When are cross-group differences a product of a human behavioral immune system?

Daniel Hruschka, Joseph Hackman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several scholars have proposed that behavioral immune responses can account for worldwide human diversity in several behavioral and cognitive domains. Testing such claims generally relies on observational, cross-population data sets, posing challenges for causal inference. In this paper we describe four key pitfalls to using such data to test hypotheses for cross-population diversity based on a behavioral immune system. These issues are associated with (a) representativeness of sampling populations, (b) statistical artifacts of aggregation, (c) clustered data, and (d) spurious associations through unmeasured variables. We argue that these issues can be mitigated through careful attention to research design, analytic strategies, and serious treatments of alternative hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-273
Number of pages9
JournalEvolutionary Behavioral Sciences
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Immune System
Population
Artifacts
Research Design
Datasets

Keywords

  • Behavioral immune system
  • Comparative
  • Cross-cultural
  • Cross-population
  • Pathogen stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

When are cross-group differences a product of a human behavioral immune system? / Hruschka, Daniel; Hackman, Joseph.

In: Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.10.2014, p. 265-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f49619175c63434bbf6ddd60b5587869,
title = "When are cross-group differences a product of a human behavioral immune system?",
abstract = "Several scholars have proposed that behavioral immune responses can account for worldwide human diversity in several behavioral and cognitive domains. Testing such claims generally relies on observational, cross-population data sets, posing challenges for causal inference. In this paper we describe four key pitfalls to using such data to test hypotheses for cross-population diversity based on a behavioral immune system. These issues are associated with (a) representativeness of sampling populations, (b) statistical artifacts of aggregation, (c) clustered data, and (d) spurious associations through unmeasured variables. We argue that these issues can be mitigated through careful attention to research design, analytic strategies, and serious treatments of alternative hypotheses.",
keywords = "Behavioral immune system, Comparative, Cross-cultural, Cross-population, Pathogen stress",
author = "Daniel Hruschka and Joseph Hackman",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/ebs0000013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "265--273",
journal = "Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences",
issn = "2330-2925",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When are cross-group differences a product of a human behavioral immune system?

AU - Hruschka, Daniel

AU - Hackman, Joseph

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Several scholars have proposed that behavioral immune responses can account for worldwide human diversity in several behavioral and cognitive domains. Testing such claims generally relies on observational, cross-population data sets, posing challenges for causal inference. In this paper we describe four key pitfalls to using such data to test hypotheses for cross-population diversity based on a behavioral immune system. These issues are associated with (a) representativeness of sampling populations, (b) statistical artifacts of aggregation, (c) clustered data, and (d) spurious associations through unmeasured variables. We argue that these issues can be mitigated through careful attention to research design, analytic strategies, and serious treatments of alternative hypotheses.

AB - Several scholars have proposed that behavioral immune responses can account for worldwide human diversity in several behavioral and cognitive domains. Testing such claims generally relies on observational, cross-population data sets, posing challenges for causal inference. In this paper we describe four key pitfalls to using such data to test hypotheses for cross-population diversity based on a behavioral immune system. These issues are associated with (a) representativeness of sampling populations, (b) statistical artifacts of aggregation, (c) clustered data, and (d) spurious associations through unmeasured variables. We argue that these issues can be mitigated through careful attention to research design, analytic strategies, and serious treatments of alternative hypotheses.

KW - Behavioral immune system

KW - Comparative

KW - Cross-cultural

KW - Cross-population

KW - Pathogen stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964327163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964327163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/ebs0000013

DO - 10.1037/ebs0000013

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 265

EP - 273

JO - Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences

JF - Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences

SN - 2330-2925

IS - 4

ER -