A model of candidate evaluations in senate elections

The impact of campaign intensity

Kim Fridkin Kahn, Patrick Kenney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We theorize that campaign intensity alters the criteria individuals use when evaluating candidates. We define campaign intensity as the culmination of the interplay among the candidates, news media, and the perceived closeness of the race. As the intensity increases, we expect people to adjust their decision-making critea. Examining the impact of intensity in 97 Senate races between 1988 and 1992, we find that intense campaigns encourage individuals to rely more heavily on both sophisticated criteria and simple decision rules when forming impressions of candidates. As campaigns become more hard-fought, people are more likely to consider policy and ideology as well as partisanship and retrospective evaluations of the president and the economy. While the campaign setting clearly affects citizens' decision-making processes, different types of people react differently to the intensity of the campaign. As races become more competitive, novices begin to rely more heavily on issues, sociotropic assessments, party identification, and presidential approval, whereas political experts are less affected by changes in the campaign environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1173-1205
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume59
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 1997

Fingerprint

senate
candidacy
campaign
election
evaluation
decision-making process
president
news
ideology
expert
citizen
decision making
economy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

A model of candidate evaluations in senate elections : The impact of campaign intensity. / Kahn, Kim Fridkin; Kenney, Patrick.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 59, No. 4, 11.1997, p. 1173-1205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed18fdcb64e14338b5235b70cde342a9,
title = "A model of candidate evaluations in senate elections: The impact of campaign intensity",
abstract = "We theorize that campaign intensity alters the criteria individuals use when evaluating candidates. We define campaign intensity as the culmination of the interplay among the candidates, news media, and the perceived closeness of the race. As the intensity increases, we expect people to adjust their decision-making critea. Examining the impact of intensity in 97 Senate races between 1988 and 1992, we find that intense campaigns encourage individuals to rely more heavily on both sophisticated criteria and simple decision rules when forming impressions of candidates. As campaigns become more hard-fought, people are more likely to consider policy and ideology as well as partisanship and retrospective evaluations of the president and the economy. While the campaign setting clearly affects citizens' decision-making processes, different types of people react differently to the intensity of the campaign. As races become more competitive, novices begin to rely more heavily on issues, sociotropic assessments, party identification, and presidential approval, whereas political experts are less affected by changes in the campaign environment.",
author = "Kahn, {Kim Fridkin} and Patrick Kenney",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "1173--1205",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A model of candidate evaluations in senate elections

T2 - The impact of campaign intensity

AU - Kahn, Kim Fridkin

AU - Kenney, Patrick

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - We theorize that campaign intensity alters the criteria individuals use when evaluating candidates. We define campaign intensity as the culmination of the interplay among the candidates, news media, and the perceived closeness of the race. As the intensity increases, we expect people to adjust their decision-making critea. Examining the impact of intensity in 97 Senate races between 1988 and 1992, we find that intense campaigns encourage individuals to rely more heavily on both sophisticated criteria and simple decision rules when forming impressions of candidates. As campaigns become more hard-fought, people are more likely to consider policy and ideology as well as partisanship and retrospective evaluations of the president and the economy. While the campaign setting clearly affects citizens' decision-making processes, different types of people react differently to the intensity of the campaign. As races become more competitive, novices begin to rely more heavily on issues, sociotropic assessments, party identification, and presidential approval, whereas political experts are less affected by changes in the campaign environment.

AB - We theorize that campaign intensity alters the criteria individuals use when evaluating candidates. We define campaign intensity as the culmination of the interplay among the candidates, news media, and the perceived closeness of the race. As the intensity increases, we expect people to adjust their decision-making critea. Examining the impact of intensity in 97 Senate races between 1988 and 1992, we find that intense campaigns encourage individuals to rely more heavily on both sophisticated criteria and simple decision rules when forming impressions of candidates. As campaigns become more hard-fought, people are more likely to consider policy and ideology as well as partisanship and retrospective evaluations of the president and the economy. While the campaign setting clearly affects citizens' decision-making processes, different types of people react differently to the intensity of the campaign. As races become more competitive, novices begin to rely more heavily on issues, sociotropic assessments, party identification, and presidential approval, whereas political experts are less affected by changes in the campaign environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031260729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031260729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 1173

EP - 1205

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 4

ER -