Working at the crossroads of pleasure and danger: Feminist perspectives on doing critical sexuality studies

Breanne Fahs, Rebecca F. Plante, Sara I. McClelland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For those entering the field of sexuality studies, there is often little advice or guidance on the many facets of the work, some of which are pleasurable and some of which are dangerous. Drawing from our personal and professional conflicts surrounding our work as feminist psychologists and sociologists studying women’s sexuality, we extend Carole Vance’s (1984) claims about pleasure and danger by arguing that, for the sex researcher, pleasure and danger are in fact inverted. That which should give us pleasure (e.g. having our work promoted to the public; teaching critical material about sexuality; thinking deeply about our personal relationships) ends up feeling dangerous, and that which should feel dangerous (e.g. saying and doing and working on taboo things; calling out homophobia, racism, classism, and sexism) ends up giving us pleasure. We examine several areas where we experience personal and professional costs and benefits of doing feminist sex research, including relationships with partners, communication with research participants, pedagogical challenges and conflicts, the interface between the sex-researcher identity and university/institutional practices, and, finally, our interface with the public world and the mass media. In doing so, we aim to use our personal experiences to highlight just a few of the areas that emerging sexuality researchers may encounter. In addition, we extend Vance’s framework of pleasure and danger beyond the experiences of women having sex and into the realm of those seeking to understand, research, write about, theorize, and assess the complicated terrain of women’s sexuality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-519
Number of pages17
JournalSexualities
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

sexuality
experience
sexism
mass media
psychologist
sociologist
racism
university
communication
Teaching
costs

Keywords

  • Academia
  • critical feminist sex research
  • danger
  • feminist methods
  • feminist pedagogy
  • pleasure
  • women’s sexuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Working at the crossroads of pleasure and danger : Feminist perspectives on doing critical sexuality studies. / Fahs, Breanne; Plante, Rebecca F.; McClelland, Sara I.

In: Sexualities, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.06.2018, p. 503-519.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fahs, Breanne ; Plante, Rebecca F. ; McClelland, Sara I. / Working at the crossroads of pleasure and danger : Feminist perspectives on doing critical sexuality studies. In: Sexualities. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 503-519.
@article{20792ebbcb38415fa8341fbc075a1abf,
title = "Working at the crossroads of pleasure and danger: Feminist perspectives on doing critical sexuality studies",
abstract = "For those entering the field of sexuality studies, there is often little advice or guidance on the many facets of the work, some of which are pleasurable and some of which are dangerous. Drawing from our personal and professional conflicts surrounding our work as feminist psychologists and sociologists studying women’s sexuality, we extend Carole Vance’s (1984) claims about pleasure and danger by arguing that, for the sex researcher, pleasure and danger are in fact inverted. That which should give us pleasure (e.g. having our work promoted to the public; teaching critical material about sexuality; thinking deeply about our personal relationships) ends up feeling dangerous, and that which should feel dangerous (e.g. saying and doing and working on taboo things; calling out homophobia, racism, classism, and sexism) ends up giving us pleasure. We examine several areas where we experience personal and professional costs and benefits of doing feminist sex research, including relationships with partners, communication with research participants, pedagogical challenges and conflicts, the interface between the sex-researcher identity and university/institutional practices, and, finally, our interface with the public world and the mass media. In doing so, we aim to use our personal experiences to highlight just a few of the areas that emerging sexuality researchers may encounter. In addition, we extend Vance’s framework of pleasure and danger beyond the experiences of women having sex and into the realm of those seeking to understand, research, write about, theorize, and assess the complicated terrain of women’s sexuality.",
keywords = "Academia, critical feminist sex research, danger, feminist methods, feminist pedagogy, pleasure, women’s sexuality",
author = "Breanne Fahs and Plante, {Rebecca F.} and McClelland, {Sara I.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1363460717713743",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "503--519",
journal = "Sexualities",
issn = "1363-4607",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working at the crossroads of pleasure and danger

T2 - Feminist perspectives on doing critical sexuality studies

AU - Fahs, Breanne

AU - Plante, Rebecca F.

AU - McClelland, Sara I.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - For those entering the field of sexuality studies, there is often little advice or guidance on the many facets of the work, some of which are pleasurable and some of which are dangerous. Drawing from our personal and professional conflicts surrounding our work as feminist psychologists and sociologists studying women’s sexuality, we extend Carole Vance’s (1984) claims about pleasure and danger by arguing that, for the sex researcher, pleasure and danger are in fact inverted. That which should give us pleasure (e.g. having our work promoted to the public; teaching critical material about sexuality; thinking deeply about our personal relationships) ends up feeling dangerous, and that which should feel dangerous (e.g. saying and doing and working on taboo things; calling out homophobia, racism, classism, and sexism) ends up giving us pleasure. We examine several areas where we experience personal and professional costs and benefits of doing feminist sex research, including relationships with partners, communication with research participants, pedagogical challenges and conflicts, the interface between the sex-researcher identity and university/institutional practices, and, finally, our interface with the public world and the mass media. In doing so, we aim to use our personal experiences to highlight just a few of the areas that emerging sexuality researchers may encounter. In addition, we extend Vance’s framework of pleasure and danger beyond the experiences of women having sex and into the realm of those seeking to understand, research, write about, theorize, and assess the complicated terrain of women’s sexuality.

AB - For those entering the field of sexuality studies, there is often little advice or guidance on the many facets of the work, some of which are pleasurable and some of which are dangerous. Drawing from our personal and professional conflicts surrounding our work as feminist psychologists and sociologists studying women’s sexuality, we extend Carole Vance’s (1984) claims about pleasure and danger by arguing that, for the sex researcher, pleasure and danger are in fact inverted. That which should give us pleasure (e.g. having our work promoted to the public; teaching critical material about sexuality; thinking deeply about our personal relationships) ends up feeling dangerous, and that which should feel dangerous (e.g. saying and doing and working on taboo things; calling out homophobia, racism, classism, and sexism) ends up giving us pleasure. We examine several areas where we experience personal and professional costs and benefits of doing feminist sex research, including relationships with partners, communication with research participants, pedagogical challenges and conflicts, the interface between the sex-researcher identity and university/institutional practices, and, finally, our interface with the public world and the mass media. In doing so, we aim to use our personal experiences to highlight just a few of the areas that emerging sexuality researchers may encounter. In addition, we extend Vance’s framework of pleasure and danger beyond the experiences of women having sex and into the realm of those seeking to understand, research, write about, theorize, and assess the complicated terrain of women’s sexuality.

KW - Academia

KW - critical feminist sex research

KW - danger

KW - feminist methods

KW - feminist pedagogy

KW - pleasure

KW - women’s sexuality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046820260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046820260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1363460717713743

DO - 10.1177/1363460717713743

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046820260

VL - 21

SP - 503

EP - 519

JO - Sexualities

JF - Sexualities

SN - 1363-4607

IS - 4

ER -