When to use what

Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators

Xiaoyu Gan, Ignacio C. Fernandez, Jie Guo, Maxwell Wilson, Yuanyuan Zhao, Bingbing Zhou, Jianguo Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context Sustainability indices (SIs) have become increasingly important to sustainability research and practice. However, while the validity of SIs is heavily dependent on how their components are weighted and aggregated, the typology and applicability of the existing weighting and aggregation methods remain poorly understood. Objectives To close the knowledge gap regarding when to use which weighting and aggregation methods for constructing SIs, we review the most commonly used methods for weighting and aggregating SIs, discuss their benefits and drawbacks, and suggest a process-oriented approach for choosing appropriate weighting and aggregation methods depending on research objectives. Methods Our review synthesis was based on peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and reports by international organizations, governmental agencies, and research institutions. After carefully examining their principles, characteristics, and applications, we selected and classified the frequently used methods for indicator weighting and aggregation. Results We systematically discuss the benefits and drawbacks of nine weighting methods and three aggregation methods. We propose a four-step process for choosing the most suitable weighting and aggregation methods based on: research purposes, spatial and temporal scales, and sustainability perspectives. Conclusions In this research, we chose the most commonly used methods for weighting and aggregating SIs and analyzed the characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of each method. We found that choosing appropriate weighting and aggregation methods for a specific sustainability assessment project is an extremely important and challenging task. To meet this challenge, we propose a process-oriented approach for properly selecting methods according to the purpose, scale and sustainability concept. This approach can facilitate the proper selection of these methods in sustainability research and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-502
Number of pages12
JournalEcological Indicators
Volume81
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

sustainability
methodology
method
Sustainability indicators
Weighting
project assessment
international organizations
research institutions
research institution
peers
selection methods
international organization
typology
index
Sustainability index
synthesis
Sustainability

Keywords

  • Aggregation
  • Indicator framework
  • Sustainability indicators
  • Sustainability indices
  • Weighting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

When to use what : Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators. / Gan, Xiaoyu; Fernandez, Ignacio C.; Guo, Jie; Wilson, Maxwell; Zhao, Yuanyuan; Zhou, Bingbing; Wu, Jianguo.

In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 81, 01.10.2017, p. 491-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gan, Xiaoyu ; Fernandez, Ignacio C. ; Guo, Jie ; Wilson, Maxwell ; Zhao, Yuanyuan ; Zhou, Bingbing ; Wu, Jianguo. / When to use what : Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators. In: Ecological Indicators. 2017 ; Vol. 81. pp. 491-502.
@article{2ed4e0050bd2461dada5bfcbe942da85,
title = "When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators",
abstract = "Context Sustainability indices (SIs) have become increasingly important to sustainability research and practice. However, while the validity of SIs is heavily dependent on how their components are weighted and aggregated, the typology and applicability of the existing weighting and aggregation methods remain poorly understood. Objectives To close the knowledge gap regarding when to use which weighting and aggregation methods for constructing SIs, we review the most commonly used methods for weighting and aggregating SIs, discuss their benefits and drawbacks, and suggest a process-oriented approach for choosing appropriate weighting and aggregation methods depending on research objectives. Methods Our review synthesis was based on peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and reports by international organizations, governmental agencies, and research institutions. After carefully examining their principles, characteristics, and applications, we selected and classified the frequently used methods for indicator weighting and aggregation. Results We systematically discuss the benefits and drawbacks of nine weighting methods and three aggregation methods. We propose a four-step process for choosing the most suitable weighting and aggregation methods based on: research purposes, spatial and temporal scales, and sustainability perspectives. Conclusions In this research, we chose the most commonly used methods for weighting and aggregating SIs and analyzed the characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of each method. We found that choosing appropriate weighting and aggregation methods for a specific sustainability assessment project is an extremely important and challenging task. To meet this challenge, we propose a process-oriented approach for properly selecting methods according to the purpose, scale and sustainability concept. This approach can facilitate the proper selection of these methods in sustainability research and practice.",
keywords = "Aggregation, Indicator framework, Sustainability indicators, Sustainability indices, Weighting",
author = "Xiaoyu Gan and Fernandez, {Ignacio C.} and Jie Guo and Maxwell Wilson and Yuanyuan Zhao and Bingbing Zhou and Jianguo Wu",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "491--502",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When to use what

T2 - Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators

AU - Gan, Xiaoyu

AU - Fernandez, Ignacio C.

AU - Guo, Jie

AU - Wilson, Maxwell

AU - Zhao, Yuanyuan

AU - Zhou, Bingbing

AU - Wu, Jianguo

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Context Sustainability indices (SIs) have become increasingly important to sustainability research and practice. However, while the validity of SIs is heavily dependent on how their components are weighted and aggregated, the typology and applicability of the existing weighting and aggregation methods remain poorly understood. Objectives To close the knowledge gap regarding when to use which weighting and aggregation methods for constructing SIs, we review the most commonly used methods for weighting and aggregating SIs, discuss their benefits and drawbacks, and suggest a process-oriented approach for choosing appropriate weighting and aggregation methods depending on research objectives. Methods Our review synthesis was based on peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and reports by international organizations, governmental agencies, and research institutions. After carefully examining their principles, characteristics, and applications, we selected and classified the frequently used methods for indicator weighting and aggregation. Results We systematically discuss the benefits and drawbacks of nine weighting methods and three aggregation methods. We propose a four-step process for choosing the most suitable weighting and aggregation methods based on: research purposes, spatial and temporal scales, and sustainability perspectives. Conclusions In this research, we chose the most commonly used methods for weighting and aggregating SIs and analyzed the characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of each method. We found that choosing appropriate weighting and aggregation methods for a specific sustainability assessment project is an extremely important and challenging task. To meet this challenge, we propose a process-oriented approach for properly selecting methods according to the purpose, scale and sustainability concept. This approach can facilitate the proper selection of these methods in sustainability research and practice.

AB - Context Sustainability indices (SIs) have become increasingly important to sustainability research and practice. However, while the validity of SIs is heavily dependent on how their components are weighted and aggregated, the typology and applicability of the existing weighting and aggregation methods remain poorly understood. Objectives To close the knowledge gap regarding when to use which weighting and aggregation methods for constructing SIs, we review the most commonly used methods for weighting and aggregating SIs, discuss their benefits and drawbacks, and suggest a process-oriented approach for choosing appropriate weighting and aggregation methods depending on research objectives. Methods Our review synthesis was based on peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and reports by international organizations, governmental agencies, and research institutions. After carefully examining their principles, characteristics, and applications, we selected and classified the frequently used methods for indicator weighting and aggregation. Results We systematically discuss the benefits and drawbacks of nine weighting methods and three aggregation methods. We propose a four-step process for choosing the most suitable weighting and aggregation methods based on: research purposes, spatial and temporal scales, and sustainability perspectives. Conclusions In this research, we chose the most commonly used methods for weighting and aggregating SIs and analyzed the characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of each method. We found that choosing appropriate weighting and aggregation methods for a specific sustainability assessment project is an extremely important and challenging task. To meet this challenge, we propose a process-oriented approach for properly selecting methods according to the purpose, scale and sustainability concept. This approach can facilitate the proper selection of these methods in sustainability research and practice.

KW - Aggregation

KW - Indicator framework

KW - Sustainability indicators

KW - Sustainability indices

KW - Weighting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021392696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021392696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068

M3 - Review article

VL - 81

SP - 491

EP - 502

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -