Why Students Learn More From Dialogue- Than Monologue-Videos

Analyses of Peer Interactions

Michelene Chi, Seokmin Kang, David L. Yaghmourian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2 separate studies, we found that college-age students learned more when they collaboratively watched tutorial dialogue-videos than lecture-style monologue-videos. In fact, they can learn as well as the tutees in the dialogue-videos. These results replicate similar findings in the literature showing the advantage of dialogue-videos even when observers watched them individually. However, having the observing students watch collaboratively as dyads provided data to carry out in-depth analyses of their conversations and activities in order to understand why dialogue-videos are superior to monologue-videos. Toward that goal, transcripts of video dialogues and monologues, as well as peer-to-peer conversations of the observing students collected in a prior study, were analyzed using the ICAP (interactive, constructive, active, passive) framework as a lens. Three sets of analyses were carried out. The 1st set focused on the content of the videos in terms of the tutors’ and the tutees’ moves. The 2nd set focused on the activities and behaviors of the collaboratively observing dyads. The 3rd set focused on the role of the tutees in the dialogue-videos in eliciting constructive and interactive engagement from the observing students. Our analyses suggest that dialogue-videos naturally elicited more constructive and interactive engagement behaviors from the observers than the monologue-videos, which in turn mediated the observers’ own learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-41
Number of pages41
JournalJournal of the Learning Sciences
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 13 2016

Fingerprint

video
dialogue
Students
interaction
student
Lenses
Learning
dyad
conversation
tutor
learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Why Students Learn More From Dialogue- Than Monologue-Videos : Analyses of Peer Interactions. / Chi, Michelene; Kang, Seokmin; Yaghmourian, David L.

In: Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13.08.2016, p. 1-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{551b36fbacb54aaa9ef4ecb6aa90df5c,
title = "Why Students Learn More From Dialogue- Than Monologue-Videos: Analyses of Peer Interactions",
abstract = "In 2 separate studies, we found that college-age students learned more when they collaboratively watched tutorial dialogue-videos than lecture-style monologue-videos. In fact, they can learn as well as the tutees in the dialogue-videos. These results replicate similar findings in the literature showing the advantage of dialogue-videos even when observers watched them individually. However, having the observing students watch collaboratively as dyads provided data to carry out in-depth analyses of their conversations and activities in order to understand why dialogue-videos are superior to monologue-videos. Toward that goal, transcripts of video dialogues and monologues, as well as peer-to-peer conversations of the observing students collected in a prior study, were analyzed using the ICAP (interactive, constructive, active, passive) framework as a lens. Three sets of analyses were carried out. The 1st set focused on the content of the videos in terms of the tutors’ and the tutees’ moves. The 2nd set focused on the activities and behaviors of the collaboratively observing dyads. The 3rd set focused on the role of the tutees in the dialogue-videos in eliciting constructive and interactive engagement from the observing students. Our analyses suggest that dialogue-videos naturally elicited more constructive and interactive engagement behaviors from the observers than the monologue-videos, which in turn mediated the observers’ own learning.",
author = "Michelene Chi and Seokmin Kang and Yaghmourian, {David L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1080/10508406.2016.1204546",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--41",
journal = "Journal of the Learning Sciences",
issn = "1050-8406",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Students Learn More From Dialogue- Than Monologue-Videos

T2 - Analyses of Peer Interactions

AU - Chi, Michelene

AU - Kang, Seokmin

AU - Yaghmourian, David L.

PY - 2016/8/13

Y1 - 2016/8/13

N2 - In 2 separate studies, we found that college-age students learned more when they collaboratively watched tutorial dialogue-videos than lecture-style monologue-videos. In fact, they can learn as well as the tutees in the dialogue-videos. These results replicate similar findings in the literature showing the advantage of dialogue-videos even when observers watched them individually. However, having the observing students watch collaboratively as dyads provided data to carry out in-depth analyses of their conversations and activities in order to understand why dialogue-videos are superior to monologue-videos. Toward that goal, transcripts of video dialogues and monologues, as well as peer-to-peer conversations of the observing students collected in a prior study, were analyzed using the ICAP (interactive, constructive, active, passive) framework as a lens. Three sets of analyses were carried out. The 1st set focused on the content of the videos in terms of the tutors’ and the tutees’ moves. The 2nd set focused on the activities and behaviors of the collaboratively observing dyads. The 3rd set focused on the role of the tutees in the dialogue-videos in eliciting constructive and interactive engagement from the observing students. Our analyses suggest that dialogue-videos naturally elicited more constructive and interactive engagement behaviors from the observers than the monologue-videos, which in turn mediated the observers’ own learning.

AB - In 2 separate studies, we found that college-age students learned more when they collaboratively watched tutorial dialogue-videos than lecture-style monologue-videos. In fact, they can learn as well as the tutees in the dialogue-videos. These results replicate similar findings in the literature showing the advantage of dialogue-videos even when observers watched them individually. However, having the observing students watch collaboratively as dyads provided data to carry out in-depth analyses of their conversations and activities in order to understand why dialogue-videos are superior to monologue-videos. Toward that goal, transcripts of video dialogues and monologues, as well as peer-to-peer conversations of the observing students collected in a prior study, were analyzed using the ICAP (interactive, constructive, active, passive) framework as a lens. Three sets of analyses were carried out. The 1st set focused on the content of the videos in terms of the tutors’ and the tutees’ moves. The 2nd set focused on the activities and behaviors of the collaboratively observing dyads. The 3rd set focused on the role of the tutees in the dialogue-videos in eliciting constructive and interactive engagement from the observing students. Our analyses suggest that dialogue-videos naturally elicited more constructive and interactive engagement behaviors from the observers than the monologue-videos, which in turn mediated the observers’ own learning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981554815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981554815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10508406.2016.1204546

DO - 10.1080/10508406.2016.1204546

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 41

JO - Journal of the Learning Sciences

JF - Journal of the Learning Sciences

SN - 1050-8406

ER -