Writing to learn in science: Effects on Grade 4 students' understanding of balance

Amy Gillespie Rouse, Stephen Graham, Donald Compton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we randomly assigned 69 Grade 4 students to a writing-to-learn treatment (n = 23), comparison (n = 23), or no-treatment control (n = 23). Treatment and comparison students completed a science experiment involving balance. During the experiment, treatment students wrote four short responses and an extended response to document their learning. To control for writing time, comparison students wrote four short responses and an extended response about topics other than balance. On a 20-item balance knowledge posttest, control outperformed treatment (d = 0.89) and comparison (d = 1.05) on the lowest level balance questions (Level 1). At the highest level questions, Levels 3 and 4, treatment (ds = 1.42 and 0.94) and comparison (ds = 1.62 and 1.37) outperformed control. There were no significant differences in total words written or level of balance understanding on a posttest written response. The performance of individual responders to treatment is also discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Educational Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 8 2016

Fingerprint

school grade
science
student
experiment
learning
performance

Keywords

  • Elementary
  • science
  • writing
  • writing to learn

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Writing to learn in science : Effects on Grade 4 students' understanding of balance. / Gillespie Rouse, Amy; Graham, Stephen; Compton, Donald.

In: Journal of Educational Research, 08.09.2016, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{edb91b23e2f14d6199dbdd349a1a0e15,
title = "Writing to learn in science: Effects on Grade 4 students' understanding of balance",
abstract = "In this study, we randomly assigned 69 Grade 4 students to a writing-to-learn treatment (n = 23), comparison (n = 23), or no-treatment control (n = 23). Treatment and comparison students completed a science experiment involving balance. During the experiment, treatment students wrote four short responses and an extended response to document their learning. To control for writing time, comparison students wrote four short responses and an extended response about topics other than balance. On a 20-item balance knowledge posttest, control outperformed treatment (d = 0.89) and comparison (d = 1.05) on the lowest level balance questions (Level 1). At the highest level questions, Levels 3 and 4, treatment (ds = 1.42 and 0.94) and comparison (ds = 1.62 and 1.37) outperformed control. There were no significant differences in total words written or level of balance understanding on a posttest written response. The performance of individual responders to treatment is also discussed.",
keywords = "Elementary, science, writing, writing to learn",
author = "{Gillespie Rouse}, Amy and Stephen Graham and Donald Compton",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/00220671.2015.1103688",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0022-0671",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Writing to learn in science

T2 - Effects on Grade 4 students' understanding of balance

AU - Gillespie Rouse, Amy

AU - Graham, Stephen

AU - Compton, Donald

PY - 2016/9/8

Y1 - 2016/9/8

N2 - In this study, we randomly assigned 69 Grade 4 students to a writing-to-learn treatment (n = 23), comparison (n = 23), or no-treatment control (n = 23). Treatment and comparison students completed a science experiment involving balance. During the experiment, treatment students wrote four short responses and an extended response to document their learning. To control for writing time, comparison students wrote four short responses and an extended response about topics other than balance. On a 20-item balance knowledge posttest, control outperformed treatment (d = 0.89) and comparison (d = 1.05) on the lowest level balance questions (Level 1). At the highest level questions, Levels 3 and 4, treatment (ds = 1.42 and 0.94) and comparison (ds = 1.62 and 1.37) outperformed control. There were no significant differences in total words written or level of balance understanding on a posttest written response. The performance of individual responders to treatment is also discussed.

AB - In this study, we randomly assigned 69 Grade 4 students to a writing-to-learn treatment (n = 23), comparison (n = 23), or no-treatment control (n = 23). Treatment and comparison students completed a science experiment involving balance. During the experiment, treatment students wrote four short responses and an extended response to document their learning. To control for writing time, comparison students wrote four short responses and an extended response about topics other than balance. On a 20-item balance knowledge posttest, control outperformed treatment (d = 0.89) and comparison (d = 1.05) on the lowest level balance questions (Level 1). At the highest level questions, Levels 3 and 4, treatment (ds = 1.42 and 0.94) and comparison (ds = 1.62 and 1.37) outperformed control. There were no significant differences in total words written or level of balance understanding on a posttest written response. The performance of individual responders to treatment is also discussed.

KW - Elementary

KW - science

KW - writing

KW - writing to learn

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987923891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987923891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00220671.2015.1103688

DO - 10.1080/00220671.2015.1103688

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84987923891

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Educational Research

JF - Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0022-0671

ER -