A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice

Karen Akerlof, Chris Tyler, Sarah Elizabeth Foxen, Erin Heath, Marga Gual Soler, Alessandro Allegra, Emily T. Cloyd, John A. Hird, Selena M. Nelson, Christina T. Nguyen, Cameryn J. Gonnella, Liam A. Berigan, Carlos R. Abeledo, Tamara Adel Al-Yakoub, Harris Francis Andoh, Laura dos Santos Boeira, Pieter van Boheemen, Paul Cairney, Robert Cook-Deegan, Gavin CostiganMeghnath Dhimal, Martín Hernán Di Marco, Donatus Dube, Abiodun Egbetokun, Jauad El Kharraz, Liliana Estrada Galindo, Mark W.J. Ferguson, José Franco, Zach Graves, Emily Hayter, Alma Cristal Hernández-Mondragón, Abbi D. Hobbs, Kerry L. Holden, Carel IJsselmuiden, Ayodele Samuel Jegede, Snezana B. Krstic, Jean Marie Mbonyintwali, Sisay Derso Mengesha, Tomas Michalek, Hiroshi Nagano, Michael Nentwich, Ali Nouri, Peter Dithan Ntale, Olusegun M. Ogundele, Jude Tochukwu Omenma, Louis François Pau, Jon M. Peha, Elizabeth M. Prescott, Irene Ramos-Vielba, Raimundo Roberts, Paul A. Sandifer, Marc Albert Saner, Edmond Sanganyado, Maruf Sanni, Orlando Santillán, Deborah D. Stine, Miron L. Straf, Peter Tangney, Carla Leanne Washbourne, Wim Winderickx, Masaru Yarime

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The quantity and complexity of scientific and technological information provided to policymakers have been on the rise for decades. Yet little is known about how to provide science advice to legislatures, even though scientific information is widely acknowledged as valuable for decision-making in many policy domains. We asked academics, science advisers, and policymakers from both developed and developing nations to identify, review and refine, and then rank the most pressing research questions on legislative science advice (LSA). Experts generally agree that the state of evidence is poor, especially regarding developing and lower-middle income countries. Many fundamental questions about science advice processes remain unanswered and are of great interest: whether legislative use of scientific evidence improves the implementation and outcome of social programs and policies; under what conditions legislators and staff seek out scientific information or use what is presented to them; and how different communication channels affect informational trust and use. Environment and health are the highest priority policy domains for the field. The context-specific nature of many of the submitted questions—whether to policy issues, institutions, or locations—suggests one of the significant challenges is aggregating generalizable evidence on LSA practices. Understanding these research needs represents a first step in advancing a global agenda for LSA research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number108
JournalPalgrave Communications
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

science
Research
evidence
Health Priorities
Public Policy
Developed Countries
Developing Countries
Research agenda
International research
Research Agenda
Decision Making
Communication
expert
staff
decision making
income
Politicians
communication
health
Developing nations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Akerlof, K., Tyler, C., Foxen, S. E., Heath, E., Gual Soler, M., Allegra, A., ... Yarime, M. (2019). A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), [108]. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice. / Akerlof, Karen; Tyler, Chris; Foxen, Sarah Elizabeth; Heath, Erin; Gual Soler, Marga; Allegra, Alessandro; Cloyd, Emily T.; Hird, John A.; Nelson, Selena M.; Nguyen, Christina T.; Gonnella, Cameryn J.; Berigan, Liam A.; Abeledo, Carlos R.; Al-Yakoub, Tamara Adel; Andoh, Harris Francis; dos Santos Boeira, Laura; van Boheemen, Pieter; Cairney, Paul; Cook-Deegan, Robert; Costigan, Gavin; Dhimal, Meghnath; Di Marco, Martín Hernán; Dube, Donatus; Egbetokun, Abiodun; El Kharraz, Jauad; Galindo, Liliana Estrada; Ferguson, Mark W.J.; Franco, José; Graves, Zach; Hayter, Emily; Hernández-Mondragón, Alma Cristal; Hobbs, Abbi D.; Holden, Kerry L.; IJsselmuiden, Carel; Jegede, Ayodele Samuel; Krstic, Snezana B.; Mbonyintwali, Jean Marie; Mengesha, Sisay Derso; Michalek, Tomas; Nagano, Hiroshi; Nentwich, Michael; Nouri, Ali; Ntale, Peter Dithan; Ogundele, Olusegun M.; Omenma, Jude Tochukwu; Pau, Louis François; Peha, Jon M.; Prescott, Elizabeth M.; Ramos-Vielba, Irene; Roberts, Raimundo; Sandifer, Paul A.; Saner, Marc Albert; Sanganyado, Edmond; Sanni, Maruf; Santillán, Orlando; Stine, Deborah D.; Straf, Miron L.; Tangney, Peter; Washbourne, Carla Leanne; Winderickx, Wim; Yarime, Masaru.

