Accountability for students in K-12 online learning: Perspectives from michigan stakeholders and beyond

Leanna Archambault, Kathryn Kennedy, Joseph R. Freidhoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Policy surrounding K-12 online learning continues to evolve as the field grows exponentially. In Michigan, Section 21f of the State School Aid Act enacted in 2013 strengthened parents’ and students’ ability to request online courses: “A student enrolled in a district in any of grades 6 to 12 is eligible to enroll in an online course as provided for in this section.” The passing of 21f raised concerns around accountability in a choice environment. Examples of such concerns included a pervasive belief about the lack of rigor or quality in online courses, an aversion to another district educating a student for one or two courses yet remaining responsible for that student’s growth, and uncertainty about how mentors and teachers would be evaluated on their online students. Consequently, a legislative directive was issued to the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute, the research arm of Michigan Virtual University that centered on accountability. In response to that directive, Michigan stakeholders, as well as experts from other course access states and national organizations, were interviewed to better understand the conversations surrounding accountability in K-12 online learning in Michigan and beyond and to make key recommendations for moving the field forward in an informed way. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Implications for research, policy, and practice are shared.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-139
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Asynchronous Learning Network
Volume20
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

stakeholder
Students
responsibility
learning
student
virtual university
district
research policy
research practice
research facility
parents
conversation
school grade
act
uncertainty
expert
lack
ability
teacher
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Accountability for students in K-12 online learning : Perspectives from michigan stakeholders and beyond. / Archambault, Leanna; Kennedy, Kathryn; Freidhoff, Joseph R.

In: Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 126-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01443eb9b22c409283b7537ccc29f24b,
title = "Accountability for students in K-12 online learning: Perspectives from michigan stakeholders and beyond",
abstract = "Policy surrounding K-12 online learning continues to evolve as the field grows exponentially. In Michigan, Section 21f of the State School Aid Act enacted in 2013 strengthened parents’ and students’ ability to request online courses: “A student enrolled in a district in any of grades 6 to 12 is eligible to enroll in an online course as provided for in this section.” The passing of 21f raised concerns around accountability in a choice environment. Examples of such concerns included a pervasive belief about the lack of rigor or quality in online courses, an aversion to another district educating a student for one or two courses yet remaining responsible for that student’s growth, and uncertainty about how mentors and teachers would be evaluated on their online students. Consequently, a legislative directive was issued to the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute, the research arm of Michigan Virtual University that centered on accountability. In response to that directive, Michigan stakeholders, as well as experts from other course access states and national organizations, were interviewed to better understand the conversations surrounding accountability in K-12 online learning in Michigan and beyond and to make key recommendations for moving the field forward in an informed way. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Implications for research, policy, and practice are shared.",
author = "Leanna Archambault and Kathryn Kennedy and Freidhoff, {Joseph R.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "126--139",
journal = "Online Learning Journal",
issn = "2472-5730",
publisher = "The Online Learning Consortium",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accountability for students in K-12 online learning

T2 - Perspectives from michigan stakeholders and beyond

AU - Archambault, Leanna

AU - Kennedy, Kathryn

AU - Freidhoff, Joseph R.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Policy surrounding K-12 online learning continues to evolve as the field grows exponentially. In Michigan, Section 21f of the State School Aid Act enacted in 2013 strengthened parents’ and students’ ability to request online courses: “A student enrolled in a district in any of grades 6 to 12 is eligible to enroll in an online course as provided for in this section.” The passing of 21f raised concerns around accountability in a choice environment. Examples of such concerns included a pervasive belief about the lack of rigor or quality in online courses, an aversion to another district educating a student for one or two courses yet remaining responsible for that student’s growth, and uncertainty about how mentors and teachers would be evaluated on their online students. Consequently, a legislative directive was issued to the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute, the research arm of Michigan Virtual University that centered on accountability. In response to that directive, Michigan stakeholders, as well as experts from other course access states and national organizations, were interviewed to better understand the conversations surrounding accountability in K-12 online learning in Michigan and beyond and to make key recommendations for moving the field forward in an informed way. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Implications for research, policy, and practice are shared.

AB - Policy surrounding K-12 online learning continues to evolve as the field grows exponentially. In Michigan, Section 21f of the State School Aid Act enacted in 2013 strengthened parents’ and students’ ability to request online courses: “A student enrolled in a district in any of grades 6 to 12 is eligible to enroll in an online course as provided for in this section.” The passing of 21f raised concerns around accountability in a choice environment. Examples of such concerns included a pervasive belief about the lack of rigor or quality in online courses, an aversion to another district educating a student for one or two courses yet remaining responsible for that student’s growth, and uncertainty about how mentors and teachers would be evaluated on their online students. Consequently, a legislative directive was issued to the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute, the research arm of Michigan Virtual University that centered on accountability. In response to that directive, Michigan stakeholders, as well as experts from other course access states and national organizations, were interviewed to better understand the conversations surrounding accountability in K-12 online learning in Michigan and beyond and to make key recommendations for moving the field forward in an informed way. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Implications for research, policy, and practice are shared.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986238379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986238379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986238379

VL - 20

SP - 126

EP - 139

JO - Online Learning Journal

JF - Online Learning Journal

SN - 2472-5730

IS - 3

ER -