A comparative analysis of performance and cost metrics associated with a diesel to biodiesel fleet transition

Scott O. Shrake, Amy E. Landis, Melissa M. Bilec, William O. Collinge, Xiaobo Xue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With energy security, economic stabilization, and environmental sustainability being at the forefront of US policy making, the development of biodiesel production and use within the United States has been growing at an astonishing rate. According to the latest DOE energy report, biodiesel production and consumption in the US has decreased since its peak in 2008, but still remains an important factor in the US energy mix. However, despite recent studies showing that B5 has similar performance qualities to that of the currently used ultra-low-sulfur petroleum diesel (ULSD) fleet managers and corporations still remain hesitant regarding a switch to B5. This research examined the major areas of concern that arise with transitioning fleets from ULSD to B5 with the goal of alleviating those concerns with quantitative results from an actual fleet implementation and transition. In conjunction with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) a comparison of cost, cold weather fuel properties, engine performance, fuel economy, and maintenance and repairs was conducted using data obtained over 3 years from a pilot study. The results found that B5 performed as well or better than ULSD in all performance metrics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7451-7456
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume38
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biodiesel
diesel
Sulfur
Crude oil
petroleum
sulfur
cost
energy
repair and maintenance
Costs
Energy security
Fuel economy
policy making
Sustainable development
engine
stabilization
Managers
Repair
Stabilization
Switches

Keywords

  • Biodiesel
  • Fleet management
  • Life-cycle costing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

A comparative analysis of performance and cost metrics associated with a diesel to biodiesel fleet transition. / Shrake, Scott O.; Landis, Amy E.; Bilec, Melissa M.; Collinge, William O.; Xue, Xiaobo.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 38, No. 11, 11.2010, p. 7451-7456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shrake, Scott O. ; Landis, Amy E. ; Bilec, Melissa M. ; Collinge, William O. ; Xue, Xiaobo. / A comparative analysis of performance and cost metrics associated with a diesel to biodiesel fleet transition. In: Energy Policy. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 11. pp. 7451-7456.
@article{594d2299258c4b759affe183c024a805,
title = "A comparative analysis of performance and cost metrics associated with a diesel to biodiesel fleet transition",
abstract = "With energy security, economic stabilization, and environmental sustainability being at the forefront of US policy making, the development of biodiesel production and use within the United States has been growing at an astonishing rate. According to the latest DOE energy report, biodiesel production and consumption in the US has decreased since its peak in 2008, but still remains an important factor in the US energy mix. However, despite recent studies showing that B5 has similar performance qualities to that of the currently used ultra-low-sulfur petroleum diesel (ULSD) fleet managers and corporations still remain hesitant regarding a switch to B5. This research examined the major areas of concern that arise with transitioning fleets from ULSD to B5 with the goal of alleviating those concerns with quantitative results from an actual fleet implementation and transition. In conjunction with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) a comparison of cost, cold weather fuel properties, engine performance, fuel economy, and maintenance and repairs was conducted using data obtained over 3 years from a pilot study. The results found that B5 performed as well or better than ULSD in all performance metrics.",
keywords = "Biodiesel, Fleet management, Life-cycle costing",
author = "Shrake, {Scott O.} and Landis, {Amy E.} and Bilec, {Melissa M.} and Collinge, {William O.} and Xiaobo Xue",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "7451--7456",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative analysis of performance and cost metrics associated with a diesel to biodiesel fleet transition

AU - Shrake, Scott O.

AU - Landis, Amy E.

AU - Bilec, Melissa M.

AU - Collinge, William O.

AU - Xue, Xiaobo

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - With energy security, economic stabilization, and environmental sustainability being at the forefront of US policy making, the development of biodiesel production and use within the United States has been growing at an astonishing rate. According to the latest DOE energy report, biodiesel production and consumption in the US has decreased since its peak in 2008, but still remains an important factor in the US energy mix. However, despite recent studies showing that B5 has similar performance qualities to that of the currently used ultra-low-sulfur petroleum diesel (ULSD) fleet managers and corporations still remain hesitant regarding a switch to B5. This research examined the major areas of concern that arise with transitioning fleets from ULSD to B5 with the goal of alleviating those concerns with quantitative results from an actual fleet implementation and transition. In conjunction with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) a comparison of cost, cold weather fuel properties, engine performance, fuel economy, and maintenance and repairs was conducted using data obtained over 3 years from a pilot study. The results found that B5 performed as well or better than ULSD in all performance metrics.

AB - With energy security, economic stabilization, and environmental sustainability being at the forefront of US policy making, the development of biodiesel production and use within the United States has been growing at an astonishing rate. According to the latest DOE energy report, biodiesel production and consumption in the US has decreased since its peak in 2008, but still remains an important factor in the US energy mix. However, despite recent studies showing that B5 has similar performance qualities to that of the currently used ultra-low-sulfur petroleum diesel (ULSD) fleet managers and corporations still remain hesitant regarding a switch to B5. This research examined the major areas of concern that arise with transitioning fleets from ULSD to B5 with the goal of alleviating those concerns with quantitative results from an actual fleet implementation and transition. In conjunction with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) a comparison of cost, cold weather fuel properties, engine performance, fuel economy, and maintenance and repairs was conducted using data obtained over 3 years from a pilot study. The results found that B5 performed as well or better than ULSD in all performance metrics.

KW - Biodiesel

KW - Fleet management

KW - Life-cycle costing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957314869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957314869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.031

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.031

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 7451

EP - 7456

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 11

ER -