Why is working memory capacity related to matrix reasoning tasks?

Tyler L. Harrison, Zach Shipstead, Randall W. Engle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the reasons why working memory capacity is so widely researched is its substantial relationship with fluid intelligence. Although this relationship has been found in numerous studies, researchers have been unable to provide a conclusive answer as to why the two constructs are related. In a recent study, researchers examined which attributes of Raven’s Progressive Matrices were most strongly linked with working memory capacity (Wiley, Jarosz, Cushen, & Colflesh, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 256–263, 2011). In that study, Raven’s problems that required a novel combination of rules to solve were more strongly correlated with working memory capacity than were problems that did not. In the present study, we wanted to conceptually replicate the Wiley et al. results while controlling for a few potential confounds. Thus, we experimentally manipulated whether a problem required a novel combination of rules and found that repeated-rule-combination problems were more strongly related to working memory capacity than were novel-rule-combination problems. The relationship to other measures of fluid intelligence did not change based on whether the problem required a novel rule combination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-396
Number of pages8
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Crows
Intelligence
Research Personnel
Experimental Psychology
Cognition
Learning
Working Memory Capacity

Keywords

  • Intelligence
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Why is working memory capacity related to matrix reasoning tasks? / Harrison, Tyler L.; Shipstead, Zach; Engle, Randall W.

In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.04.2015, p. 389-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harrison, Tyler L. ; Shipstead, Zach ; Engle, Randall W. / Why is working memory capacity related to matrix reasoning tasks?. In: Memory and Cognition. 2015 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 389-396.
@article{a34115ff31af44759455d75df8f52ed9,
title = "Why is working memory capacity related to matrix reasoning tasks?",
abstract = "One of the reasons why working memory capacity is so widely researched is its substantial relationship with fluid intelligence. Although this relationship has been found in numerous studies, researchers have been unable to provide a conclusive answer as to why the two constructs are related. In a recent study, researchers examined which attributes of Raven’s Progressive Matrices were most strongly linked with working memory capacity (Wiley, Jarosz, Cushen, & Colflesh, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 256–263, 2011). In that study, Raven’s problems that required a novel combination of rules to solve were more strongly correlated with working memory capacity than were problems that did not. In the present study, we wanted to conceptually replicate the Wiley et al. results while controlling for a few potential confounds. Thus, we experimentally manipulated whether a problem required a novel combination of rules and found that repeated-rule-combination problems were more strongly related to working memory capacity than were novel-rule-combination problems. The relationship to other measures of fluid intelligence did not change based on whether the problem required a novel rule combination.",
keywords = "Intelligence, Working memory",
author = "Harrison, {Tyler L.} and Zach Shipstead and Engle, {Randall W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13421-014-0473-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "389--396",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why is working memory capacity related to matrix reasoning tasks?

AU - Harrison, Tyler L.

AU - Shipstead, Zach

AU - Engle, Randall W.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - One of the reasons why working memory capacity is so widely researched is its substantial relationship with fluid intelligence. Although this relationship has been found in numerous studies, researchers have been unable to provide a conclusive answer as to why the two constructs are related. In a recent study, researchers examined which attributes of Raven’s Progressive Matrices were most strongly linked with working memory capacity (Wiley, Jarosz, Cushen, & Colflesh, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 256–263, 2011). In that study, Raven’s problems that required a novel combination of rules to solve were more strongly correlated with working memory capacity than were problems that did not. In the present study, we wanted to conceptually replicate the Wiley et al. results while controlling for a few potential confounds. Thus, we experimentally manipulated whether a problem required a novel combination of rules and found that repeated-rule-combination problems were more strongly related to working memory capacity than were novel-rule-combination problems. The relationship to other measures of fluid intelligence did not change based on whether the problem required a novel rule combination.

AB - One of the reasons why working memory capacity is so widely researched is its substantial relationship with fluid intelligence. Although this relationship has been found in numerous studies, researchers have been unable to provide a conclusive answer as to why the two constructs are related. In a recent study, researchers examined which attributes of Raven’s Progressive Matrices were most strongly linked with working memory capacity (Wiley, Jarosz, Cushen, & Colflesh, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 256–263, 2011). In that study, Raven’s problems that required a novel combination of rules to solve were more strongly correlated with working memory capacity than were problems that did not. In the present study, we wanted to conceptually replicate the Wiley et al. results while controlling for a few potential confounds. Thus, we experimentally manipulated whether a problem required a novel combination of rules and found that repeated-rule-combination problems were more strongly related to working memory capacity than were novel-rule-combination problems. The relationship to other measures of fluid intelligence did not change based on whether the problem required a novel rule combination.

KW - Intelligence

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939975717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939975717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13421-014-0473-3

DO - 10.3758/s13421-014-0473-3

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 389

EP - 396

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 3

ER -