Why do firms use private equity to opt out of public markets?

Sreedhar Bharath, Amy K. Dittmar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate how firms weigh the costs and benefits of being public in the decision to opt out of the public market and go private. We draw on previous studies of going private and on the subsequent well-developed theoretical literature on why firms go public to develop our hypotheses. We employ a comprehensive sample of going-private transactions from 1980 to 2004 in the United States and examine how these firms differ over their public life (from IPO to going private) relative to a sample of firms that went and remained public. Our results provide strong support for the importance of information and liquidity considerations in being a public firm. These factors are evident at the IPO, on average thirteen years before the going-private decision. Access to capital and control considerations become increasingly important in the choice of going private over the public life of the firm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1771-1818
Number of pages48
JournalReview of Financial Studies
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Going private
Private equity
Factors
Costs and benefits
Public firm
Liquidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Accounting
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Why do firms use private equity to opt out of public markets? / Bharath, Sreedhar; Dittmar, Amy K.

In: Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 23, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 1771-1818.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb24c3d01b654be5b4ca5cbebb057f5c,
title = "Why do firms use private equity to opt out of public markets?",
abstract = "We investigate how firms weigh the costs and benefits of being public in the decision to opt out of the public market and go private. We draw on previous studies of going private and on the subsequent well-developed theoretical literature on why firms go public to develop our hypotheses. We employ a comprehensive sample of going-private transactions from 1980 to 2004 in the United States and examine how these firms differ over their public life (from IPO to going private) relative to a sample of firms that went and remained public. Our results provide strong support for the importance of information and liquidity considerations in being a public firm. These factors are evident at the IPO, on average thirteen years before the going-private decision. Access to capital and control considerations become increasingly important in the choice of going private over the public life of the firm.",
author = "Sreedhar Bharath and Dittmar, {Amy K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1093/rfs/hhq016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "1771--1818",
journal = "Review of Financial Studies",
issn = "0893-9454",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do firms use private equity to opt out of public markets?

AU - Bharath, Sreedhar

AU - Dittmar, Amy K.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - We investigate how firms weigh the costs and benefits of being public in the decision to opt out of the public market and go private. We draw on previous studies of going private and on the subsequent well-developed theoretical literature on why firms go public to develop our hypotheses. We employ a comprehensive sample of going-private transactions from 1980 to 2004 in the United States and examine how these firms differ over their public life (from IPO to going private) relative to a sample of firms that went and remained public. Our results provide strong support for the importance of information and liquidity considerations in being a public firm. These factors are evident at the IPO, on average thirteen years before the going-private decision. Access to capital and control considerations become increasingly important in the choice of going private over the public life of the firm.

AB - We investigate how firms weigh the costs and benefits of being public in the decision to opt out of the public market and go private. We draw on previous studies of going private and on the subsequent well-developed theoretical literature on why firms go public to develop our hypotheses. We employ a comprehensive sample of going-private transactions from 1980 to 2004 in the United States and examine how these firms differ over their public life (from IPO to going private) relative to a sample of firms that went and remained public. Our results provide strong support for the importance of information and liquidity considerations in being a public firm. These factors are evident at the IPO, on average thirteen years before the going-private decision. Access to capital and control considerations become increasingly important in the choice of going private over the public life of the firm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951237589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951237589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rfs/hhq016

DO - 10.1093/rfs/hhq016

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77951237589

VL - 23

SP - 1771

EP - 1818

JO - Review of Financial Studies

JF - Review of Financial Studies

SN - 0893-9454

IS - 5

ER -