A global model for forecasting political instability

Jack A. Goldstone, Robert H. Bates, David L. Epstein, Ted Robert Gurr, Michael B. Lustik, Monty G. Marshall, Jay Ulfelder, Mark Woodward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

286 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Examining onsets of political instability in countries worldwide from 1955 to 2003, we develop a model that distinguishes countries that experienced instability from those that remained stable with a two-year lead time and over 80% accuracy. Intriguingly, the model uses few variables and a simple specification. The model is accurate in forecasting the onsets of both violent civil wars and nonviolent democratic reversals, suggesting common factors in both types of change. Whereas regime type is typically measured using linear or binary indicators of democracy/autocracy derived from the 21-point Polity scale, the model uses a nonlinear five-category measure of regime type based on the Polity components. This new measure of regime type emerges as the most powerful predictor of instability onsets, leading us to conclude that political institutions, properly specified, and not economic conditions, demography, or geography, are the most important predictors of the onset of political instability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-208
Number of pages19
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

regime
dictatorship
demography
political institution
civil war
democracy
geography
economics
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Goldstone, J. A., Bates, R. H., Epstein, D. L., Gurr, T. R., Lustik, M. B., Marshall, M. G., ... Woodward, M. (2010). A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 190-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00426.x

A global model for forecasting political instability. / Goldstone, Jack A.; Bates, Robert H.; Epstein, David L.; Gurr, Ted Robert; Lustik, Michael B.; Marshall, Monty G.; Ulfelder, Jay; Woodward, Mark.

In: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 54, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 190-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldstone, JA, Bates, RH, Epstein, DL, Gurr, TR, Lustik, MB, Marshall, MG, Ulfelder, J & Woodward, M 2010, 'A global model for forecasting political instability', American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 190-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00426.x
Goldstone JA, Bates RH, Epstein DL, Gurr TR, Lustik MB, Marshall MG et al. A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science. 2010 Jan;54(1):190-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00426.x
Goldstone, Jack A. ; Bates, Robert H. ; Epstein, David L. ; Gurr, Ted Robert ; Lustik, Michael B. ; Marshall, Monty G. ; Ulfelder, Jay ; Woodward, Mark. / A global model for forecasting political instability. In: American Journal of Political Science. 2010 ; Vol. 54, No. 1. pp. 190-208.
@article{f4d50a9f9a9a4a7fae50f8b0426f7304,
title = "A global model for forecasting political instability",
abstract = "Examining onsets of political instability in countries worldwide from 1955 to 2003, we develop a model that distinguishes countries that experienced instability from those that remained stable with a two-year lead time and over 80{\%} accuracy. Intriguingly, the model uses few variables and a simple specification. The model is accurate in forecasting the onsets of both violent civil wars and nonviolent democratic reversals, suggesting common factors in both types of change. Whereas regime type is typically measured using linear or binary indicators of democracy/autocracy derived from the 21-point Polity scale, the model uses a nonlinear five-category measure of regime type based on the Polity components. This new measure of regime type emerges as the most powerful predictor of instability onsets, leading us to conclude that political institutions, properly specified, and not economic conditions, demography, or geography, are the most important predictors of the onset of political instability.",
author = "Goldstone, {Jack A.} and Bates, {Robert H.} and Epstein, {David L.} and Gurr, {Ted Robert} and Lustik, {Michael B.} and Marshall, {Monty G.} and Jay Ulfelder and Mark Woodward",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00426.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "190--208",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A global model for forecasting political instability

AU - Goldstone, Jack A.

AU - Bates, Robert H.

AU - Epstein, David L.

AU - Gurr, Ted Robert

AU - Lustik, Michael B.

AU - Marshall, Monty G.

AU - Ulfelder, Jay

AU - Woodward, Mark

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Examining onsets of political instability in countries worldwide from 1955 to 2003, we develop a model that distinguishes countries that experienced instability from those that remained stable with a two-year lead time and over 80% accuracy. Intriguingly, the model uses few variables and a simple specification. The model is accurate in forecasting the onsets of both violent civil wars and nonviolent democratic reversals, suggesting common factors in both types of change. Whereas regime type is typically measured using linear or binary indicators of democracy/autocracy derived from the 21-point Polity scale, the model uses a nonlinear five-category measure of regime type based on the Polity components. This new measure of regime type emerges as the most powerful predictor of instability onsets, leading us to conclude that political institutions, properly specified, and not economic conditions, demography, or geography, are the most important predictors of the onset of political instability.

AB - Examining onsets of political instability in countries worldwide from 1955 to 2003, we develop a model that distinguishes countries that experienced instability from those that remained stable with a two-year lead time and over 80% accuracy. Intriguingly, the model uses few variables and a simple specification. The model is accurate in forecasting the onsets of both violent civil wars and nonviolent democratic reversals, suggesting common factors in both types of change. Whereas regime type is typically measured using linear or binary indicators of democracy/autocracy derived from the 21-point Polity scale, the model uses a nonlinear five-category measure of regime type based on the Polity components. This new measure of regime type emerges as the most powerful predictor of instability onsets, leading us to conclude that political institutions, properly specified, and not economic conditions, demography, or geography, are the most important predictors of the onset of political instability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73649102815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73649102815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00426.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00426.x

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 190

EP - 208

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

IS - 1

ER -