When the Perpetrator Is a Partner: Arrest and Charging Decisions in Intimate Partner Sexual Assault Cases—A Focal Concerns Analysis

Eryn Nicole O’Neal, Cassia Spohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Law enforcement officials and prosecutors have been called “gatekeepers” of the criminal justice system, as their discretionary decisions determine case outcomes. Using the focal concerns perspective as our theoretical foundation, we explore the factors that influence arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assaults (IPSA) reported to Los Angeles law enforcement in 2008. Quantitative findings are supplemented with qualitative examples from Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) detectives interviewed in 2010 and charge evaluation sheets from complaints referred to Los Angeles prosecution in 2008. Attempting to expand its theoretical relevance, we develop an alternative conceptualization and operationalization of the focal concerns perspective that is more appropriate to IPSA cases. Findings suggest that arrest decisions are motivated by suspect blameworthiness, community protection, and practical constraints and organizational consequences. In addition, charging decisions are influenced by community protection and practical constraints. Extralegal factors did not influence decision making. Directions for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)707-729
Number of pages23
JournalViolence Against Women
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

assault
law enforcement
gatekeeper
operationalization
prosecution
complaint
community
police
justice
decision making
evaluation

Keywords

  • case processing
  • focal concerns
  • intimate partner violence
  • police decision making
  • prosecutorial decision making
  • sexual assault

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

When the Perpetrator Is a Partner : Arrest and Charging Decisions in Intimate Partner Sexual Assault Cases—A Focal Concerns Analysis. / O’Neal, Eryn Nicole; Spohn, Cassia.

In: Violence Against Women, Vol. 23, No. 6, 01.05.2017, p. 707-729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c6d8dfbdc1d4b8ea6ef0de870ab4f12,
title = "When the Perpetrator Is a Partner: Arrest and Charging Decisions in Intimate Partner Sexual Assault Cases—A Focal Concerns Analysis",
abstract = "Law enforcement officials and prosecutors have been called “gatekeepers” of the criminal justice system, as their discretionary decisions determine case outcomes. Using the focal concerns perspective as our theoretical foundation, we explore the factors that influence arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assaults (IPSA) reported to Los Angeles law enforcement in 2008. Quantitative findings are supplemented with qualitative examples from Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) detectives interviewed in 2010 and charge evaluation sheets from complaints referred to Los Angeles prosecution in 2008. Attempting to expand its theoretical relevance, we develop an alternative conceptualization and operationalization of the focal concerns perspective that is more appropriate to IPSA cases. Findings suggest that arrest decisions are motivated by suspect blameworthiness, community protection, and practical constraints and organizational consequences. In addition, charging decisions are influenced by community protection and practical constraints. Extralegal factors did not influence decision making. Directions for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "case processing, focal concerns, intimate partner violence, police decision making, prosecutorial decision making, sexual assault",
author = "O’Neal, {Eryn Nicole} and Cassia Spohn",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077801216650289",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "707--729",
journal = "Violence Against Women",
issn = "1077-8012",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When the Perpetrator Is a Partner

T2 - Arrest and Charging Decisions in Intimate Partner Sexual Assault Cases—A Focal Concerns Analysis

AU - O’Neal, Eryn Nicole

AU - Spohn, Cassia

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Law enforcement officials and prosecutors have been called “gatekeepers” of the criminal justice system, as their discretionary decisions determine case outcomes. Using the focal concerns perspective as our theoretical foundation, we explore the factors that influence arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assaults (IPSA) reported to Los Angeles law enforcement in 2008. Quantitative findings are supplemented with qualitative examples from Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) detectives interviewed in 2010 and charge evaluation sheets from complaints referred to Los Angeles prosecution in 2008. Attempting to expand its theoretical relevance, we develop an alternative conceptualization and operationalization of the focal concerns perspective that is more appropriate to IPSA cases. Findings suggest that arrest decisions are motivated by suspect blameworthiness, community protection, and practical constraints and organizational consequences. In addition, charging decisions are influenced by community protection and practical constraints. Extralegal factors did not influence decision making. Directions for future research are discussed.

AB - Law enforcement officials and prosecutors have been called “gatekeepers” of the criminal justice system, as their discretionary decisions determine case outcomes. Using the focal concerns perspective as our theoretical foundation, we explore the factors that influence arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assaults (IPSA) reported to Los Angeles law enforcement in 2008. Quantitative findings are supplemented with qualitative examples from Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) detectives interviewed in 2010 and charge evaluation sheets from complaints referred to Los Angeles prosecution in 2008. Attempting to expand its theoretical relevance, we develop an alternative conceptualization and operationalization of the focal concerns perspective that is more appropriate to IPSA cases. Findings suggest that arrest decisions are motivated by suspect blameworthiness, community protection, and practical constraints and organizational consequences. In addition, charging decisions are influenced by community protection and practical constraints. Extralegal factors did not influence decision making. Directions for future research are discussed.

KW - case processing

KW - focal concerns

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - police decision making

KW - prosecutorial decision making

KW - sexual assault

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016235751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016235751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077801216650289

DO - 10.1177/1077801216650289

M3 - Article

C2 - 27271777

AN - SCOPUS:85016235751

VL - 23

SP - 707

EP - 729

JO - Violence Against Women

JF - Violence Against Women

SN - 1077-8012

IS - 6

ER -