In: Palgrave Communications, Vol. 5, No. 1, 108, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Akerlof, K, Tyler, C, Foxen, SE, Heath, E, Gual Soler, M, Allegra, A, Cloyd, ET, Hird, JA, Nelson, SM, Nguyen, CT, Gonnella, CJ, Berigan, LA, Abeledo, CR, Al-Yakoub, TA, Andoh, HF, dos Santos Boeira, L, van Boheemen, P, Cairney, P, Cook-Deegan, R, Costigan, G, Dhimal, M, Di Marco, MH, Dube, D, Egbetokun, A, El Kharraz, J, Galindo, LE, Ferguson, MWJ, Franco, J, Graves, Z, Hayter, E, Hernández-Mondragón, AC, Hobbs, AD, Holden, KL, IJsselmuiden, C, Jegede, AS, Krstic, SB, Mbonyintwali, JM, Mengesha, SD, Michalek, T, Nagano, H, Nentwich, M, Nouri, A, Ntale, PD, Ogundele, OM, Omenma, JT, Pau, LF, Peha, JM, Prescott, EM, Ramos-Vielba, I, Roberts, R, Sandifer, PA, Saner, MA, Sanganyado, E, Sanni, M, Santillán, O, Stine, DD, Straf, ML, Tangney, P, Washbourne, CL, Winderickx, W & Yarime, M 2019, 'A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice', Palgrave Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, 108. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6
Akerlof, Karen ; Tyler, Chris ; Foxen, Sarah Elizabeth ; Heath, Erin ; Gual Soler, Marga ; Allegra, Alessandro ; Cloyd, Emily T. ; Hird, John A. ; Nelson, Selena M. ; Nguyen, Christina T. ; Gonnella, Cameryn J. ; Berigan, Liam A. ; Abeledo, Carlos R. ; Al-Yakoub, Tamara Adel ; Andoh, Harris Francis ; dos Santos Boeira, Laura ; van Boheemen, Pieter ; Cairney, Paul ; Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Costigan, Gavin ; Dhimal, Meghnath ; Di Marco, Martín Hernán ; Dube, Donatus ; Egbetokun, Abiodun ; El Kharraz, Jauad ; Galindo, Liliana Estrada ; Ferguson, Mark W.J. ; Franco, José ; Graves, Zach ; Hayter, Emily ; Hernández-Mondragón, Alma Cristal ; Hobbs, Abbi D. ; Holden, Kerry L. ; IJsselmuiden, Carel ; Jegede, Ayodele Samuel ; Krstic, Snezana B. ; Mbonyintwali, Jean Marie ; Mengesha, Sisay Derso ; Michalek, Tomas ; Nagano, Hiroshi ; Nentwich, Michael ; Nouri, Ali ; Ntale, Peter Dithan ; Ogundele, Olusegun M. ; Omenma, Jude Tochukwu ; Pau, Louis François ; Peha, Jon M. ; Prescott, Elizabeth M. ; Ramos-Vielba, Irene ; Roberts, Raimundo ; Sandifer, Paul A. ; Saner, Marc Albert ; Sanganyado, Edmond ; Sanni, Maruf ; Santillán, Orlando ; Stine, Deborah D. ; Straf, Miron L. ; Tangney, Peter ; Washbourne, Carla Leanne ; Winderickx, Wim ; Yarime, Masaru. / A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice. In: Palgrave Communications. 2019 ; Vol. 5, No. 1.
@article{eca7cf94ebee4ebabbec5b02059043bb,
title = "A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice",
