Abstract

When anger or happiness flashes on a face in the crowd, do we misperceive that emotion as belonging to someone else? Two studies found that misperception of apparent emotional expressions-"illusory conjunctions"-depended on the gender of the target: male faces tended to "grab" anger from neighboring faces, and female faces tended to grab happiness. Importantly, the evidence did not suggest that this effect was due to the general tendency to misperceive male or female faces as angry or happy, but instead indicated a more subtle interaction of expectations and early visual processes. This suggests a novel aspect of affordance-management in human perception, whereby cues to threat, when they appear, are attributed to those with the greatest capability of doing harm, whereas cues to friendship are attributed to those with the greatest likelihood of providing affiliation opportunities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)583-586
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Expressed Emotion
Happiness
Anger
happiness
anger
emotion
friendship
Cues
threat
gender
interaction
management
evidence
Emotions

Keywords

  • Affordance management
  • Anger expression
  • Face perception
  • Gender differences
  • Happiness expression
  • Threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Who expressed what emotion? Men grab anger, women grab happiness. / Neel, Rebecca; Becker, David; Neuberg, Steven; Kenrick, Douglas.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 03.2012, p. 583-586.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae87902125b642d4ad7bb7188c7af4ba,
title = "Who expressed what emotion? Men grab anger, women grab happiness",
abstract = "When anger or happiness flashes on a face in the crowd, do we misperceive that emotion as belonging to someone else? Two studies found that misperception of apparent emotional expressions-{"}illusory conjunctions{"}-depended on the gender of the target: male faces tended to {"}grab{"} anger from neighboring faces, and female faces tended to grab happiness. Importantly, the evidence did not suggest that this effect was due to the general tendency to misperceive male or female faces as angry or happy, but instead indicated a more subtle interaction of expectations and early visual processes. This suggests a novel aspect of affordance-management in human perception, whereby cues to threat, when they appear, are attributed to those with the greatest capability of doing harm, whereas cues to friendship are attributed to those with the greatest likelihood of providing affiliation opportunities.",
keywords = "Affordance management, Anger expression, Face perception, Gender differences, Happiness expression, Threat",
author = "Rebecca Neel and David Becker and Steven Neuberg and Douglas Kenrick",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "583--586",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who expressed what emotion? Men grab anger, women grab happiness

AU - Neel, Rebecca

AU - Becker, David

AU - Neuberg, Steven

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - When anger or happiness flashes on a face in the crowd, do we misperceive that emotion as belonging to someone else? Two studies found that misperception of apparent emotional expressions-"illusory conjunctions"-depended on the gender of the target: male faces tended to "grab" anger from neighboring faces, and female faces tended to grab happiness. Importantly, the evidence did not suggest that this effect was due to the general tendency to misperceive male or female faces as angry or happy, but instead indicated a more subtle interaction of expectations and early visual processes. This suggests a novel aspect of affordance-management in human perception, whereby cues to threat, when they appear, are attributed to those with the greatest capability of doing harm, whereas cues to friendship are attributed to those with the greatest likelihood of providing affiliation opportunities.

AB - When anger or happiness flashes on a face in the crowd, do we misperceive that emotion as belonging to someone else? Two studies found that misperception of apparent emotional expressions-"illusory conjunctions"-depended on the gender of the target: male faces tended to "grab" anger from neighboring faces, and female faces tended to grab happiness. Importantly, the evidence did not suggest that this effect was due to the general tendency to misperceive male or female faces as angry or happy, but instead indicated a more subtle interaction of expectations and early visual processes. This suggests a novel aspect of affordance-management in human perception, whereby cues to threat, when they appear, are attributed to those with the greatest capability of doing harm, whereas cues to friendship are attributed to those with the greatest likelihood of providing affiliation opportunities.

KW - Affordance management

KW - Anger expression

KW - Face perception

KW - Gender differences

KW - Happiness expression

KW - Threat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857140401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857140401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.009

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 583

EP - 586

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 2

ER -