White university students' racial affect: Understanding the antiracist type

Kathleen S. Kordesh, Lisa Spanierman, Helen A. Neville

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior quantitative research using the Psychosocial Costs of Racism to Whites scale (PCRW; Spanierman & Heppner, 2004) identified five racial affect types among White undergraduate students. To better understand the Antiracist type, the most racially aware and sensitive among the five types, the authors of the present study conducted two focus groups. One group comprised White students (n = 5) whose scores reflected the Antiracist racial affect type, whereas the other comprised White students (n = 6) who did not score as Antiracist. Using a modified version of the consensual qualitative research method (Hill et al., 2005; Hill, Thompson, & Williams, 1997), analysis revealed six topic domains: (a) manifestations of racial awareness, (b) experiences with diversity while growing up, (c) experiences with diversity at the university, (d) emotional responses to racial issues, (e) perceptions of the racialized mascot of the university, and (f) expressions of racism. Providing additional validation for the PCRW, findings indicated that White students in the Antiracist group differed in important ways on each of the six domains from those in the non-antiracist group. Moreover, the students classified in the Antiracist affect type demonstrated a number of similarities to how White antiracist activists have been described in the broader interdisciplinary literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-50
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Diversity in Higher Education
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

university
student
racism
Group
quantitative research
qualitative method
research method
qualitative research
experience
costs
literature

Keywords

  • antiracism
  • Psychosocial Costs of Racism to Whites scale
  • White racial attitudes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

White university students' racial affect : Understanding the antiracist type. / Kordesh, Kathleen S.; Spanierman, Lisa; Neville, Helen A.

In: Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, Vol. 6, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 33-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{985a682abc884ebcb62c3d1c30f37f03,
title = "White university students' racial affect: Understanding the antiracist type",
abstract = "Prior quantitative research using the Psychosocial Costs of Racism to Whites scale (PCRW; Spanierman & Heppner, 2004) identified five racial affect types among White undergraduate students. To better understand the Antiracist type, the most racially aware and sensitive among the five types, the authors of the present study conducted two focus groups. One group comprised White students (n = 5) whose scores reflected the Antiracist racial affect type, whereas the other comprised White students (n = 6) who did not score as Antiracist. Using a modified version of the consensual qualitative research method (Hill et al., 2005; Hill, Thompson, & Williams, 1997), analysis revealed six topic domains: (a) manifestations of racial awareness, (b) experiences with diversity while growing up, (c) experiences with diversity at the university, (d) emotional responses to racial issues, (e) perceptions of the racialized mascot of the university, and (f) expressions of racism. Providing additional validation for the PCRW, findings indicated that White students in the Antiracist group differed in important ways on each of the six domains from those in the non-antiracist group. Moreover, the students classified in the Antiracist affect type demonstrated a number of similarities to how White antiracist activists have been described in the broader interdisciplinary literature.",
keywords = "antiracism, Psychosocial Costs of Racism to Whites scale, White racial attitudes",
author = "Kordesh, {Kathleen S.} and Lisa Spanierman and Neville, {Helen A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/a0030102",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "33--50",
journal = "Journal of Diversity in Higher Education",
issn = "1938-8926",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - White university students' racial affect

T2 - Understanding the antiracist type

AU - Kordesh, Kathleen S.

AU - Spanierman, Lisa

AU - Neville, Helen A.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Prior quantitative research using the Psychosocial Costs of Racism to Whites scale (PCRW; Spanierman & Heppner, 2004) identified five racial affect types among White undergraduate students. To better understand the Antiracist type, the most racially aware and sensitive among the five types, the authors of the present study conducted two focus groups. One group comprised White students (n = 5) whose scores reflected the Antiracist racial affect type, whereas the other comprised White students (n = 6) who did not score as Antiracist. Using a modified version of the consensual qualitative research method (Hill et al., 2005; Hill, Thompson, & Williams, 1997), analysis revealed six topic domains: (a) manifestations of racial awareness, (b) experiences with diversity while growing up, (c) experiences with diversity at the university, (d) emotional responses to racial issues, (e) perceptions of the racialized mascot of the university, and (f) expressions of racism. Providing additional validation for the PCRW, findings indicated that White students in the Antiracist group differed in important ways on each of the six domains from those in the non-antiracist group. Moreover, the students classified in the Antiracist affect type demonstrated a number of similarities to how White antiracist activists have been described in the broader interdisciplinary literature.

AB - Prior quantitative research using the Psychosocial Costs of Racism to Whites scale (PCRW; Spanierman & Heppner, 2004) identified five racial affect types among White undergraduate students. To better understand the Antiracist type, the most racially aware and sensitive among the five types, the authors of the present study conducted two focus groups. One group comprised White students (n = 5) whose scores reflected the Antiracist racial affect type, whereas the other comprised White students (n = 6) who did not score as Antiracist. Using a modified version of the consensual qualitative research method (Hill et al., 2005; Hill, Thompson, & Williams, 1997), analysis revealed six topic domains: (a) manifestations of racial awareness, (b) experiences with diversity while growing up, (c) experiences with diversity at the university, (d) emotional responses to racial issues, (e) perceptions of the racialized mascot of the university, and (f) expressions of racism. Providing additional validation for the PCRW, findings indicated that White students in the Antiracist group differed in important ways on each of the six domains from those in the non-antiracist group. Moreover, the students classified in the Antiracist affect type demonstrated a number of similarities to how White antiracist activists have been described in the broader interdisciplinary literature.

KW - antiracism

KW - Psychosocial Costs of Racism to Whites scale

KW - White racial attitudes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875398053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875398053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0030102

DO - 10.1037/a0030102

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875398053

VL - 6

SP - 33

EP - 50

JO - Journal of Diversity in Higher Education

JF - Journal of Diversity in Higher Education

SN - 1938-8926

IS - 1

ER -