutionmapping) is a sub-field of remote sensing focused on mapping the spatial distribution of land covers from fractional land cover maps, such as those produced by spectral unmixing. A necessary consideration for developing universally applicable SPM methods is that they are able to function across multiple target scales (i.e. zoom factors). Yet most studies test only a single scale, likely due to the challenges of testing a SPM technique that is transferable across multiple scales. This study develops a simple adjustment to the widely used confusion-errormatrix that can account for the uncertainties introduced when reference data must be aggregated to permit testing multiple downscaling factors. Results show how off-diagonal components (e.g. errors of commission and omission) can be adjusted to account for the overestimation of disagreement that occurs during scale translations. Furthermore, results show how supplemental accuracy can be accounted for between the SPM result and areas with low fractional proportions, which is not possible using currently available methods. This simple yet effective way to compare accuracies across scale factors provides a means to develop and test SPM methods applicable across multiple scales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)992-1001
Number of pages10
JournalRemote Sensing Letters
Volume9
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 3 2018

Fingerprint

accuracy assessment
downscaling
pixel
Pixels
land cover
Testing
Spatial distribution
Remote sensing
spatial distribution
remote sensing
method
test
Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Accuracy assessment technique for testing multiple sub-pixel mapping downscaling factors. / Frazier, Amy E.

In: Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 9, No. 10, 03.10.2018, p. 992-1001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d156d0b68bff4d699121209144a5d1e5,
title = "Accuracy assessment technique for testing multiple sub-pixel mapping downscaling factors",
abstract = "Sub-pixelmapping (SPM; a.k.a. super-resolutionmapping) is a sub-field of remote sensing focused on mapping the spatial distribution of land covers from fractional land cover maps, such as those produced by spectral unmixing. A necessary consideration for developing universally applicable SPM methods is that they are able to function across multiple target scales (i.e. zoom factors). Yet most studies test only a single scale, likely due to the challenges of testing a SPM technique that is transferable across multiple scales. This study develops a simple adjustment to the widely used confusion-errormatrix that can account for the uncertainties introduced when reference data must be aggregated to permit testing multiple downscaling factors. Results show how off-diagonal components (e.g. errors of commission and omission) can be adjusted to account for the overestimation of disagreement that occurs during scale translations. Furthermore, results show how supplemental accuracy can be accounted for between the SPM result and areas with low fractional proportions, which is not possible using currently available methods. This simple yet effective way to compare accuracies across scale factors provides a means to develop and test SPM methods applicable across multiple scales.",
author = "Frazier, {Amy E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/2150704X.2018.1500724",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "992--1001",
journal = "Remote Sensing Letters",
issn = "2150-704X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy assessment technique for testing multiple sub-pixel mapping downscaling factors

AU - Frazier, Amy E.

PY - 2018/10/3

Y1 - 2018/10/3

N2 - Sub-pixelmapping (SPM; a.k.a. super-resolutionmapping) is a sub-field of remote sensing focused on mapping the spatial distribution of land covers from fractional land cover maps, such as those produced by spectral unmixing. A necessary consideration for developing universally applicable SPM methods is that they are able to function across multiple target scales (i.e. zoom factors). Yet most studies test only a single scale, likely due to the challenges of testing a SPM technique that is transferable across multiple scales. This study develops a simple adjustment to the widely used confusion-errormatrix that can account for the uncertainties introduced when reference data must be aggregated to permit testing multiple downscaling factors. Results show how off-diagonal components (e.g. errors of commission and omission) can be adjusted to account for the overestimation of disagreement that occurs during scale translations. Furthermore, results show how supplemental accuracy can be accounted for between the SPM result and areas with low fractional proportions, which is not possible using currently available methods. This simple yet effective way to compare accuracies across scale factors provides a means to develop and test SPM methods applicable across multiple scales.

AB - Sub-pixelmapping (SPM; a.k.a. super-resolutionmapping) is a sub-field of remote sensing focused on mapping the spatial distribution of land covers from fractional land cover maps, such as those produced by spectral unmixing. A necessary consideration for developing universally applicable SPM methods is that they are able to function across multiple target scales (i.e. zoom factors). Yet most studies test only a single scale, likely due to the challenges of testing a SPM technique that is transferable across multiple scales. This study develops a simple adjustment to the widely used confusion-errormatrix that can account for the uncertainties introduced when reference data must be aggregated to permit testing multiple downscaling factors. Results show how off-diagonal components (e.g. errors of commission and omission) can be adjusted to account for the overestimation of disagreement that occurs during scale translations. Furthermore, results show how supplemental accuracy can be accounted for between the SPM result and areas with low fractional proportions, which is not possible using currently available methods. This simple yet effective way to compare accuracies across scale factors provides a means to develop and test SPM methods applicable across multiple scales.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055734159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055734159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/2150704X.2018.1500724

DO - 10.1080/2150704X.2018.1500724

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055734159

VL - 9

SP - 992

EP - 1001

JO - Remote Sensing Letters

JF - Remote Sensing Letters

SN - 2150-704X

IS - 10

ER -