When is a word a word

The development of word knowledge

Ray Buss, Robert C. Coon, Elizabeth B. Williford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine if children’s increasing knowledge of wordness could be characterized as conforming to a system of successively mastered levels of understanding similar to acquisitions in a number of other cognitive domains. Stimuli differing on dimensions of word appearance and meaning were presented to first-, third-, fifth-, and seventh-grade students and to college students, who were required to identify whether or not each stimulus was a word and to indicate their certainty about these decisions. The validity of a hierarchical system of levels of understanding of wordness was confirmed. In addition, developmental predictions about accuracy and certainty were supported. It was concluded that children’s word knowledge is not unidimensional but involves several underlying component processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-278
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Genetic Psychology
Volume148
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stimulus
Students
student
acquisition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

When is a word a word : The development of word knowledge. / Buss, Ray; Coon, Robert C.; Williford, Elizabeth B.

In: Journal of Genetic Psychology, Vol. 148, No. 3, 1987, p. 271-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buss, Ray ; Coon, Robert C. ; Williford, Elizabeth B. / When is a word a word : The development of word knowledge. In: Journal of Genetic Psychology. 1987 ; Vol. 148, No. 3. pp. 271-278.
@article{3cae704e8e774c5981ca71d0ada84ac0,
title = "When is a word a word: The development of word knowledge",
abstract = "The present study was conducted to determine if children’s increasing knowledge of wordness could be characterized as conforming to a system of successively mastered levels of understanding similar to acquisitions in a number of other cognitive domains. Stimuli differing on dimensions of word appearance and meaning were presented to first-, third-, fifth-, and seventh-grade students and to college students, who were required to identify whether or not each stimulus was a word and to indicate their certainty about these decisions. The validity of a hierarchical system of levels of understanding of wordness was confirmed. In addition, developmental predictions about accuracy and certainty were supported. It was concluded that children’s word knowledge is not unidimensional but involves several underlying component processes.",
author = "Ray Buss and Coon, {Robert C.} and Williford, {Elizabeth B.}",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1080/00221325.1987.9914557",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "271--278",
journal = "Journal of Genetic Psychology",
issn = "0022-1325",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When is a word a word

T2 - The development of word knowledge

AU - Buss, Ray

AU - Coon, Robert C.

AU - Williford, Elizabeth B.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - The present study was conducted to determine if children’s increasing knowledge of wordness could be characterized as conforming to a system of successively mastered levels of understanding similar to acquisitions in a number of other cognitive domains. Stimuli differing on dimensions of word appearance and meaning were presented to first-, third-, fifth-, and seventh-grade students and to college students, who were required to identify whether or not each stimulus was a word and to indicate their certainty about these decisions. The validity of a hierarchical system of levels of understanding of wordness was confirmed. In addition, developmental predictions about accuracy and certainty were supported. It was concluded that children’s word knowledge is not unidimensional but involves several underlying component processes.

AB - The present study was conducted to determine if children’s increasing knowledge of wordness could be characterized as conforming to a system of successively mastered levels of understanding similar to acquisitions in a number of other cognitive domains. Stimuli differing on dimensions of word appearance and meaning were presented to first-, third-, fifth-, and seventh-grade students and to college students, who were required to identify whether or not each stimulus was a word and to indicate their certainty about these decisions. The validity of a hierarchical system of levels of understanding of wordness was confirmed. In addition, developmental predictions about accuracy and certainty were supported. It was concluded that children’s word knowledge is not unidimensional but involves several underlying component processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950941248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84950941248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00221325.1987.9914557

DO - 10.1080/00221325.1987.9914557

M3 - Article

VL - 148

SP - 271

EP - 278

JO - Journal of Genetic Psychology

JF - Journal of Genetic Psychology

SN - 0022-1325

IS - 3

ER -