abstract = "The quantity and complexity of scientific and technological information provided to policymakers have been on the rise for decades. Yet little is known about how to provide science advice to legislatures, even though scientific information is widely acknowledged as valuable for decision-making in many policy domains. We asked academics, science advisers, and policymakers from both developed and developing nations to identify, review and refine, and then rank the most pressing research questions on legislative science advice (LSA). Experts generally agree that the state of evidence is poor, especially regarding developing and lower-middle income countries. Many fundamental questions about science advice processes remain unanswered and are of great interest: whether legislative use of scientific evidence improves the implementation and outcome of social programs and policies; under what conditions legislators and staff seek out scientific information or use what is presented to them; and how different communication channels affect informational trust and use. Environment and health are the highest priority policy domains for the field. The context-specific nature of many of the submitted questions—whether to policy issues, institutions, or locations—suggests one of the significant challenges is aggregating generalizable evidence on LSA practices. Understanding these research needs represents a first step in advancing a global agenda for LSA research.",
author = "Karen Akerlof and Chris Tyler and Foxen, {Sarah Elizabeth} and Erin Heath and {Gual Soler}, Marga and Alessandro Allegra and Cloyd, {Emily T.} and Hird, {John A.} and Nelson, {Selena M.} and Nguyen, {Christina T.} and Gonnella, {Cameryn J.} and Berigan, {Liam A.} and Abeledo, {Carlos R.} and Al-Yakoub, {Tamara Adel} and Andoh, {Harris Francis} and {dos Santos Boeira}, Laura and {van Boheemen}, Pieter and Paul Cairney and Robert Cook-Deegan and Gavin Costigan and Meghnath Dhimal and {Di Marco}, {Mart{\'i}n Hern{\'a}n} and Donatus Dube and Abiodun Egbetokun and {El Kharraz}, Jauad and Galindo, {Liliana Estrada} and Ferguson, {Mark W.J.} and Jos{\'e} Franco and Zach Graves and Emily Hayter and Hern{\'a}ndez-Mondrag{\'o}n, {Alma Cristal} and Hobbs, {Abbi D.} and Holden, {Kerry L.} and Carel IJsselmuiden and Jegede, {Ayodele Samuel} and Krstic, {Snezana B.} and Mbonyintwali, {Jean Marie} and Mengesha, {Sisay Derso} and Tomas Michalek and Hiroshi Nagano and Michael Nentwich and Ali Nouri and Ntale, {Peter Dithan} and Ogundele, {Olusegun M.} and Omenma, {Jude Tochukwu} and Pau, {Louis Fran{\cc}ois} and Peha, {Jon M.} and Prescott, {Elizabeth M.} and Irene Ramos-Vielba and Raimundo Roberts and Sandifer, {Paul A.} and Saner, {Marc Albert} and Edmond Sanganyado and Maruf Sanni and Orlando Santill{\'a}n and Stine, {Deborah D.} and Straf, {Miron L.} and Peter Tangney and Washbourne, {Carla Leanne} and Wim Winderickx and Masaru Yarime",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Palgrave Communications",
issn = "2055-1045",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice

