A framework for understanding game-based teaching and learning

Jeffrey B. Holmes, Elisabeth Gee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to provide a framework for understanding and differentiating among different forms of game-based teaching and learning (GBTL). Design/methodology/approach – The framework is based on an analysis of existing literature and descriptions of GBTL in varied higher education settings, combined with case examples of the author’s personal experience as instructors of GBTL courses. Findings – Four frames or categories of GBTL approaches were identified: the action frame, the structuring frame, the bridging frame and the design frame. Each frame represents a spectrum of related yet varied strategies and assumptions. Originality/value – This framework is a first attempt at providing an analytic tool for making sense of the varied instantiations of GBTL in higher education. It can be useful as a heuristic tool for researchers as well as a generative model for designing future GBTL practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalOn the Horizon
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 8 2016

Fingerprint

Teaching
learning
heuristics
education
instructor
methodology
Values
experience

Keywords

  • Game-based teaching and learning
  • Gamification
  • Higher education
  • Videogames

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

A framework for understanding game-based teaching and learning. / Holmes, Jeffrey B.; Gee, Elisabeth.

In: On the Horizon, Vol. 24, No. 1, 08.02.2016, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holmes, Jeffrey B. ; Gee, Elisabeth. / A framework for understanding game-based teaching and learning. In: On the Horizon. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 1-16.
@article{5c8a0618ed374c4688eb3af259def61a,
title = "A framework for understanding game-based teaching and learning",
abstract = "Purpose – This paper aims to provide a framework for understanding and differentiating among different forms of game-based teaching and learning (GBTL). Design/methodology/approach – The framework is based on an analysis of existing literature and descriptions of GBTL in varied higher education settings, combined with case examples of the author’s personal experience as instructors of GBTL courses. Findings – Four frames or categories of GBTL approaches were identified: the action frame, the structuring frame, the bridging frame and the design frame. Each frame represents a spectrum of related yet varied strategies and assumptions. Originality/value – This framework is a first attempt at providing an analytic tool for making sense of the varied instantiations of GBTL in higher education. It can be useful as a heuristic tool for researchers as well as a generative model for designing future GBTL practices.",
keywords = "Game-based teaching and learning, Gamification, Higher education, Videogames",
author = "Holmes, {Jeffrey B.} and Elisabeth Gee",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/OTH-11-2015-0069",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "On the Horizon",
issn = "1074-8121",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for understanding game-based teaching and learning

AU - Holmes, Jeffrey B.

AU - Gee, Elisabeth

PY - 2016/2/8

Y1 - 2016/2/8

N2 - Purpose – This paper aims to provide a framework for understanding and differentiating among different forms of game-based teaching and learning (GBTL). Design/methodology/approach – The framework is based on an analysis of existing literature and descriptions of GBTL in varied higher education settings, combined with case examples of the author’s personal experience as instructors of GBTL courses. Findings – Four frames or categories of GBTL approaches were identified: the action frame, the structuring frame, the bridging frame and the design frame. Each frame represents a spectrum of related yet varied strategies and assumptions. Originality/value – This framework is a first attempt at providing an analytic tool for making sense of the varied instantiations of GBTL in higher education. It can be useful as a heuristic tool for researchers as well as a generative model for designing future GBTL practices.

AB - Purpose – This paper aims to provide a framework for understanding and differentiating among different forms of game-based teaching and learning (GBTL). Design/methodology/approach – The framework is based on an analysis of existing literature and descriptions of GBTL in varied higher education settings, combined with case examples of the author’s personal experience as instructors of GBTL courses. Findings – Four frames or categories of GBTL approaches were identified: the action frame, the structuring frame, the bridging frame and the design frame. Each frame represents a spectrum of related yet varied strategies and assumptions. Originality/value – This framework is a first attempt at providing an analytic tool for making sense of the varied instantiations of GBTL in higher education. It can be useful as a heuristic tool for researchers as well as a generative model for designing future GBTL practices.

KW - Game-based teaching and learning

KW - Gamification

KW - Higher education

KW - Videogames

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958539848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958539848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/OTH-11-2015-0069

DO - 10.1108/OTH-11-2015-0069

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958539848

VL - 24

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - On the Horizon

JF - On the Horizon

SN - 1074-8121

IS - 1

ER -