Abstract

As a consequence of the U.S. effort to increase infrastructure security and resilience, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other U.S. federal agencies have identified 16 critical infrastructure sectors that are considered vital to the nation’s well-being in terms of economic security, public health, and safety. However, there remains no articulated set of values that justify this particular list of infrastructure systems or how decision-makers might prioritize investments towards one critical sector over another during a crisis. To offer a more integrated and holistic approach to critical infrastructure resilience, this research employs the capabilities approach to human development, which offers an alternative view of critical infrastructure that focuses on the services that infrastructure provides rather than its physical condition or vulnerability to threats. This service-based perspective of infrastructure emphasizes the role of infrastructure in enabling and supporting central human capabilities that build adaptive capacity and improve human well-being. We argue that the most critical infrastructure systems are those that are essential for providing and/or supporting central human capabilities. This paper examines the DHS designation of criticality from a capabilities perspective and argues for a capabilities basis for making distinctions between those systems that should be considered most critical and those that might be temporarily sacrificed. A key implication of this work is that an across sector approach is required to reorganize existing critical infrastructure efforts around the most valuable infrastructure end-services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironment Systems and Decisions
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 7 2018

Fingerprint

prioritization
infrastructure
holistic approach
health and safety
integrated approach
public health
vulnerability

Keywords

  • Capability approach
  • Critical infrastructure
  • Human development
  • Infrastructure criticality
  • Infrastructure services
  • Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

A capabilities approach to the prioritization of critical infrastructure. / Clark, Susan Spierre; Seager, Thomas; Chester, Mikhail.

In: Environment Systems and Decisions, 07.06.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{253ce226c86a41388ee88e081fbc4684,
title = "A capabilities approach to the prioritization of critical infrastructure",
abstract = "As a consequence of the U.S. effort to increase infrastructure security and resilience, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other U.S. federal agencies have identified 16 critical infrastructure sectors that are considered vital to the nation’s well-being in terms of economic security, public health, and safety. However, there remains no articulated set of values that justify this particular list of infrastructure systems or how decision-makers might prioritize investments towards one critical sector over another during a crisis. To offer a more integrated and holistic approach to critical infrastructure resilience, this research employs the capabilities approach to human development, which offers an alternative view of critical infrastructure that focuses on the services that infrastructure provides rather than its physical condition or vulnerability to threats. This service-based perspective of infrastructure emphasizes the role of infrastructure in enabling and supporting central human capabilities that build adaptive capacity and improve human well-being. We argue that the most critical infrastructure systems are those that are essential for providing and/or supporting central human capabilities. This paper examines the DHS designation of criticality from a capabilities perspective and argues for a capabilities basis for making distinctions between those systems that should be considered most critical and those that might be temporarily sacrificed. A key implication of this work is that an across sector approach is required to reorganize existing critical infrastructure efforts around the most valuable infrastructure end-services.",
keywords = "Capability approach, Critical infrastructure, Human development, Infrastructure criticality, Infrastructure services, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs",
author = "Clark, {Susan Spierre} and Thomas Seager and Mikhail Chester",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10669-018-9691-8",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Environment Systems and Decisions",
issn = "2194-5403",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A capabilities approach to the prioritization of critical infrastructure

AU - Clark, Susan Spierre

AU - Seager, Thomas

AU - Chester, Mikhail

PY - 2018/6/7

Y1 - 2018/6/7

N2 - As a consequence of the U.S. effort to increase infrastructure security and resilience, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other U.S. federal agencies have identified 16 critical infrastructure sectors that are considered vital to the nation’s well-being in terms of economic security, public health, and safety. However, there remains no articulated set of values that justify this particular list of infrastructure systems or how decision-makers might prioritize investments towards one critical sector over another during a crisis. To offer a more integrated and holistic approach to critical infrastructure resilience, this research employs the capabilities approach to human development, which offers an alternative view of critical infrastructure that focuses on the services that infrastructure provides rather than its physical condition or vulnerability to threats. This service-based perspective of infrastructure emphasizes the role of infrastructure in enabling and supporting central human capabilities that build adaptive capacity and improve human well-being. We argue that the most critical infrastructure systems are those that are essential for providing and/or supporting central human capabilities. This paper examines the DHS designation of criticality from a capabilities perspective and argues for a capabilities basis for making distinctions between those systems that should be considered most critical and those that might be temporarily sacrificed. A key implication of this work is that an across sector approach is required to reorganize existing critical infrastructure efforts around the most valuable infrastructure end-services.

AB - As a consequence of the U.S. effort to increase infrastructure security and resilience, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other U.S. federal agencies have identified 16 critical infrastructure sectors that are considered vital to the nation’s well-being in terms of economic security, public health, and safety. However, there remains no articulated set of values that justify this particular list of infrastructure systems or how decision-makers might prioritize investments towards one critical sector over another during a crisis. To offer a more integrated and holistic approach to critical infrastructure resilience, this research employs the capabilities approach to human development, which offers an alternative view of critical infrastructure that focuses on the services that infrastructure provides rather than its physical condition or vulnerability to threats. This service-based perspective of infrastructure emphasizes the role of infrastructure in enabling and supporting central human capabilities that build adaptive capacity and improve human well-being. We argue that the most critical infrastructure systems are those that are essential for providing and/or supporting central human capabilities. This paper examines the DHS designation of criticality from a capabilities perspective and argues for a capabilities basis for making distinctions between those systems that should be considered most critical and those that might be temporarily sacrificed. A key implication of this work is that an across sector approach is required to reorganize existing critical infrastructure efforts around the most valuable infrastructure end-services.

KW - Capability approach

KW - Critical infrastructure

KW - Human development

KW - Infrastructure criticality

KW - Infrastructure services

KW - Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048092701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048092701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10669-018-9691-8

DO - 10.1007/s10669-018-9691-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048092701

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Environment Systems and Decisions

JF - Environment Systems and Decisions

SN - 2194-5403

ER -