Will They Listen to Me? An Examination of In-Group Gender Bias in Children’s Communication Beliefs

Sonya Xinyue Xiao, Rachel E. Cook, Carol Martin, Matthew G. Nielson, Ryan D. Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We assessed developmental and gender differences in children’s beliefs about their peers’ communication styles. We hypothesized that children hold more favorable beliefs (i.e., more responsiveness and less interruption) about communicating with same-gender peers than with other-gender peers. We also explored whether these beliefs related to children’s friendships and expectations that they will feel included or discomfort with their peers. Participants (n = 311) were 159 U.S. third-graders (Mage = 7.13, SD = .49, 52% girls) and 152 U.S. fifth-graders (Mage = 9.08, SD = .71, 46% girls). Children showed in-group biases: They expected more positive responses when communicating with same-gender versus other-gender peers. These patterns were stronger in girls and younger children. Beliefs about interruption varied by gender: girls expected girls to interrupt less than boys, and boys thought boys and girls interrupt equally often. Finally, the more children believed that they would receive positive communication responsiveness, the more friends, the more inclusion, and the less discomfort they expected with same- and other-gender peers. The more they expected interruptions, the less included and more discomfort they reported. The results suggest that children’s communication beliefs may perpetuate same-gender preferences; however, promoting mixed-gender interactions may help children cultivate beliefs and skills needed to function successfully in mixed-gender contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalSex Roles
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 28 2018

Fingerprint

Sexism
Communication
examination
communication
gender
trend
Group
friendship
gender-specific factors
inclusion

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Friendship
  • Gender
  • Homophily
  • In-group bias
  • Inclusion
  • Interruptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Will They Listen to Me? An Examination of In-Group Gender Bias in Children’s Communication Beliefs. / Xiao, Sonya Xinyue; Cook, Rachel E.; Martin, Carol; Nielson, Matthew G.; Field, Ryan D.

In: Sex Roles, 28.04.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Xiao, Sonya Xinyue ; Cook, Rachel E. ; Martin, Carol ; Nielson, Matthew G. ; Field, Ryan D. / Will They Listen to Me? An Examination of In-Group Gender Bias in Children’s Communication Beliefs. In: Sex Roles. 2018 ; pp. 1-14.
@article{db0ebdb5a6514f7480717ca1cb122880,
title = "Will They Listen to Me? An Examination of In-Group Gender Bias in Children’s Communication Beliefs",
abstract = "We assessed developmental and gender differences in children’s beliefs about their peers’ communication styles. We hypothesized that children hold more favorable beliefs (i.e., more responsiveness and less interruption) about communicating with same-gender peers than with other-gender peers. We also explored whether these beliefs related to children’s friendships and expectations that they will feel included or discomfort with their peers. Participants (n = 311) were 159 U.S. third-graders (Mage = 7.13, SD = .49, 52{\%} girls) and 152 U.S. fifth-graders (Mage = 9.08, SD = .71, 46{\%} girls). Children showed in-group biases: They expected more positive responses when communicating with same-gender versus other-gender peers. These patterns were stronger in girls and younger children. Beliefs about interruption varied by gender: girls expected girls to interrupt less than boys, and boys thought boys and girls interrupt equally often. Finally, the more children believed that they would receive positive communication responsiveness, the more friends, the more inclusion, and the less discomfort they expected with same- and other-gender peers. The more they expected interruptions, the less included and more discomfort they reported. The results suggest that children’s communication beliefs may perpetuate same-gender preferences; however, promoting mixed-gender interactions may help children cultivate beliefs and skills needed to function successfully in mixed-gender contexts.",
keywords = "Communication, Friendship, Gender, Homophily, In-group bias, Inclusion, Interruptions",
author = "Xiao, {Sonya Xinyue} and Cook, {Rachel E.} and Carol Martin and Nielson, {Matthew G.} and Field, {Ryan D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1007/s11199-018-0924-6",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Sex Roles: A Journal of Research",
issn = "0360-0025",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Will They Listen to Me? An Examination of In-Group Gender Bias in Children’s Communication Beliefs

AU - Xiao, Sonya Xinyue

AU - Cook, Rachel E.

AU - Martin, Carol

AU - Nielson, Matthew G.

AU - Field, Ryan D.

PY - 2018/4/28

Y1 - 2018/4/28

N2 - We assessed developmental and gender differences in children’s beliefs about their peers’ communication styles. We hypothesized that children hold more favorable beliefs (i.e., more responsiveness and less interruption) about communicating with same-gender peers than with other-gender peers. We also explored whether these beliefs related to children’s friendships and expectations that they will feel included or discomfort with their peers. Participants (n = 311) were 159 U.S. third-graders (Mage = 7.13, SD = .49, 52% girls) and 152 U.S. fifth-graders (Mage = 9.08, SD = .71, 46% girls). Children showed in-group biases: They expected more positive responses when communicating with same-gender versus other-gender peers. These patterns were stronger in girls and younger children. Beliefs about interruption varied by gender: girls expected girls to interrupt less than boys, and boys thought boys and girls interrupt equally often. Finally, the more children believed that they would receive positive communication responsiveness, the more friends, the more inclusion, and the less discomfort they expected with same- and other-gender peers. The more they expected interruptions, the less included and more discomfort they reported. The results suggest that children’s communication beliefs may perpetuate same-gender preferences; however, promoting mixed-gender interactions may help children cultivate beliefs and skills needed to function successfully in mixed-gender contexts.

AB - We assessed developmental and gender differences in children’s beliefs about their peers’ communication styles. We hypothesized that children hold more favorable beliefs (i.e., more responsiveness and less interruption) about communicating with same-gender peers than with other-gender peers. We also explored whether these beliefs related to children’s friendships and expectations that they will feel included or discomfort with their peers. Participants (n = 311) were 159 U.S. third-graders (Mage = 7.13, SD = .49, 52% girls) and 152 U.S. fifth-graders (Mage = 9.08, SD = .71, 46% girls). Children showed in-group biases: They expected more positive responses when communicating with same-gender versus other-gender peers. These patterns were stronger in girls and younger children. Beliefs about interruption varied by gender: girls expected girls to interrupt less than boys, and boys thought boys and girls interrupt equally often. Finally, the more children believed that they would receive positive communication responsiveness, the more friends, the more inclusion, and the less discomfort they expected with same- and other-gender peers. The more they expected interruptions, the less included and more discomfort they reported. The results suggest that children’s communication beliefs may perpetuate same-gender preferences; however, promoting mixed-gender interactions may help children cultivate beliefs and skills needed to function successfully in mixed-gender contexts.

KW - Communication

KW - Friendship

KW - Gender

KW - Homophily

KW - In-group bias

KW - Inclusion

KW - Interruptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046031025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046031025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11199-018-0924-6

DO - 10.1007/s11199-018-0924-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046031025

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

JF - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

SN - 0360-0025

ER -