White Arctic vs. Blue Arctic: A case study of diverging stakeholder responses to environmental change

Robert Newton, Stephanie Pfirman, Peter Schlosser, Bruno Tremblay, Maribeth Murray, Rafe Pomerance

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent trends and climate models suggest that the Arctic summer sea ice cover is likely to be lost before climate interventions can stabilize it. There are environmental, socioeconomic, and sociocultural arguments for, but also against, restoring and sustaining current conditions. Even if global warming can be reversed, some people will experience ice-free summers before perennial sea ice begins to return. We ask: How will future generations feel about bringing sea ice back where they have not experienced it before? How will conflicted interests in ice-covered vs. ice-free conditions be resolved? What role will science play in these debates?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)396-405
Number of pages10
JournalEarth's Future
Volume4
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Arctic climate change
  • Arctic climate stakeholders
  • Carbon capture and sequestration
  • Climate science policy
  • Ice free Arctic summers
  • Stakeholder conflicts and climate change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'White Arctic vs. Blue Arctic: A case study of diverging stakeholder responses to environmental change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this