360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness

Joan Brett, Leanne E. Atwater

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

260 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined how 360° feedback ratings and self-other rating discrepancies related to reactions to feedback, perceptions of feedback accuracy, perceived usefulness of the feedback, and recipients' receptivity to development. The results indicated that less favorable ratings were related to beliefs that feedback was less accurate and to negative reactions. Negative reactions and perceptions that feedback was less accurate were related to beliefs that the feedback was less useful. Those who found feedback less useful were perceived by a facilitator as less development-focused. Goal orientation did not moderate the relationship between ratings and perceptions of accuracy or reactions to feedback. Goal orientation was related to perceptions of usefulness of the process several weeks after receipt of feedback. The results question widely held assumptions about 360° feedback that negative and discrepant feedback motivates positive change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)930-942
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume86
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

360° feedback : Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. / Brett, Joan; Atwater, Leanne E.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 5, 01.01.2001, p. 930-942.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64d3b0c788ce41d1b260f947c246e737,
title = "360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness",
abstract = "This study examined how 360° feedback ratings and self-other rating discrepancies related to reactions to feedback, perceptions of feedback accuracy, perceived usefulness of the feedback, and recipients' receptivity to development. The results indicated that less favorable ratings were related to beliefs that feedback was less accurate and to negative reactions. Negative reactions and perceptions that feedback was less accurate were related to beliefs that the feedback was less useful. Those who found feedback less useful were perceived by a facilitator as less development-focused. Goal orientation did not moderate the relationship between ratings and perceptions of accuracy or reactions to feedback. Goal orientation was related to perceptions of usefulness of the process several weeks after receipt of feedback. The results question widely held assumptions about 360° feedback that negative and discrepant feedback motivates positive change.",
author = "Joan Brett and Atwater, {Leanne E.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "930--942",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 360° feedback

T2 - Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness

AU - Brett, Joan

AU - Atwater, Leanne E.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This study examined how 360° feedback ratings and self-other rating discrepancies related to reactions to feedback, perceptions of feedback accuracy, perceived usefulness of the feedback, and recipients' receptivity to development. The results indicated that less favorable ratings were related to beliefs that feedback was less accurate and to negative reactions. Negative reactions and perceptions that feedback was less accurate were related to beliefs that the feedback was less useful. Those who found feedback less useful were perceived by a facilitator as less development-focused. Goal orientation did not moderate the relationship between ratings and perceptions of accuracy or reactions to feedback. Goal orientation was related to perceptions of usefulness of the process several weeks after receipt of feedback. The results question widely held assumptions about 360° feedback that negative and discrepant feedback motivates positive change.

AB - This study examined how 360° feedback ratings and self-other rating discrepancies related to reactions to feedback, perceptions of feedback accuracy, perceived usefulness of the feedback, and recipients' receptivity to development. The results indicated that less favorable ratings were related to beliefs that feedback was less accurate and to negative reactions. Negative reactions and perceptions that feedback was less accurate were related to beliefs that the feedback was less useful. Those who found feedback less useful were perceived by a facilitator as less development-focused. Goal orientation did not moderate the relationship between ratings and perceptions of accuracy or reactions to feedback. Goal orientation was related to perceptions of usefulness of the process several weeks after receipt of feedback. The results question widely held assumptions about 360° feedback that negative and discrepant feedback motivates positive change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047683530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047683530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930

M3 - Article

C2 - 11596809

AN - SCOPUS:85047683530

VL - 86

SP - 930

EP - 942

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 5

ER -