TY - JOUR
T1 - When the Perpetrator Is a Partner
T2 - Arrest and Charging Decisions in Intimate Partner Sexual Assault Cases—A Focal Concerns Analysis
AU - O’Neal, Eryn Nicole
AU - Spohn, Cassia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Law enforcement officials and prosecutors have been called “gatekeepers” of the criminal justice system, as their discretionary decisions determine case outcomes. Using the focal concerns perspective as our theoretical foundation, we explore the factors that influence arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assaults (IPSA) reported to Los Angeles law enforcement in 2008. Quantitative findings are supplemented with qualitative examples from Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) detectives interviewed in 2010 and charge evaluation sheets from complaints referred to Los Angeles prosecution in 2008. Attempting to expand its theoretical relevance, we develop an alternative conceptualization and operationalization of the focal concerns perspective that is more appropriate to IPSA cases. Findings suggest that arrest decisions are motivated by suspect blameworthiness, community protection, and practical constraints and organizational consequences. In addition, charging decisions are influenced by community protection and practical constraints. Extralegal factors did not influence decision making. Directions for future research are discussed.
AB - Law enforcement officials and prosecutors have been called “gatekeepers” of the criminal justice system, as their discretionary decisions determine case outcomes. Using the focal concerns perspective as our theoretical foundation, we explore the factors that influence arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assaults (IPSA) reported to Los Angeles law enforcement in 2008. Quantitative findings are supplemented with qualitative examples from Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) detectives interviewed in 2010 and charge evaluation sheets from complaints referred to Los Angeles prosecution in 2008. Attempting to expand its theoretical relevance, we develop an alternative conceptualization and operationalization of the focal concerns perspective that is more appropriate to IPSA cases. Findings suggest that arrest decisions are motivated by suspect blameworthiness, community protection, and practical constraints and organizational consequences. In addition, charging decisions are influenced by community protection and practical constraints. Extralegal factors did not influence decision making. Directions for future research are discussed.
KW - case processing
KW - focal concerns
KW - intimate partner violence
KW - police decision making
KW - prosecutorial decision making
KW - sexual assault
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016235751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016235751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1077801216650289
DO - 10.1177/1077801216650289
M3 - Article
C2 - 27271777
AN - SCOPUS:85016235751
SN - 1077-8012
VL - 23
SP - 707
EP - 729
JO - Violence Against Women
JF - Violence Against Women
IS - 6
ER -