A Standardized Generalized Dimensionality Discrepancy Measure and a Standardized Model-Based Covariance for Dimensionality Assessment for Multidimensional Models

Roy Levy, Yuning Xu, Nedim Yel, Dubravka Svetina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The standardized generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure and the standardized model-based covariance are introduced as tools to critique dimensionality assumptions in multidimensional item response models. These tools are grounded in a covariance theory perspective and associated connections between dimensionality and local independence. Relative to their precursors, they allow for dimensionality assessment in a more readily interpretable metric of correlations. A simulation study demonstrates the utility of the discrepancy measures' application at multiple levels of dimensionality analysis, and compares them to factor analytic and item response theoretic approaches. An example illustrates their use in practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-158
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Educational Measurement
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Applied Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

A Standardized Generalized Dimensionality Discrepancy Measure and a Standardized Model-Based Covariance for Dimensionality Assessment for Multidimensional Models. / Levy, Roy; Xu, Yuning; Yel, Nedim; Svetina, Dubravka.

In: Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 52, No. 2, 01.06.2015, p. 144-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{651b8b8b623a4854b17f72761c0b80eb,
title = "A Standardized Generalized Dimensionality Discrepancy Measure and a Standardized Model-Based Covariance for Dimensionality Assessment for Multidimensional Models",
abstract = "The standardized generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure and the standardized model-based covariance are introduced as tools to critique dimensionality assumptions in multidimensional item response models. These tools are grounded in a covariance theory perspective and associated connections between dimensionality and local independence. Relative to their precursors, they allow for dimensionality assessment in a more readily interpretable metric of correlations. A simulation study demonstrates the utility of the discrepancy measures' application at multiple levels of dimensionality analysis, and compares them to factor analytic and item response theoretic approaches. An example illustrates their use in practice.",
author = "Roy Levy and Yuning Xu and Nedim Yel and Dubravka Svetina",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jedm.12070",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "144--158",
journal = "Journal of Educational Measurement",
issn = "0022-0655",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Standardized Generalized Dimensionality Discrepancy Measure and a Standardized Model-Based Covariance for Dimensionality Assessment for Multidimensional Models

AU - Levy, Roy

AU - Xu, Yuning

AU - Yel, Nedim

AU - Svetina, Dubravka

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - The standardized generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure and the standardized model-based covariance are introduced as tools to critique dimensionality assumptions in multidimensional item response models. These tools are grounded in a covariance theory perspective and associated connections between dimensionality and local independence. Relative to their precursors, they allow for dimensionality assessment in a more readily interpretable metric of correlations. A simulation study demonstrates the utility of the discrepancy measures' application at multiple levels of dimensionality analysis, and compares them to factor analytic and item response theoretic approaches. An example illustrates their use in practice.

AB - The standardized generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure and the standardized model-based covariance are introduced as tools to critique dimensionality assumptions in multidimensional item response models. These tools are grounded in a covariance theory perspective and associated connections between dimensionality and local independence. Relative to their precursors, they allow for dimensionality assessment in a more readily interpretable metric of correlations. A simulation study demonstrates the utility of the discrepancy measures' application at multiple levels of dimensionality analysis, and compares them to factor analytic and item response theoretic approaches. An example illustrates their use in practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930171786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930171786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jedm.12070

DO - 10.1111/jedm.12070

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 144

EP - 158

JO - Journal of Educational Measurement

JF - Journal of Educational Measurement

SN - 0022-0655

IS - 2

ER -