Who Really Bowls Alone? Cities, Suburbs, and Social Time in the United States

Eric A. Morris, Deirdre Pfeiffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One potential consequence of suburbanization is weaker social connectedness. Based on data from the 2003 to 2013 American Time Use Surveys, this research uses difference of means t-tests, propensity score matching, and Tobit regression to assess whether suburban living is associated with less socializing than city living in mid-to-large American metropolitan areas. After controlling for personal characteristics, we find no meaningful difference in suburbanites’ and city dwellers’ time spent socializing across a wide range of social activities. Further, suburbanites and city dwellers spend a very similar amount of time traveling, and more time spent traveling is associated with more socializing, not less.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-222
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Planning Education and Research
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

suburb
suburbanization
survey research
metropolitan area
agglomeration area
regression
time
city

Keywords

  • social capital
  • social time
  • sprawl
  • suburbs
  • time use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Who Really Bowls Alone? Cities, Suburbs, and Social Time in the United States. / Morris, Eric A.; Pfeiffer, Deirdre.

In: Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2017, p. 207-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ccc8626298b44ea2a2ae4639b72e0dc8,
title = "Who Really Bowls Alone? Cities, Suburbs, and Social Time in the United States",
abstract = "One potential consequence of suburbanization is weaker social connectedness. Based on data from the 2003 to 2013 American Time Use Surveys, this research uses difference of means t-tests, propensity score matching, and Tobit regression to assess whether suburban living is associated with less socializing than city living in mid-to-large American metropolitan areas. After controlling for personal characteristics, we find no meaningful difference in suburbanites’ and city dwellers’ time spent socializing across a wide range of social activities. Further, suburbanites and city dwellers spend a very similar amount of time traveling, and more time spent traveling is associated with more socializing, not less.",
keywords = "social capital, social time, sprawl, suburbs, time use",
author = "Morris, {Eric A.} and Deirdre Pfeiffer",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0739456X16647160",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "207--222",
journal = "Journal of Planning Education and Research",
issn = "0739-456X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Really Bowls Alone? Cities, Suburbs, and Social Time in the United States

AU - Morris, Eric A.

AU - Pfeiffer, Deirdre

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - One potential consequence of suburbanization is weaker social connectedness. Based on data from the 2003 to 2013 American Time Use Surveys, this research uses difference of means t-tests, propensity score matching, and Tobit regression to assess whether suburban living is associated with less socializing than city living in mid-to-large American metropolitan areas. After controlling for personal characteristics, we find no meaningful difference in suburbanites’ and city dwellers’ time spent socializing across a wide range of social activities. Further, suburbanites and city dwellers spend a very similar amount of time traveling, and more time spent traveling is associated with more socializing, not less.

AB - One potential consequence of suburbanization is weaker social connectedness. Based on data from the 2003 to 2013 American Time Use Surveys, this research uses difference of means t-tests, propensity score matching, and Tobit regression to assess whether suburban living is associated with less socializing than city living in mid-to-large American metropolitan areas. After controlling for personal characteristics, we find no meaningful difference in suburbanites’ and city dwellers’ time spent socializing across a wide range of social activities. Further, suburbanites and city dwellers spend a very similar amount of time traveling, and more time spent traveling is associated with more socializing, not less.

KW - social capital

KW - social time

KW - sprawl

KW - suburbs

KW - time use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018789795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018789795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0739456X16647160

DO - 10.1177/0739456X16647160

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018789795

VL - 37

SP - 207

EP - 222

JO - Journal of Planning Education and Research

JF - Journal of Planning Education and Research

SN - 0739-456X

IS - 2

ER -