A histological reconstruction of dental development in the common chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes

Donald J. Reid, Gary Schwartz, Christopher Dean, Malkanthi S. Chandrasekera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Much is known about the dental development of Pan compared with that for other extant great apes. The majority of information available has concentrated either on the emergence times of teeth or on the sequence of mineralization stages of the teeth as revealed from radiographs. However, the problems of defining stages of tooth formation sufficiently accurately on radiographs are only now becoming recognized. All of the data available to date suggest the presence of a more variable picture for the timing of mineralization stages in chimpanzees than for the timing of tooth emergence. In particular, arguments persist in the literature over the time of initial mineralization and the time it takes to form each anterior tooth crown in chimpanzees. Therefore we attempt to provide a more precise chronological time scale for dental development in our closest living relative. Furthermore, we examine the sequence of molar cusp formation relative to enamel formation times related specifically to those cusps and to try to tie these data in with information from functional studies of molar crowns. Histological sections of 14 maxillary and 28 mandibular teeth from four chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) individuals and three molar teeth from three chimpanzees of unknown origin were prepared in accordance with a well-established protocol. By combining data on short-period and long-period incremental lines (including daily secretion rates, periodicity, prism lengths and enamel thickness) in both enamel and dentine, we reconstruct times for the onset and duration of crown formation as well as construct a schedule for the pattern and timing of dental development in this one hominoid species. Interestingly, our histologically-derived data confirms that the data from radiographic studies underestimate crown formation times by the following amounts for each tooth type: I1 2·5 years, I2 3·1 years, C 1·6 years, P3 1·9 years, P4 0·1 years, M1 0·8 years, M2 1·1 years and M3 0·3 years. When combined with data on gingival emergence, it seems that chimpanzee teeth have a greatly reduced time for root growth before emergence occurs and that the major differences between Homo sapiens and Pan lie in the first part of the root formation rather than in the total period of crown formation. Maxillary and mandibular molar functional cusps take longer to complete enamel formation to the cervix than any other cusp in that same tooth, which makes sense as these cusps are thick enamelled. These results suggest that new links can be made between developmental aspects, occlusal morphology and tooth function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)427-448
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Human Evolution
Volume35
Issue number4-5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pan troglodytes
tooth
teeth
reconstruction
enamel
tooth enamel
mineralization
Pan (Pongidae)
time
available information
tree crown
secretion
periodicity
cervix
Pongidae
Hominidae
timescale
root growth

Keywords

  • Crown formation
  • Cusp formation
  • Dental chronology
  • Dentine
  • Enamel
  • Growth
  • Incremental markings
  • Root formation
  • Teeth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

A histological reconstruction of dental development in the common chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes. / Reid, Donald J.; Schwartz, Gary; Dean, Christopher; Chandrasekera, Malkanthi S.

In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 35, No. 4-5, 1998, p. 427-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reid, Donald J. ; Schwartz, Gary ; Dean, Christopher ; Chandrasekera, Malkanthi S. / A histological reconstruction of dental development in the common chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes. In: Journal of Human Evolution. 1998 ; Vol. 35, No. 4-5. pp. 427-448.
@article{5ea175613ef3492ba049bd8e42895f3c,
title = "A histological reconstruction of dental development in the common chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes",
abstract = "Much is known about the dental development of Pan compared with that for other extant great apes. The majority of information available has concentrated either on the emergence times of teeth or on the sequence of mineralization stages of the teeth as revealed from radiographs. However, the problems of defining stages of tooth formation sufficiently accurately on radiographs are only now becoming recognized. All of the data available to date suggest the presence of a more variable picture for the timing of mineralization stages in chimpanzees than for the timing of tooth emergence. In particular, arguments persist in the literature over the time of initial mineralization and the time it takes to form each anterior tooth crown in chimpanzees. Therefore we attempt to provide a more precise chronological time scale for dental development in our closest living relative. Furthermore, we examine the sequence of molar cusp formation relative to enamel formation times related specifically to those cusps and to try to tie these data in with information from functional studies of molar crowns. Histological sections of 14 maxillary and 28 mandibular teeth from four chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) individuals and three molar teeth from three chimpanzees of unknown origin were prepared in accordance with a well-established protocol. By combining data on short-period and long-period incremental lines (including daily secretion rates, periodicity, prism lengths and enamel thickness) in both enamel and dentine, we reconstruct times for the onset and duration of crown formation as well as construct a schedule for the pattern and timing of dental development in this one hominoid species. Interestingly, our histologically-derived data confirms that the data from radiographic studies underestimate crown formation times by the following amounts for each tooth type: I1 2·5 years, I2 3·1 years, C 1·6 years, P3 1·9 years, P4 0·1 years, M1 0·8 years, M2 1·1 years and M3 0·3 years. When combined with data on gingival emergence, it seems that chimpanzee teeth have a greatly reduced time for root growth before emergence occurs and that the major differences between Homo sapiens and Pan lie in the first part of the root formation rather than in the total period of crown formation. Maxillary and mandibular molar functional cusps take longer to complete enamel formation to the cervix than any other cusp in that same tooth, which makes sense as these cusps are thick enamelled. These results suggest that new links can be made between developmental aspects, occlusal morphology and tooth function.",
keywords = "Crown formation, Cusp formation, Dental chronology, Dentine, Enamel, Growth, Incremental markings, Root formation, Teeth",
author = "Reid, {Donald J.} and Gary Schwartz and Christopher Dean and Chandrasekera, {Malkanthi S.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1006/jhev.1998.0248",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "427--448",
journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",
issn = "0047-2484",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A histological reconstruction of dental development in the common chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes

AU - Reid, Donald J.