AU - Akerlof, Karen

AU - Tyler, Chris

AU - Foxen, Sarah Elizabeth

AU - Heath, Erin

AU - Gual Soler, Marga

AU - Allegra, Alessandro

AU - Cloyd, Emily T.

AU - Hird, John A.

AU - Nelson, Selena M.

AU - Nguyen, Christina T.

AU - Gonnella, Cameryn J.

AU - Berigan, Liam A.

AU - Abeledo, Carlos R.

AU - Al-Yakoub, Tamara Adel

AU - Andoh, Harris Francis

AU - dos Santos Boeira, Laura

AU - van Boheemen, Pieter

AU - Cairney, Paul

AU - Cook-Deegan, Robert

AU - Costigan, Gavin

AU - Dhimal, Meghnath

AU - Di Marco, Martín Hernán

AU - Dube, Donatus

AU - Egbetokun, Abiodun

AU - El Kharraz, Jauad

AU - Galindo, Liliana Estrada

AU - Ferguson, Mark W.J.

AU - Franco, José

AU - Graves, Zach

AU - Hayter, Emily

AU - Hernández-Mondragón, Alma Cristal

AU - Hobbs, Abbi D.

AU - Holden, Kerry L.

AU - IJsselmuiden, Carel

AU - Jegede, Ayodele Samuel

AU - Krstic, Snezana B.

AU - Mbonyintwali, Jean Marie

AU - Mengesha, Sisay Derso

AU - Michalek, Tomas

AU - Nagano, Hiroshi

AU - Nentwich, Michael

AU - Nouri, Ali

AU - Ntale, Peter Dithan

AU - Ogundele, Olusegun M.

AU - Omenma, Jude Tochukwu

AU - Pau, Louis François

AU - Peha, Jon M.

AU - Prescott, Elizabeth M.

AU - Ramos-Vielba, Irene

AU - Roberts, Raimundo

AU - Sandifer, Paul A.

AU - Saner, Marc Albert

AU - Sanganyado, Edmond

AU - Sanni, Maruf

AU - Santillán, Orlando

AU - Stine, Deborah D.

AU - Straf, Miron L.

AU - Tangney, Peter

AU - Washbourne, Carla Leanne

AU - Winderickx, Wim

AU - Yarime, Masaru

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - The quantity and complexity of scientific and technological information provided to policymakers have been on the rise for decades. Yet little is known about how to provide science advice to legislatures, even though scientific information is widely acknowledged as valuable for decision-making in many policy domains. We asked academics, science advisers, and policymakers from both developed and developing nations to identify, review and refine, and then rank the most pressing research questions on legislative science advice (LSA). Experts generally agree that the state of evidence is poor, especially regarding developing and lower-middle income countries. Many fundamental questions about science advice processes remain unanswered and are of great interest: whether legislative use of scientific evidence improves the implementation and outcome of social programs and policies; under what conditions legislators and staff seek out scientific information or use what is presented to them; and how different communication channels affect informational trust and use. Environment and health are the highest priority policy domains for the field. The context-specific nature of many of the submitted questions—whether to policy issues, institutions, or locations—suggests one of the significant challenges is aggregating generalizable evidence on LSA practices. Understanding these research needs represents a first step in advancing a global agenda for LSA research.

AB - The quantity and complexity of scientific and technological information provided to policymakers have been on the rise for decades. Yet little is known about how to provide science advice to legislatures, even though scientific information is widely acknowledged as valuable for decision-making in many policy domains. We asked academics, science advisers, and policymakers from both developed and developing nations to identify, review and refine, and then rank the most pressing research questions on legislative science advice (LSA). Experts generally agree that the state of evidence is poor, especially regarding developing and lower-middle income countries. Many fundamental questions about science advice processes remain unanswered and are of great interest: whether legislative use of scientific evidence improves the implementation and outcome of social programs and policies; under what conditions legislators and staff seek out scientific information or use what is presented to them; and how different communication channels affect informational trust and use. Environment and health are the highest priority policy domains for the field. The context-specific nature of many of the submitted questions—whether to policy issues, institutions, or locations—suggests one of the significant challenges is aggregating generalizable evidence on LSA practices. Understanding these research needs represents a first step in advancing a global agenda for LSA research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073078420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073078420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

DO - 10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073078420

VL - 5

JO - Palgrave Communications

JF - Palgrave Communications

SN - 2055-1045

IS - 1

M1 - 108

ER -