Why service recovery fails: Tensions among customer, employee, and process perspectives

Stefan Michel, David Bowen, Robert Johnston

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    93 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose - The keys to effective service recovery are familiar to many throughout industry and academia. Nevertheless, overall customer satisfaction after a failure has not improved, and many managers claim their organizations cannot respond to and fix recurring problems quickly enough. Why does service recovery so often fail and what can managers do about it? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The objective is to produce an interdisciplinary summary of the growing literature on service recovery, bringing together what each of the author's domain - management, marketing, and human resources management - has to offer. By contrasting those three perspectives using 141 academic sources, nine tensions between customer, process, and employee recovery are discovered. Findings - It is argued that service recovery often fails due to the unresolved tensions found between the conflicting perspectives of customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Therefore, successful service recovery requires the integration of these different perspectives. This is summarized in the following definition: "Service recovery are the integrative actions a company takes to re-establish customer satisfaction and loyalty after a service failure (customer recovery), to ensure that failure incidents encourage learning and process improvement (process recovery) and to train and reward employees for this purpose (employee recovery)." Practical implications - Managers are not advised to directly address and solve the nine tensions between customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Instead, concentrating on the underlying cause of these tensions is recommended. That is, managers should strive to integrate service recovery efforts based upon a "service logic"; a balance of functional subcultures; strategy-driven resolution of functional differences; data-based decision making from the seamless collection and sharing of information; recovery metrics and rewards; and development of "T-shaped" employees with a service, not just functional, mindset. Originality/value - This paper provides an interdisciplinary view of the difficulties to implement a successful service recovery management. The contribution is twofold. First, specific tensions between customer, process and employee recovery are identified. Second, managers are offered recommendations of how to integrate the diverging perspectives.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)253-273
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Service Management
    Volume20
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Employees
    Service recovery
    services
    Managers
    human resource
    train
    marketing
    resource management
    learning
    decision making
    methodology
    industry
    Customer satisfaction
    Reward
    Mindset
    Process improvement
    Human resource management
    Subculture
    Design methodology
    Industry

    Keywords

    • Customer service management
    • Service failures

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Strategy and Management
    • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
    • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

    Cite this

    Why service recovery fails : Tensions among customer, employee, and process perspectives. / Michel, Stefan; Bowen, David; Johnston, Robert.

    In: Journal of Service Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2009, p. 253-273.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Michel, Stefan ; Bowen, David ; Johnston, Robert. / Why service recovery fails : Tensions among customer, employee, and process perspectives. In: Journal of Service Management. 2009 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 253-273.
    @article{532591d9bdee4d4dbd6b86dac2e3468e,
    title = "Why service recovery fails: Tensions among customer, employee, and process perspectives",
    abstract = "Purpose - The keys to effective service recovery are familiar to many throughout industry and academia. Nevertheless, overall customer satisfaction after a failure has not improved, and many managers claim their organizations cannot respond to and fix recurring problems quickly enough. Why does service recovery so often fail and what can managers do about it? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The objective is to produce an interdisciplinary summary of the growing literature on service recovery, bringing together what each of the author's domain - management, marketing, and human resources management - has to offer. By contrasting those three perspectives using 141 academic sources, nine tensions between customer, process, and employee recovery are discovered. Findings - It is argued that service recovery often fails due to the unresolved tensions found between the conflicting perspectives of customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Therefore, successful service recovery requires the integration of these different perspectives. This is summarized in the following definition: {"}Service recovery are the integrative actions a company takes to re-establish customer satisfaction and loyalty after a service failure (customer recovery), to ensure that failure incidents encourage learning and process improvement (process recovery) and to train and reward employees for this purpose (employee recovery).{"} Practical implications - Managers are not advised to directly address and solve the nine tensions between customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Instead, concentrating on the underlying cause of these tensions is recommended. That is, managers should strive to integrate service recovery efforts based upon a {"}service logic{"}; a balance of functional subcultures; strategy-driven resolution of functional differences; data-based decision making from the seamless collection and sharing of information; recovery metrics and rewards; and development of {"}T-shaped{"} employees with a service, not just functional, mindset. Originality/value - This paper provides an interdisciplinary view of the difficulties to implement a successful service recovery management. The contribution is twofold. First, specific tensions between customer, process and employee recovery are identified. Second, managers are offered recommendations of how to integrate the diverging perspectives.",
    keywords = "Customer service management, Service failures",
    author = "Stefan Michel and David Bowen and Robert Johnston",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1108/09564230910964381",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "253--273",
    journal = "Journal of Service Management",
    issn = "1757-5818",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Why service recovery fails

