Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings

Paul Morphy, Stephen Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since its advent word processing has become a common writing tool, providing potential advantages over writing by hand. Word processors permit easy revision, produce legible characters quickly, and may provide additional supports (e.g., spellcheckers, speech recognition). Such advantages should remedy common difficulties among weaker writers/readers in grades 1-12. Based on 27 studies with weaker writers, 20 of which were not considered in prior reviews, findings from this meta-analysis support this proposition. From 77 independent effects, the following average effects were greater than zero: writing quality (d = 0.52), length (d = 0.48), development/organization of text (d = 0.66), mechanical correctness (d = 0.61), motivation to write (d = 1.42), and preferring word processing over writing by hand (d = 0.64). Especially powerful writing quality effects were associated with word processing programs that provided text quality feedback or prompted planning, drafting, or revising (d = 1.46), although this observation was based on a limited number of studies (n = 3).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-678
Number of pages38
JournalReading and Writing
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Word Processing
Meta-Analysis
writer
Research
Hand
remedies
Motivation
school grade
organization
planning

Keywords

  • Meta-analysis
  • Struggling writers
  • Word processing
  • Writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers : A meta-analysis of research findings. / Morphy, Paul; Graham, Stephen.

In: Reading and Writing, Vol. 25, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 641-678.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13c5738106714749a01da8bdcbec8d70,
title = "Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings",
abstract = "Since its advent word processing has become a common writing tool, providing potential advantages over writing by hand. Word processors permit easy revision, produce legible characters quickly, and may provide additional supports (e.g., spellcheckers, speech recognition). Such advantages should remedy common difficulties among weaker writers/readers in grades 1-12. Based on 27 studies with weaker writers, 20 of which were not considered in prior reviews, findings from this meta-analysis support this proposition. From 77 independent effects, the following average effects were greater than zero: writing quality (d = 0.52), length (d = 0.48), development/organization of text (d = 0.66), mechanical correctness (d = 0.61), motivation to write (d = 1.42), and preferring word processing over writing by hand (d = 0.64). Especially powerful writing quality effects were associated with word processing programs that provided text quality feedback or prompted planning, drafting, or revising (d = 1.46), although this observation was based on a limited number of studies (n = 3).",
keywords = "Meta-analysis, Struggling writers, Word processing, Writing",
author = "Paul Morphy and Stephen Graham",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "641--678",
journal = "Reading and Writing",
issn = "0922-4777",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers

T2 - A meta-analysis of research findings

AU - Morphy, Paul

AU - Graham, Stephen

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Since its advent word processing has become a common writing tool, providing potential advantages over writing by hand. Word processors permit easy revision, produce legible characters quickly, and may provide additional supports (e.g., spellcheckers, speech recognition). Such advantages should remedy common difficulties among weaker writers/readers in grades 1-12. Based on 27 studies with weaker writers, 20 of which were not considered in prior reviews, findings from this meta-analysis support this proposition. From 77 independent effects, the following average effects were greater than zero: writing quality (d = 0.52), length (d = 0.48), development/organization of text (d = 0.66), mechanical correctness (d = 0.61), motivation to write (d = 1.42), and preferring word processing over writing by hand (d = 0.64). Especially powerful writing quality effects were associated with word processing programs that provided text quality feedback or prompted planning, drafting, or revising (d = 1.46), although this observation was based on a limited number of studies (n = 3).

AB - Since its advent word processing has become a common writing tool, providing potential advantages over writing by hand. Word processors permit easy revision, produce legible characters quickly, and may provide additional supports (e.g., spellcheckers, speech recognition). Such advantages should remedy common difficulties among weaker writers/readers in grades 1-12. Based on 27 studies with weaker writers, 20 of which were not considered in prior reviews, findings from this meta-analysis support this proposition. From 77 independent effects, the following average effects were greater than zero: writing quality (d = 0.52), length (d = 0.48), development/organization of text (d = 0.66), mechanical correctness (d = 0.61), motivation to write (d = 1.42), and preferring word processing over writing by hand (d = 0.64). Especially powerful writing quality effects were associated with word processing programs that provided text quality feedback or prompted planning, drafting, or revising (d = 1.46), although this observation was based on a limited number of studies (n = 3).

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Struggling writers

KW - Word processing

KW - Writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857139745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857139745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5

DO - 10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84857139745

VL - 25

SP - 641

EP - 678

JO - Reading and Writing

JF - Reading and Writing

SN - 0922-4777

IS - 3

ER -