Which Deceptive Practices, If Any, Should Be Allowed in Experimental Economics Research? Results from Surveys of Applied Experimental Economists and Students

Gregory Colson, Jay R. Corrigan, Carola Grebitus, Maria L. Loureiro, Matthew C. Rousu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Deceptive experimental practices are banned in some professions but are standard in others. Recently, the journals of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association introduced guidelines that allow researchers to publish articles that use some forms of deception. However, in their present form, these guidelines leave room for interpretation. This situation is not ideal for researchers, and a clearer definition of which deceptive practices should be banned could be beneficial. Our aim is to help provide greater clarity and potential guidance for journal policies regarding deception by using the results of surveys of both researcher and student subjects. Evaluating ten potentially deceptive experimental techniques, we find consistent support for banning certain practices while allowing others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-621
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume98
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

economists
students
researchers
Economics
Research Personnel
Deception
Students
economics
Research
Guidelines
Surveys and Questionnaires
Experimental economics
Economists
Economic research
methodology

Keywords

  • Deception
  • economic experiments
  • ethics
  • experimental auctions
  • institutional review boards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Which Deceptive Practices, If Any, Should Be Allowed in Experimental Economics Research? Results from Surveys of Applied Experimental Economists and Students. / Colson, Gregory; Corrigan, Jay R.; Grebitus, Carola; Loureiro, Maria L.; Rousu, Matthew C.

In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 98, No. 2, 01.03.2016, p. 610-621.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d892627fbeed47f9be7139634dbae7fc,
title = "Which Deceptive Practices, If Any, Should Be Allowed in Experimental Economics Research? Results from Surveys of Applied Experimental Economists and Students",
abstract = "Deceptive experimental practices are banned in some professions but are standard in others. Recently, the journals of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association introduced guidelines that allow researchers to publish articles that use some forms of deception. However, in their present form, these guidelines leave room for interpretation. This situation is not ideal for researchers, and a clearer definition of which deceptive practices should be banned could be beneficial. Our aim is to help provide greater clarity and potential guidance for journal policies regarding deception by using the results of surveys of both researcher and student subjects. Evaluating ten potentially deceptive experimental techniques, we find consistent support for banning certain practices while allowing others.",
keywords = "Deception, economic experiments, ethics, experimental auctions, institutional review boards",
author = "Gregory Colson and Corrigan, {Jay R.} and Carola Grebitus and Loureiro, {Maria L.} and Rousu, {Matthew C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ajae/aav067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "610--621",
journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0002-9092",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which Deceptive Practices, If Any, Should Be Allowed in Experimental Economics Research? Results from Surveys of Applied Experimental Economists and Students

AU - Colson, Gregory

AU - Corrigan, Jay R.

AU - Grebitus, Carola

AU - Loureiro, Maria L.

AU - Rousu, Matthew C.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Deceptive experimental practices are banned in some professions but are standard in others. Recently, the journals of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association introduced guidelines that allow researchers to publish articles that use some forms of deception. However, in their present form, these guidelines leave room for interpretation. This situation is not ideal for researchers, and a clearer definition of which deceptive practices should be banned could be beneficial. Our aim is to help provide greater clarity and potential guidance for journal policies regarding deception by using the results of surveys of both researcher and student subjects. Evaluating ten potentially deceptive experimental techniques, we find consistent support for banning certain practices while allowing others.

AB - Deceptive experimental practices are banned in some professions but are standard in others. Recently, the journals of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association introduced guidelines that allow researchers to publish articles that use some forms of deception. However, in their present form, these guidelines leave room for interpretation. This situation is not ideal for researchers, and a clearer definition of which deceptive practices should be banned could be beneficial. Our aim is to help provide greater clarity and potential guidance for journal policies regarding deception by using the results of surveys of both researcher and student subjects. Evaluating ten potentially deceptive experimental techniques, we find consistent support for banning certain practices while allowing others.

KW - Deception

KW - economic experiments

KW - ethics

KW - experimental auctions

KW - institutional review boards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966333739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966333739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ajae/aav067

DO - 10.1093/ajae/aav067

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84966333739

VL - 98

SP - 610

EP - 621

JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0002-9092

IS - 2

ER -