Abstract

On-site, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 51 groups of campers in Mt. Jefferson Wilderness to understand their perception and evaluation of impacts to vegetation, soil, and trees. At campers' sites, measurements of vegetation loss, mineral soil exposure, tree damage, and site size were made for comparison with visitors' numeric evaluations of conditions. Content analysis of qualitative responses revealed that 75% of groups noticed vegetation impacts, 52% noticed soil impacts, and 51% noticed damage to trees. More than 70% of evaluative comments about conditions were positive, with many related to the functional benefits of impacts. Sites ranged in size from 13 m 2 to 453 m 2, but there were no statistically significant relationships between 6 measured impact parameters and campers' numeric evaluations of conditions. The difference between visitors' and managerial evaluations of impact conditions will present considerable challenges for selecting and successfully implementing management policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-250
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Leisure Research
Volume33
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

evaluation
vegetation
damage
soil
damages
Evaluation
Wilderness
content analysis
mineral
Group
interview
management
Vegetation
Soil
Damage
loss
exposure
analysis
comparison
policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Cite this

Wilderness campers' perception and evaluation of campsite impacts. / Farrell, Tracy; Hall, Troy E.; White, Dave.

In: Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2001, p. 229-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farrell, Tracy ; Hall, Troy E. ; White, Dave. / Wilderness campers' perception and evaluation of campsite impacts. In: Journal of Leisure Research. 2001 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 229-250.
@article{a0c420f46b7249899bcb33fa8749419d,
title = "Wilderness campers' perception and evaluation of campsite impacts",
abstract = "On-site, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 51 groups of campers in Mt. Jefferson Wilderness to understand their perception and evaluation of impacts to vegetation, soil, and trees. At campers' sites, measurements of vegetation loss, mineral soil exposure, tree damage, and site size were made for comparison with visitors' numeric evaluations of conditions. Content analysis of qualitative responses revealed that 75{\%} of groups noticed vegetation impacts, 52{\%} noticed soil impacts, and 51{\%} noticed damage to trees. More than 70{\%} of evaluative comments about conditions were positive, with many related to the functional benefits of impacts. Sites ranged in size from 13 m 2 to 453 m 2, but there were no statistically significant relationships between 6 measured impact parameters and campers' numeric evaluations of conditions. The difference between visitors' and managerial evaluations of impact conditions will present considerable challenges for selecting and successfully implementing management policies.",
author = "Tracy Farrell and Hall, {Troy E.} and Dave White",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "229--250",
journal = "Journal of Leisure Research",
issn = "0022-2216",
publisher = "National Recreation and Park Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wilderness campers' perception and evaluation of campsite impacts

AU - Farrell, Tracy

AU - Hall, Troy E.

AU - White, Dave

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - On-site, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 51 groups of campers in Mt. Jefferson Wilderness to understand their perception and evaluation of impacts to vegetation, soil, and trees. At campers' sites, measurements of vegetation loss, mineral soil exposure, tree damage, and site size were made for comparison with visitors' numeric evaluations of conditions. Content analysis of qualitative responses revealed that 75% of groups noticed vegetation impacts, 52% noticed soil impacts, and 51% noticed damage to trees. More than 70% of evaluative comments about conditions were positive, with many related to the functional benefits of impacts. Sites ranged in size from 13 m 2 to 453 m 2, but there were no statistically significant relationships between 6 measured impact parameters and campers' numeric evaluations of conditions. The difference between visitors' and managerial evaluations of impact conditions will present considerable challenges for selecting and successfully implementing management policies.

AB - On-site, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 51 groups of campers in Mt. Jefferson Wilderness to understand their perception and evaluation of impacts to vegetation, soil, and trees. At campers' sites, measurements of vegetation loss, mineral soil exposure, tree damage, and site size were made for comparison with visitors' numeric evaluations of conditions. Content analysis of qualitative responses revealed that 75% of groups noticed vegetation impacts, 52% noticed soil impacts, and 51% noticed damage to trees. More than 70% of evaluative comments about conditions were positive, with many related to the functional benefits of impacts. Sites ranged in size from 13 m 2 to 453 m 2, but there were no statistically significant relationships between 6 measured impact parameters and campers' numeric evaluations of conditions. The difference between visitors' and managerial evaluations of impact conditions will present considerable challenges for selecting and successfully implementing management policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1442337128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1442337128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1442337128

VL - 33

SP - 229

EP - 250

JO - Journal of Leisure Research

JF - Journal of Leisure Research

SN - 0022-2216

IS - 3

ER -