Women to the rescue: The gendered effects of public discontent on legislative nominations in Latin America

Kendall D. Funk, Magda Hinojosa, Jennifer M. Piscopo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Political parties act as gatekeepers, meaning that improvements in the representation of women depend on parties’ willingness to nominate women candidates. Previous research suggests that party characteristics and gender quotas largely explain women’s nominations, but overlooks the political context in which parties operate. This study highlights the gendered outcomes that occur when parties make nomination decisions in times of public discontent, namely increasing political distrust and increasing perceived corruption. We theorize that parties hold similar biases to voters: gender stereotypes that regard women as more trustworthy and honest should advantage women as political trust falls and perceptions of corruption rise. We hypothesize that parties nominate larger percentages of women in these circumstances. Using two waves of data from over 100 political parties in 18 Latin American countries, we find that parties nominate more women when a large proportion of the public distrusts the national legislature, providing support for the theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalParty Politics
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Latin America
political parties act
corruption
gatekeeper
gender
stereotype
candidacy
trend

Keywords

  • candidate nomination
  • candidate selection
  • gender stereotypes
  • political parties
  • women’s representation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{bb03b694be3b4faeb3cc2beb096aa7df,
title = "Women to the rescue: The gendered effects of public discontent on legislative nominations in Latin America",
abstract = "Political parties act as gatekeepers, meaning that improvements in the representation of women depend on parties’ willingness to nominate women candidates. Previous research suggests that party characteristics and gender quotas largely explain women’s nominations, but overlooks the political context in which parties operate. This study highlights the gendered outcomes that occur when parties make nomination decisions in times of public discontent, namely increasing political distrust and increasing perceived corruption. We theorize that parties hold similar biases to voters: gender stereotypes that regard women as more trustworthy and honest should advantage women as political trust falls and perceptions of corruption rise. We hypothesize that parties nominate larger percentages of women in these circumstances. Using two waves of data from over 100 political parties in 18 Latin American countries, we find that parties nominate more women when a large proportion of the public distrusts the national legislature, providing support for the theory.",
keywords = "candidate nomination, candidate selection, gender stereotypes, political parties, women’s representation",
author = "Funk, {Kendall D.} and Magda Hinojosa and Piscopo, {Jennifer M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1354068819856614",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Party Politics",
issn = "1354-0688",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women to the rescue

T2 - The gendered effects of public discontent on legislative nominations in Latin America

AU - Funk, Kendall D.

AU - Hinojosa, Magda

AU - Piscopo, Jennifer M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Political parties act as gatekeepers, meaning that improvements in the representation of women depend on parties’ willingness to nominate women candidates. Previous research suggests that party characteristics and gender quotas largely explain women’s nominations, but overlooks the political context in which parties operate. This study highlights the gendered outcomes that occur when parties make nomination decisions in times of public discontent, namely increasing political distrust and increasing perceived corruption. We theorize that parties hold similar biases to voters: gender stereotypes that regard women as more trustworthy and honest should advantage women as political trust falls and perceptions of corruption rise. We hypothesize that parties nominate larger percentages of women in these circumstances. Using two waves of data from over 100 political parties in 18 Latin American countries, we find that parties nominate more women when a large proportion of the public distrusts the national legislature, providing support for the theory.

AB - Political parties act as gatekeepers, meaning that improvements in the representation of women depend on parties’ willingness to nominate women candidates. Previous research suggests that party characteristics and gender quotas largely explain women’s nominations, but overlooks the political context in which parties operate. This study highlights the gendered outcomes that occur when parties make nomination decisions in times of public discontent, namely increasing political distrust and increasing perceived corruption. We theorize that parties hold similar biases to voters: gender stereotypes that regard women as more trustworthy and honest should advantage women as political trust falls and perceptions of corruption rise. We hypothesize that parties nominate larger percentages of women in these circumstances. Using two waves of data from over 100 political parties in 18 Latin American countries, we find that parties nominate more women when a large proportion of the public distrusts the national legislature, providing support for the theory.

KW - candidate nomination

KW - candidate selection

KW - gender stereotypes

KW - political parties

KW - women’s representation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068212304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068212304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1354068819856614

DO - 10.1177/1354068819856614

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068212304

JO - Party Politics

JF - Party Politics

SN - 1354-0688

ER -