Accomplishing "rapport" in qualitative research interviews: Empathic moments in interaction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study seeks to bring a more interactionally grounded perspective to the concept of "rapport" and its relevance for qualitative interviewing practices. Building on work within conversation analysis (CA), it respecifies rapport as affiliation and, more specifically, empathy. Analysis centers on case study data from an interview with an asylum seeker from the Philippines. It examines how interviewer and interviewee move in and out of empathic moments across the interview sequences as they manage their affective stances related to the events the interviewee describes and, in turn, by managing their empathic alignments with each other. These empathic moments share a number of features: they primarily come after response delays and the interviewee's response pursuits, they are part of assessment sequences built by lexical reformulation and repetition, they entail stance matching and upgrading mainly through the use of prosodic resources, and they involve the interviewee asserting his primary rights to characterize and assess his own experiences. The article concludes by recommending more attention to the affiliative and empathic dimensions of qualitative interviewing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-511
Number of pages25
JournalApplied Linguistics Review
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 24 2018

Fingerprint

qualitative research
interaction
interview
conversation analysis
asylum seeker
empathy
Philippines
event
resources
Qualitative Research
Interaction
Research Interviews
Rapport
Interviewees
experience
Interviewing

Keywords

  • conversation analysis
  • emotion
  • empathy
  • interviews
  • rapport

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Accomplishing "rapport" in qualitative research interviews : Empathic moments in interaction. / Prior, Matthew.

In: Applied Linguistics Review, Vol. 9, No. 4, 24.10.2018, p. 487-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a4136032a1d4e9a92e4b29444c6ac30,
title = "Accomplishing {"}rapport{"} in qualitative research interviews: Empathic moments in interaction",
abstract = "This study seeks to bring a more interactionally grounded perspective to the concept of {"}rapport{"} and its relevance for qualitative interviewing practices. Building on work within conversation analysis (CA), it respecifies rapport as affiliation and, more specifically, empathy. Analysis centers on case study data from an interview with an asylum seeker from the Philippines. It examines how interviewer and interviewee move in and out of empathic moments across the interview sequences as they manage their affective stances related to the events the interviewee describes and, in turn, by managing their empathic alignments with each other. These empathic moments share a number of features: they primarily come after response delays and the interviewee's response pursuits, they are part of assessment sequences built by lexical reformulation and repetition, they entail stance matching and upgrading mainly through the use of prosodic resources, and they involve the interviewee asserting his primary rights to characterize and assess his own experiences. The article concludes by recommending more attention to the affiliative and empathic dimensions of qualitative interviewing.",
keywords = "conversation analysis, emotion, empathy, interviews, rapport",
author = "Matthew Prior",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1515/applirev-2017-0029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "487--511",
journal = "Applied Linguistics Review",
issn = "1868-6303",
publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accomplishing "rapport" in qualitative research interviews

T2 - Empathic moments in interaction

AU - Prior, Matthew

PY - 2018/10/24

Y1 - 2018/10/24

N2 - This study seeks to bring a more interactionally grounded perspective to the concept of "rapport" and its relevance for qualitative interviewing practices. Building on work within conversation analysis (CA), it respecifies rapport as affiliation and, more specifically, empathy. Analysis centers on case study data from an interview with an asylum seeker from the Philippines. It examines how interviewer and interviewee move in and out of empathic moments across the interview sequences as they manage their affective stances related to the events the interviewee describes and, in turn, by managing their empathic alignments with each other. These empathic moments share a number of features: they primarily come after response delays and the interviewee's response pursuits, they are part of assessment sequences built by lexical reformulation and repetition, they entail stance matching and upgrading mainly through the use of prosodic resources, and they involve the interviewee asserting his primary rights to characterize and assess his own experiences. The article concludes by recommending more attention to the affiliative and empathic dimensions of qualitative interviewing.

AB - This study seeks to bring a more interactionally grounded perspective to the concept of "rapport" and its relevance for qualitative interviewing practices. Building on work within conversation analysis (CA), it respecifies rapport as affiliation and, more specifically, empathy. Analysis centers on case study data from an interview with an asylum seeker from the Philippines. It examines how interviewer and interviewee move in and out of empathic moments across the interview sequences as they manage their affective stances related to the events the interviewee describes and, in turn, by managing their empathic alignments with each other. These empathic moments share a number of features: they primarily come after response delays and the interviewee's response pursuits, they are part of assessment sequences built by lexical reformulation and repetition, they entail stance matching and upgrading mainly through the use of prosodic resources, and they involve the interviewee asserting his primary rights to characterize and assess his own experiences. The article concludes by recommending more attention to the affiliative and empathic dimensions of qualitative interviewing.

KW - conversation analysis

KW - emotion

KW - empathy

KW - interviews

KW - rapport

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044892706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044892706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/applirev-2017-0029

DO - 10.1515/applirev-2017-0029

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044892706

VL - 9

SP - 487

EP - 511

JO - Applied Linguistics Review

JF - Applied Linguistics Review

SN - 1868-6303

IS - 4

ER -