Youth co-offending networks: An investigation of social and spatial effects

David R. Schaefer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research tests the relative contribution of social distance and spatial distance to the presence of ties between neighborhoods based on youth co-offending. Using official court data from a large U.S. metropolitan area, a set of dyad independence and exponential random graph models are estimated in order to investigate the characteristics of neighborhoods that foster co-offending. Results reveal significant effects of both social and spatial distance. Social distance contributes to network structure net of spatial proximity, though spatial factors better explain the overall network structure. These results have methodological implications for the analysis of spatial effects and criminal behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-149
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Networks
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Social Distance
social distance
criminality
Spatial Behavior
dyad
agglomeration area
Research

Keywords

  • Community structure
  • Crime
  • ERGM
  • Neighborhoods
  • Social distance
  • Spatial proximity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Anthropology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Youth co-offending networks : An investigation of social and spatial effects. / Schaefer, David R.

In: Social Networks, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 141-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schaefer, David R. / Youth co-offending networks : An investigation of social and spatial effects. In: Social Networks. 2012 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 141-149.
@article{cb3a6a12534942d8a3f1f2cf86a143f2,
title = "Youth co-offending networks: An investigation of social and spatial effects",
abstract = "This research tests the relative contribution of social distance and spatial distance to the presence of ties between neighborhoods based on youth co-offending. Using official court data from a large U.S. metropolitan area, a set of dyad independence and exponential random graph models are estimated in order to investigate the characteristics of neighborhoods that foster co-offending. Results reveal significant effects of both social and spatial distance. Social distance contributes to network structure net of spatial proximity, though spatial factors better explain the overall network structure. These results have methodological implications for the analysis of spatial effects and criminal behavior.",
keywords = "Community structure, Crime, ERGM, Neighborhoods, Social distance, Spatial proximity",
author = "Schaefer, {David R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socnet.2011.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "141--149",
journal = "Social Networks",
issn = "0378-8733",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Youth co-offending networks

T2 - An investigation of social and spatial effects

AU - Schaefer, David R.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - This research tests the relative contribution of social distance and spatial distance to the presence of ties between neighborhoods based on youth co-offending. Using official court data from a large U.S. metropolitan area, a set of dyad independence and exponential random graph models are estimated in order to investigate the characteristics of neighborhoods that foster co-offending. Results reveal significant effects of both social and spatial distance. Social distance contributes to network structure net of spatial proximity, though spatial factors better explain the overall network structure. These results have methodological implications for the analysis of spatial effects and criminal behavior.

AB - This research tests the relative contribution of social distance and spatial distance to the presence of ties between neighborhoods based on youth co-offending. Using official court data from a large U.S. metropolitan area, a set of dyad independence and exponential random graph models are estimated in order to investigate the characteristics of neighborhoods that foster co-offending. Results reveal significant effects of both social and spatial distance. Social distance contributes to network structure net of spatial proximity, though spatial factors better explain the overall network structure. These results have methodological implications for the analysis of spatial effects and criminal behavior.

KW - Community structure

KW - Crime

KW - ERGM

KW - Neighborhoods

KW - Social distance

KW - Spatial proximity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855198673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855198673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.02.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84855198673

VL - 34

SP - 141

EP - 149

JO - Social Networks

JF - Social Networks

SN - 0378-8733

IS - 1

ER -