White Arctic vs. Blue Arctic

A case study of diverging stakeholder responses to environmental change

Robert Newton, Stephanie Pfirman, Peter Schlosser, Bruno Tremblay, Maribeth Murray, Rafe Pomerance

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent trends and climate models suggest that the Arctic summer sea ice cover is likely to be lost before climate interventions can stabilize it. There are environmental, socioeconomic, and sociocultural arguments for, but also against, restoring and sustaining current conditions. Even if global warming can be reversed, some people will experience ice-free summers before perennial sea ice begins to return. We ask: How will future generations feel about bringing sea ice back where they have not experienced it before? How will conflicted interests in ice-covered vs. ice-free conditions be resolved? What role will science play in these debates?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)396-405
Number of pages10
JournalEarth's Future
Volume4
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sea ice
environmental change
stakeholder
ice
summer
ice cover
global warming
climate modeling
climate
trend
socioeconomics
science

Keywords

  • Arctic climate change
  • Arctic climate stakeholders
  • Carbon capture and sequestration
  • Climate science policy
  • Ice free Arctic summers
  • Stakeholder conflicts and climate change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

White Arctic vs. Blue Arctic : A case study of diverging stakeholder responses to environmental change. / Newton, Robert; Pfirman, Stephanie; Schlosser, Peter; Tremblay, Bruno; Murray, Maribeth; Pomerance, Rafe.

In: Earth's Future, Vol. 4, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 396-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Newton, Robert ; Pfirman, Stephanie ; Schlosser, Peter ; Tremblay, Bruno ; Murray, Maribeth ; Pomerance, Rafe. / White Arctic vs. Blue Arctic : A case study of diverging stakeholder responses to environmental change. In: Earth's Future. 2016 ; Vol. 4, No. 8. pp. 396-405.
@article{4b288a473d8c4394ae260c935a8a8708,
title = "White Arctic vs. Blue Arctic: A case study of diverging stakeholder responses to environmental change",
abstract = "Recent trends and climate models suggest that the Arctic summer sea ice cover is likely to be lost before climate interventions can stabilize it. There are environmental, socioeconomic, and sociocultural arguments for, but also against, restoring and sustaining current conditions. Even if global warming can be reversed, some people will experience ice-free summers before perennial sea ice begins to return. We ask: How will future generations feel about bringing sea ice back where they have not experienced it before? How will conflicted interests in ice-covered vs. ice-free conditions be resolved? What role will science play in these debates?.",
keywords = "Arctic climate change, Arctic climate stakeholders, Carbon capture and sequestration, Climate science policy, Ice free Arctic summers, Stakeholder conflicts and climate change",
author = "Robert Newton and Stephanie Pfirman and Peter Schlosser and Bruno Tremblay and Maribeth Murray and Rafe Pomerance",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/2016EF000356",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "396--405",
journal = "Earth's Future",
issn = "2328-4277",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - White Arctic vs. Blue Arctic

T2 - A case study of diverging stakeholder responses to environmental change

AU - Newton, Robert

AU - Pfirman, Stephanie

AU - Schlosser, Peter

AU - Tremblay, Bruno

AU - Murray, Maribeth

AU - Pomerance, Rafe

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Recent trends and climate models suggest that the Arctic summer sea ice cover is likely to be lost before climate interventions can stabilize it. There are environmental, socioeconomic, and sociocultural arguments for, but also against, restoring and sustaining current conditions. Even if global warming can be reversed, some people will experience ice-free summers before perennial sea ice begins to return. We ask: How will future generations feel about bringing sea ice back where they have not experienced it before? How will conflicted interests in ice-covered vs. ice-free conditions be resolved? What role will science play in these debates?.

AB - Recent trends and climate models suggest that the Arctic summer sea ice cover is likely to be lost before climate interventions can stabilize it. There are environmental, socioeconomic, and sociocultural arguments for, but also against, restoring and sustaining current conditions. Even if global warming can be reversed, some people will experience ice-free summers before perennial sea ice begins to return. We ask: How will future generations feel about bringing sea ice back where they have not experienced it before? How will conflicted interests in ice-covered vs. ice-free conditions be resolved? What role will science play in these debates?.

KW - Arctic climate change

KW - Arctic climate stakeholders

KW - Carbon capture and sequestration

KW - Climate science policy

KW - Ice free Arctic summers

KW - Stakeholder conflicts and climate change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987850967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987850967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2016EF000356

DO - 10.1002/2016EF000356

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 4

SP - 396

EP - 405

JO - Earth's Future

JF - Earth's Future

SN - 2328-4277

IS - 8

ER -