    T2 - Tensions among customer, employee, and process perspectives

    AU - Michel, Stefan

    AU - Bowen, David

    AU - Johnston, Robert

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - Purpose - The keys to effective service recovery are familiar to many throughout industry and academia. Nevertheless, overall customer satisfaction after a failure has not improved, and many managers claim their organizations cannot respond to and fix recurring problems quickly enough. Why does service recovery so often fail and what can managers do about it? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The objective is to produce an interdisciplinary summary of the growing literature on service recovery, bringing together what each of the author's domain - management, marketing, and human resources management - has to offer. By contrasting those three perspectives using 141 academic sources, nine tensions between customer, process, and employee recovery are discovered. Findings - It is argued that service recovery often fails due to the unresolved tensions found between the conflicting perspectives of customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Therefore, successful service recovery requires the integration of these different perspectives. This is summarized in the following definition: "Service recovery are the integrative actions a company takes to re-establish customer satisfaction and loyalty after a service failure (customer recovery), to ensure that failure incidents encourage learning and process improvement (process recovery) and to train and reward employees for this purpose (employee recovery)." Practical implications - Managers are not advised to directly address and solve the nine tensions between customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Instead, concentrating on the underlying cause of these tensions is recommended. That is, managers should strive to integrate service recovery efforts based upon a "service logic"; a balance of functional subcultures; strategy-driven resolution of functional differences; data-based decision making from the seamless collection and sharing of information; recovery metrics and rewards; and development of "T-shaped" employees with a service, not just functional, mindset. Originality/value - This paper provides an interdisciplinary view of the difficulties to implement a successful service recovery management. The contribution is twofold. First, specific tensions between customer, process and employee recovery are identified. Second, managers are offered recommendations of how to integrate the diverging perspectives.

    AB - Purpose - The keys to effective service recovery are familiar to many throughout industry and academia. Nevertheless, overall customer satisfaction after a failure has not improved, and many managers claim their organizations cannot respond to and fix recurring problems quickly enough. Why does service recovery so often fail and what can managers do about it? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The objective is to produce an interdisciplinary summary of the growing literature on service recovery, bringing together what each of the author's domain - management, marketing, and human resources management - has to offer. By contrasting those three perspectives using 141 academic sources, nine tensions between customer, process, and employee recovery are discovered. Findings - It is argued that service recovery often fails due to the unresolved tensions found between the conflicting perspectives of customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Therefore, successful service recovery requires the integration of these different perspectives. This is summarized in the following definition: "Service recovery are the integrative actions a company takes to re-establish customer satisfaction and loyalty after a service failure (customer recovery), to ensure that failure incidents encourage learning and process improvement (process recovery) and to train and reward employees for this purpose (employee recovery)." Practical implications - Managers are not advised to directly address and solve the nine tensions between customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Instead, concentrating on the underlying cause of these tensions is recommended. That is, managers should strive to integrate service recovery efforts based upon a "service logic"; a balance of functional subcultures; strategy-driven resolution of functional differences; data-based decision making from the seamless collection and sharing of information; recovery metrics and rewards; and development of "T-shaped" employees with a service, not just functional, mindset. Originality/value - This paper provides an interdisciplinary view of the difficulties to implement a successful service recovery management. The contribution is twofold. First, specific tensions between customer, process and employee recovery are identified. Second, managers are offered recommendations of how to integrate the diverging perspectives.

    KW - Customer service management

    KW - Service failures

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75149196248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75149196248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/09564230910964381

    DO - 10.1108/09564230910964381

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:75149196248

    VL - 20

    SP - 253

    EP - 273

    JO - Journal of Service Management

    JF - Journal of Service Management

    SN - 1757-5818

    IS - 3

    ER -