Why Kass and Callahan are wrong (but maybe a little right).

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-88
Number of pages24
JournalMonash bioethics review
Volume30
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Personhood
Attitude to Health
Mass Media
Monozygotic Twins
Individuality
Organism Cloning
Genotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Why Kass and Callahan are wrong (but maybe a little right). / Manninen, Bertha.

In: Monash bioethics review, Vol. 30, No. 1, 03.2012, p. 65-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba856bc3ce814d28b3dec5c3553e3687,
title = "Why Kass and Callahan are wrong (but maybe a little right).",
author = "Bertha Manninen",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "65--88",
journal = "Monash bioethics review",
issn = "1321-2753",
publisher = "Monash University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Kass and Callahan are wrong (but maybe a little right).

AU - Manninen, Bertha

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866449144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866449144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22924243

AN - SCOPUS:84866449144

VL - 30

SP - 65

EP - 88

JO - Monash bioethics review

JF - Monash bioethics review

SN - 1321-2753

IS - 1

ER -