Which Deceptive Practices, If Any, Should Be Allowed in Experimental Economics Research? Results from Surveys of Applied Experimental Economists and Students

Gregory Colson, Jay R. Corrigan, Carola Grebitus, Maria L. Loureiro, Matthew C. Rousu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Deceptive experimental practices are banned in some professions but are standard in others. Recently, the journals of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association introduced guidelines that allow researchers to publish articles that use some forms of deception. However, in their present form, these guidelines leave room for interpretation. This situation is not ideal for researchers, and a clearer definition of which deceptive practices should be banned could be beneficial. Our aim is to help provide greater clarity and potential guidance for journal policies regarding deception by using the results of surveys of both researcher and student subjects. Evaluating ten potentially deceptive experimental techniques, we find consistent support for banning certain practices while allowing others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-621
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume98
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Deception
  • economic experiments
  • ethics
  • experimental auctions
  • institutional review boards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this