When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations

Edward Wellman, David M. Mayer, Madeline Ong, D. Scott DeRue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Organization members who engage in "moral objection" by taking a principled stand against ethically questionable activities help to prevent such activities from persisting. Unfortunately, research suggests that they also may be perceived as less warm (i.e., pleasant, nice) than members who comply with ethically questionable procedures. In this article, we draw on role theory to explore how legitimate power influences observers' responses to moral objection. We argue that individuals expect those high in legitimate power to engage in moral objection, but expect those low in legitimate power to comply with ethically questionable practices. We further propose that these contrasting role expectations influence the extent to which moral objectors are perceived as warm and subjected to social sanctions (i.e., insults, pressure, unfriendly behavior). We test our predictions with 3 experiments. Study 1, which draws on participants' prior workplace experiences, supports the first section of our mediated moderation model in which the negative association between an actor's moral objection (vs. compliance) and observers' warmth perceptions is weaker when the actor is high rather than low in legitimate power and this effect is mediated by observers' met role expectations. Study 2, an online experiment featuring a biased hiring task, reveals that the warmth perceptions fostered by the Behavior × Legitimate Power interaction influence observers' social sanctioning intentions. Finally, Study 3, a laboratory experiment which exposes participants to unethical behavior in a virtual team task, replicates Study 2's findings and extends the results to actual as well as intended social sanctions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)793-814
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume101
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Organizations
Workplace
Compliance
Power (Psychology)
Pressure
Research

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Legitimate power
  • Person perception
  • Role theory
  • Social sanctions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations. / Wellman, Edward; Mayer, David M.; Ong, Madeline; DeRue, D. Scott.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 101, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 793-814.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6dca32b7cd634ebb8deabf8696809094,
title = "When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations",
abstract = "Organization members who engage in {"}moral objection{"} by taking a principled stand against ethically questionable activities help to prevent such activities from persisting. Unfortunately, research suggests that they also may be perceived as less warm (i.e., pleasant, nice) than members who comply with ethically questionable procedures. In this article, we draw on role theory to explore how legitimate power influences observers' responses to moral objection. We argue that individuals expect those high in legitimate power to engage in moral objection, but expect those low in legitimate power to comply with ethically questionable practices. We further propose that these contrasting role expectations influence the extent to which moral objectors are perceived as warm and subjected to social sanctions (i.e., insults, pressure, unfriendly behavior). We test our predictions with 3 experiments. Study 1, which draws on participants' prior workplace experiences, supports the first section of our mediated moderation model in which the negative association between an actor's moral objection (vs. compliance) and observers' warmth perceptions is weaker when the actor is high rather than low in legitimate power and this effect is mediated by observers' met role expectations. Study 2, an online experiment featuring a biased hiring task, reveals that the warmth perceptions fostered by the Behavior × Legitimate Power interaction influence observers' social sanctioning intentions. Finally, Study 3, a laboratory experiment which exposes participants to unethical behavior in a virtual team task, replicates Study 2's findings and extends the results to actual as well as intended social sanctions.",
keywords = "Ethics, Legitimate power, Person perception, Role theory, Social sanctions",
author = "Edward Wellman and Mayer, {David M.} and Madeline Ong and DeRue, {D. Scott}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/apl0000094",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "793--814",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations

AU - Wellman, Edward

AU - Mayer, David M.

AU - Ong, Madeline

AU - DeRue, D. Scott

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Organization members who engage in "moral objection" by taking a principled stand against ethically questionable activities help to prevent such activities from persisting. Unfortunately, research suggests that they also may be perceived as less warm (i.e., pleasant, nice) than members who comply with ethically questionable procedures. In this article, we draw on role theory to explore how legitimate power influences observers' responses to moral objection. We argue that individuals expect those high in legitimate power to engage in moral objection, but expect those low in legitimate power to comply with ethically questionable practices. We further propose that these contrasting role expectations influence the extent to which moral objectors are perceived as warm and subjected to social sanctions (i.e., insults, pressure, unfriendly behavior). We test our predictions with 3 experiments. Study 1, which draws on participants' prior workplace experiences, supports the first section of our mediated moderation model in which the negative association between an actor's moral objection (vs. compliance) and observers' warmth perceptions is weaker when the actor is high rather than low in legitimate power and this effect is mediated by observers' met role expectations. Study 2, an online experiment featuring a biased hiring task, reveals that the warmth perceptions fostered by the Behavior × Legitimate Power interaction influence observers' social sanctioning intentions. Finally, Study 3, a laboratory experiment which exposes participants to unethical behavior in a virtual team task, replicates Study 2's findings and extends the results to actual as well as intended social sanctions.

AB - Organization members who engage in "moral objection" by taking a principled stand against ethically questionable activities help to prevent such activities from persisting. Unfortunately, research suggests that they also may be perceived as less warm (i.e., pleasant, nice) than members who comply with ethically questionable procedures. In this article, we draw on role theory to explore how legitimate power influences observers' responses to moral objection. We argue that individuals expect those high in legitimate power to engage in moral objection, but expect those low in legitimate power to comply with ethically questionable practices. We further propose that these contrasting role expectations influence the extent to which moral objectors are perceived as warm and subjected to social sanctions (i.e., insults, pressure, unfriendly behavior). We test our predictions with 3 experiments. Study 1, which draws on participants' prior workplace experiences, supports the first section of our mediated moderation model in which the negative association between an actor's moral objection (vs. compliance) and observers' warmth perceptions is weaker when the actor is high rather than low in legitimate power and this effect is mediated by observers' met role expectations. Study 2, an online experiment featuring a biased hiring task, reveals that the warmth perceptions fostered by the Behavior × Legitimate Power interaction influence observers' social sanctioning intentions. Finally, Study 3, a laboratory experiment which exposes participants to unethical behavior in a virtual team task, replicates Study 2's findings and extends the results to actual as well as intended social sanctions.

KW - Ethics

KW - Legitimate power

KW - Person perception

KW - Role theory

KW - Social sanctions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958019562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958019562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/apl0000094

DO - 10.1037/apl0000094

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 793

EP - 814

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 6

ER -