AU - Schwartz, Gary

AU - Dean, Christopher

AU - Chandrasekera, Malkanthi S.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Much is known about the dental development of Pan compared with that for other extant great apes. The majority of information available has concentrated either on the emergence times of teeth or on the sequence of mineralization stages of the teeth as revealed from radiographs. However, the problems of defining stages of tooth formation sufficiently accurately on radiographs are only now becoming recognized. All of the data available to date suggest the presence of a more variable picture for the timing of mineralization stages in chimpanzees than for the timing of tooth emergence. In particular, arguments persist in the literature over the time of initial mineralization and the time it takes to form each anterior tooth crown in chimpanzees. Therefore we attempt to provide a more precise chronological time scale for dental development in our closest living relative. Furthermore, we examine the sequence of molar cusp formation relative to enamel formation times related specifically to those cusps and to try to tie these data in with information from functional studies of molar crowns. Histological sections of 14 maxillary and 28 mandibular teeth from four chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) individuals and three molar teeth from three chimpanzees of unknown origin were prepared in accordance with a well-established protocol. By combining data on short-period and long-period incremental lines (including daily secretion rates, periodicity, prism lengths and enamel thickness) in both enamel and dentine, we reconstruct times for the onset and duration of crown formation as well as construct a schedule for the pattern and timing of dental development in this one hominoid species. Interestingly, our histologically-derived data confirms that the data from radiographic studies underestimate crown formation times by the following amounts for each tooth type: I1 2·5 years, I2 3·1 years, C 1·6 years, P3 1·9 years, P4 0·1 years, M1 0·8 years, M2 1·1 years and M3 0·3 years. When combined with data on gingival emergence, it seems that chimpanzee teeth have a greatly reduced time for root growth before emergence occurs and that the major differences between Homo sapiens and Pan lie in the first part of the root formation rather than in the total period of crown formation. Maxillary and mandibular molar functional cusps take longer to complete enamel formation to the cervix than any other cusp in that same tooth, which makes sense as these cusps are thick enamelled. These results suggest that new links can be made between developmental aspects, occlusal morphology and tooth function.

AB - Much is known about the dental development of Pan compared with that for other extant great apes. The majority of information available has concentrated either on the emergence times of teeth or on the sequence of mineralization stages of the teeth as revealed from radiographs. However, the problems of defining stages of tooth formation sufficiently accurately on radiographs are only now becoming recognized. All of the data available to date suggest the presence of a more variable picture for the timing of mineralization stages in chimpanzees than for the timing of tooth emergence. In particular, arguments persist in the literature over the time of initial mineralization and the time it takes to form each anterior tooth crown in chimpanzees. Therefore we attempt to provide a more precise chronological time scale for dental development in our closest living relative. Furthermore, we examine the sequence of molar cusp formation relative to enamel formation times related specifically to those cusps and to try to tie these data in with information from functional studies of molar crowns. Histological sections of 14 maxillary and 28 mandibular teeth from four chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) individuals and three molar teeth from three chimpanzees of unknown origin were prepared in accordance with a well-established protocol. By combining data on short-period and long-period incremental lines (including daily secretion rates, periodicity, prism lengths and enamel thickness) in both enamel and dentine, we reconstruct times for the onset and duration of crown formation as well as construct a schedule for the pattern and timing of dental development in this one hominoid species. Interestingly, our histologically-derived data confirms that the data from radiographic studies underestimate crown formation times by the following amounts for each tooth type: I1 2·5 years, I2 3·1 years, C 1·6 years, P3 1·9 years, P4 0·1 years, M1 0·8 years, M2 1·1 years and M3 0·3 years. When combined with data on gingival emergence, it seems that chimpanzee teeth have a greatly reduced time for root growth before emergence occurs and that the major differences between Homo sapiens and Pan lie in the first part of the root formation rather than in the total period of crown formation. Maxillary and mandibular molar functional cusps take longer to complete enamel formation to the cervix than any other cusp in that same tooth, which makes sense as these cusps are thick enamelled. These results suggest that new links can be made between developmental aspects, occlusal morphology and tooth function.

KW - Crown formation

KW - Cusp formation

KW - Dental chronology

KW - Dentine

KW - Enamel

KW - Growth

KW - Incremental markings

KW - Root formation

KW - Teeth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032194255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032194255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jhev.1998.0248

DO - 10.1006/jhev.1998.0248

M3 - Article

C2 - 9774504

AN - SCOPUS:0032194255

VL - 35

SP - 427

EP - 448

JO - Journal of Human Evolution

JF - Journal of Human Evolution

SN - 0047-2484

IS - 4-5

ER -