When Territoriality Meets Agency: An Examination of Employee Guarding as a Territorial Strategy

Timothy M. Gardner, Timothy P. Munyon, Peter Hom, Rodger W. Griffeth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Do managers behave territorially toward their employees? Despite accumulating evidence demonstrating the prevalence of territoriality over nonagentic organizational resources, key questions remain regarding the extent to which psychological ownership and territorial behavior occur within supervisor-subordinate relationships. To explore this question, we drew on territoriality and mate-guarding theory to ascertain how and why managers might utilize one form of territoriality, anticipatory defenses, toward their employees. In a four-study investigation, we find that managers consistently engage in two forms of anticipatory defense tactics, persuasion and nurturing, that are intended to defend ownership claims over their employees and limit employee defection. Our results demonstrate a positive relationship between psychological ownership of subordinates and employee guarding directed toward those subordinates. We also find that managers engage in employee guarding more when they anticipate an employee is likely to defect, and they adapt guarding tactics in response to the subordinate’s general mental ability. Collectively, our results identify the motivations and conditions under which supervisors act territorially toward agentic subordinates, contributing to theory in territoriality and downward social influence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2580-2610
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Management
Volume44
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Employees
Territoriality
Managers
Psychological ownership
Supervisors
Tactics
Defects
Ownership
Social influence
Organizational resources
Persuasion

Keywords

  • defection
  • downward influence tactics
  • employee guarding
  • psychological ownership
  • supervisor-subordinate relationship
  • territoriality
  • turnover

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

When Territoriality Meets Agency : An Examination of Employee Guarding as a Territorial Strategy. / Gardner, Timothy M.; Munyon, Timothy P.; Hom, Peter; Griffeth, Rodger W.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 44, No. 7, 01.09.2018, p. 2580-2610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gardner, Timothy M. ; Munyon, Timothy P. ; Hom, Peter ; Griffeth, Rodger W. / When Territoriality Meets Agency : An Examination of Employee Guarding as a Territorial Strategy. In: Journal of Management. 2018 ; Vol. 44, No. 7. pp. 2580-2610.
@article{9d3056cf1dac43b8bcbdf94126664255,
title = "When Territoriality Meets Agency: An Examination of Employee Guarding as a Territorial Strategy",
abstract = "Do managers behave territorially toward their employees? Despite accumulating evidence demonstrating the prevalence of territoriality over nonagentic organizational resources, key questions remain regarding the extent to which psychological ownership and territorial behavior occur within supervisor-subordinate relationships. To explore this question, we drew on territoriality and mate-guarding theory to ascertain how and why managers might utilize one form of territoriality, anticipatory defenses, toward their employees. In a four-study investigation, we find that managers consistently engage in two forms of anticipatory defense tactics, persuasion and nurturing, that are intended to defend ownership claims over their employees and limit employee defection. Our results demonstrate a positive relationship between psychological ownership of subordinates and employee guarding directed toward those subordinates. We also find that managers engage in employee guarding more when they anticipate an employee is likely to defect, and they adapt guarding tactics in response to the subordinate’s general mental ability. Collectively, our results identify the motivations and conditions under which supervisors act territorially toward agentic subordinates, contributing to theory in territoriality and downward social influence.",
keywords = "defection, downward influence tactics, employee guarding, psychological ownership, supervisor-subordinate relationship, territoriality, turnover",
author = "Gardner, {Timothy M.} and Munyon, {Timothy P.} and Peter Hom and Griffeth, {Rodger W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0149206316642272",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "2580--2610",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When Territoriality Meets Agency

T2 - An Examination of Employee Guarding as a Territorial Strategy

AU - Gardner, Timothy M.

AU - Munyon, Timothy P.

AU - Hom, Peter

AU - Griffeth, Rodger W.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Do managers behave territorially toward their employees? Despite accumulating evidence demonstrating the prevalence of territoriality over nonagentic organizational resources, key questions remain regarding the extent to which psychological ownership and territorial behavior occur within supervisor-subordinate relationships. To explore this question, we drew on territoriality and mate-guarding theory to ascertain how and why managers might utilize one form of territoriality, anticipatory defenses, toward their employees. In a four-study investigation, we find that managers consistently engage in two forms of anticipatory defense tactics, persuasion and nurturing, that are intended to defend ownership claims over their employees and limit employee defection. Our results demonstrate a positive relationship between psychological ownership of subordinates and employee guarding directed toward those subordinates. We also find that managers engage in employee guarding more when they anticipate an employee is likely to defect, and they adapt guarding tactics in response to the subordinate’s general mental ability. Collectively, our results identify the motivations and conditions under which supervisors act territorially toward agentic subordinates, contributing to theory in territoriality and downward social influence.

AB - Do managers behave territorially toward their employees? Despite accumulating evidence demonstrating the prevalence of territoriality over nonagentic organizational resources, key questions remain regarding the extent to which psychological ownership and territorial behavior occur within supervisor-subordinate relationships. To explore this question, we drew on territoriality and mate-guarding theory to ascertain how and why managers might utilize one form of territoriality, anticipatory defenses, toward their employees. In a four-study investigation, we find that managers consistently engage in two forms of anticipatory defense tactics, persuasion and nurturing, that are intended to defend ownership claims over their employees and limit employee defection. Our results demonstrate a positive relationship between psychological ownership of subordinates and employee guarding directed toward those subordinates. We also find that managers engage in employee guarding more when they anticipate an employee is likely to defect, and they adapt guarding tactics in response to the subordinate’s general mental ability. Collectively, our results identify the motivations and conditions under which supervisors act territorially toward agentic subordinates, contributing to theory in territoriality and downward social influence.

KW - defection

KW - downward influence tactics

KW - employee guarding

KW - psychological ownership

KW - supervisor-subordinate relationship

KW - territoriality

KW - turnover

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048441474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048441474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0149206316642272

DO - 10.1177/0149206316642272

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048441474

VL - 44

SP - 2580

EP - 2610

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 7

ER -