Accounting quality and debt contracting

Sreedhar Bharath, Jayanthi Sunder, Shyam V. Sunder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

306 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We study the role of borrower accounting quality in debt contracting. Specifically, we examine how accounting quality affects the borrower's choice of private versus public debt market and how the design of debt contracts vary with accounting quality in the two markets. We find that accounting quality affects the choice of the market, with poorer accounting quality borrowers preferring private debt, i.e., bank loans. This is consistent with banks possessing superior information access and processing abilities that reduce adverse selection costs for borrowers. We also find that accounting quality has an economically significant but differential impact on contract design in the two markets consistent with differences in recontracting flexibility across the two markets. In the case of private debt, since there is greater recontracting flexibility, both the price (i.e., interest) and non-price (i.e., maturity and collateral) terms are significantly more stringent for poorer accounting quality borrowers, unlike public debt where only the price terms are more stringent. The impact of accounting quality on interest spreads of public debt is 2.5 times that of the private debt, since the price terms alone reflect the variation in accounting quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-28
Number of pages28
JournalAccounting Review
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Debt contracting
Accounting quality
Private debt
Public debt
Adverse selection costs
Contract design
Bank loans
Debt contracts
Maturity

Keywords

  • Accounting quality
  • Accruals
  • Bonds
  • Debt contracts
  • Loan terms
  • Loans
  • Private debt
  • Public debt

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Accounting
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Accounting quality and debt contracting. / Bharath, Sreedhar; Sunder, Jayanthi; Sunder, Shyam V.

In: Accounting Review, Vol. 83, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 1-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bharath, Sreedhar ; Sunder, Jayanthi ; Sunder, Shyam V. / Accounting quality and debt contracting. In: Accounting Review. 2008 ; Vol. 83, No. 1. pp. 1-28.
@article{aba1f5b8407d47978b8bac1215ee0490,
title = "Accounting quality and debt contracting",
abstract = "We study the role of borrower accounting quality in debt contracting. Specifically, we examine how accounting quality affects the borrower's choice of private versus public debt market and how the design of debt contracts vary with accounting quality in the two markets. We find that accounting quality affects the choice of the market, with poorer accounting quality borrowers preferring private debt, i.e., bank loans. This is consistent with banks possessing superior information access and processing abilities that reduce adverse selection costs for borrowers. We also find that accounting quality has an economically significant but differential impact on contract design in the two markets consistent with differences in recontracting flexibility across the two markets. In the case of private debt, since there is greater recontracting flexibility, both the price (i.e., interest) and non-price (i.e., maturity and collateral) terms are significantly more stringent for poorer accounting quality borrowers, unlike public debt where only the price terms are more stringent. The impact of accounting quality on interest spreads of public debt is 2.5 times that of the private debt, since the price terms alone reflect the variation in accounting quality.",
keywords = "Accounting quality, Accruals, Bonds, Debt contracts, Loan terms, Loans, Private debt, Public debt",
author = "Sreedhar Bharath and Jayanthi Sunder and Sunder, {Shyam V.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "1--28",
journal = "Accounting Review",
issn = "0001-4826",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting quality and debt contracting

AU - Bharath, Sreedhar

AU - Sunder, Jayanthi

AU - Sunder, Shyam V.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - We study the role of borrower accounting quality in debt contracting. Specifically, we examine how accounting quality affects the borrower's choice of private versus public debt market and how the design of debt contracts vary with accounting quality in the two markets. We find that accounting quality affects the choice of the market, with poorer accounting quality borrowers preferring private debt, i.e., bank loans. This is consistent with banks possessing superior information access and processing abilities that reduce adverse selection costs for borrowers. We also find that accounting quality has an economically significant but differential impact on contract design in the two markets consistent with differences in recontracting flexibility across the two markets. In the case of private debt, since there is greater recontracting flexibility, both the price (i.e., interest) and non-price (i.e., maturity and collateral) terms are significantly more stringent for poorer accounting quality borrowers, unlike public debt where only the price terms are more stringent. The impact of accounting quality on interest spreads of public debt is 2.5 times that of the private debt, since the price terms alone reflect the variation in accounting quality.

AB - We study the role of borrower accounting quality in debt contracting. Specifically, we examine how accounting quality affects the borrower's choice of private versus public debt market and how the design of debt contracts vary with accounting quality in the two markets. We find that accounting quality affects the choice of the market, with poorer accounting quality borrowers preferring private debt, i.e., bank loans. This is consistent with banks possessing superior information access and processing abilities that reduce adverse selection costs for borrowers. We also find that accounting quality has an economically significant but differential impact on contract design in the two markets consistent with differences in recontracting flexibility across the two markets. In the case of private debt, since there is greater recontracting flexibility, both the price (i.e., interest) and non-price (i.e., maturity and collateral) terms are significantly more stringent for poorer accounting quality borrowers, unlike public debt where only the price terms are more stringent. The impact of accounting quality on interest spreads of public debt is 2.5 times that of the private debt, since the price terms alone reflect the variation in accounting quality.

KW - Accounting quality

KW - Accruals

KW - Bonds

KW - Debt contracts

KW - Loan terms

KW - Loans

KW - Private debt

KW - Public debt

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39749102299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39749102299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.1

DO - 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:39749102299

VL - 83

SP - 1

EP - 28

JO - Accounting Review

JF - Accounting Review

SN - 0001-4826

IS - 1

ER -