Why it's unjust to expect location-specific, language-specific, or population-specific service from students with underrepresented minority or low-income backgrounds

Barret Michalec, Maria Athina Martimianakis, Jon C. Tilburt, Frederic W. Hafferty

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this case we meet Amanda, a medical student of Native and Latin American ethnicity who receives financial aid. Her friends are surprised by her interest in an elite residency program. They suggest, rather, that with her language skills, ethnic background, and interest in social justice, she has a responsibility to work with underserved patient populations. In our commentary, we consider issues raised by the case and explore Amanda's friends' underlying expectations and assumptions that perpetuate the very inequities that the resolution of the case purports to address. We also identify the role of privilege and address the “burden of expectation” that appears to be associated with underrepresented minority (URM) medical students and normative assumptions about their career paths.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)238-244
Number of pages7
JournalAMA Journal of Ethics
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why it's unjust to expect location-specific, language-specific, or population-specific service from students with underrepresented minority or low-income backgrounds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this