What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation

An Assessment of Systematic Reviews

David Weisburd, David P. Farrington, Charlotte Gill, Mimi Ajzenstadt, Trevor Bennett, Kate Bowers, Michael S. Caudy, Katy Holloway, Shane Johnson, Friedrich Lösel, Jacqueline Mallender, Amanda Perry, Liansheng Larry Tang, Faye Taxman, Cody Telep, Rory Tierney, Maria M. Ttofi, Carolyn Watson, David B. Wilson, Alese Wooditch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research Summary: Just four decades ago, the predominant narrative in crime prevention and rehabilitation was that nothing works. Since that time, criminologists have accumulated a wide body of evidence about programs and practices in systematic reviews. In this article, we summarize what is known in seven broad criminal justice areas by drawing on 118 systematic reviews. Although not everything works, through our “review of reviews,” we provide persuasive evidence of the effectiveness of programs, policies, and practices across a variety of intervention areas. Policy Implications: It is time to abandon the idea that “nothing works,” not only in corrections but also in developmental, community, and situational prevention; sentencing; policing; and drug treatment. Nevertheless, key gaps remain in our knowledge base. The results of systematic reviews should provide more specific guidance to practitioners. In many areas few randomized evaluations have been conducted. Finally, researchers, through their studies and systematic reviews, must pay more attention to cost–benefit analysis, qualitative research, and descriptive validity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-449
Number of pages35
JournalCriminology and Public Policy
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

crime prevention
rehabilitation
evidence
qualitative research
justice
drug
narrative
Rehabilitation
Systematic Review
Crime Prevention
evaluation
community
time

Keywords

  • crime prevention
  • meta-analysis
  • program evaluation
  • rehabilitation
  • systematic reviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

Weisburd, D., Farrington, D. P., Gill, C., Ajzenstadt, M., Bennett, T., Bowers, K., ... Wooditch, A. (2017). What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation: An Assessment of Systematic Reviews. Criminology and Public Policy, 16(2), 415-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12298

What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation : An Assessment of Systematic Reviews. / Weisburd, David; Farrington, David P.; Gill, Charlotte; Ajzenstadt, Mimi; Bennett, Trevor; Bowers, Kate; Caudy, Michael S.; Holloway, Katy; Johnson, Shane; Lösel, Friedrich; Mallender, Jacqueline; Perry, Amanda; Tang, Liansheng Larry; Taxman, Faye; Telep, Cody; Tierney, Rory; Ttofi, Maria M.; Watson, Carolyn; Wilson, David B.; Wooditch, Alese.

In: Criminology and Public Policy, Vol. 16, No. 2, 01.05.2017, p. 415-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weisburd, D, Farrington, DP, Gill, C, Ajzenstadt, M, Bennett, T, Bowers, K, Caudy, MS, Holloway, K, Johnson, S, Lösel, F, Mallender, J, Perry, A, Tang, LL, Taxman, F, Telep, C, Tierney, R, Ttofi, MM, Watson, C, Wilson, DB & Wooditch, A 2017, 'What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation: An Assessment of Systematic Reviews', Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 415-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12298
Weisburd D, Farrington DP, Gill C, Ajzenstadt M, Bennett T, Bowers K et al. What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation: An Assessment of Systematic Reviews. Criminology and Public Policy. 2017 May 1;16(2):415-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12298
Weisburd, David ; Farrington, David P. ; Gill, Charlotte ; Ajzenstadt, Mimi ; Bennett, Trevor ; Bowers, Kate ; Caudy, Michael S. ; Holloway, Katy ; Johnson, Shane ; Lösel, Friedrich ; Mallender, Jacqueline ; Perry, Amanda ; Tang, Liansheng Larry ; Taxman, Faye ; Telep, Cody ; Tierney, Rory ; Ttofi, Maria M. ; Watson, Carolyn ; Wilson, David B. ; Wooditch, Alese. / What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation : An Assessment of Systematic Reviews. In: Criminology and Public Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 415-449.
@article{415bfd9b2cba4f7da24314ade7506252,
title = "What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation: An Assessment of Systematic Reviews",
abstract = "Research Summary: Just four decades ago, the predominant narrative in crime prevention and rehabilitation was that nothing works. Since that time, criminologists have accumulated a wide body of evidence about programs and practices in systematic reviews. In this article, we summarize what is known in seven broad criminal justice areas by drawing on 118 systematic reviews. Although not everything works, through our “review of reviews,” we provide persuasive evidence of the effectiveness of programs, policies, and practices across a variety of intervention areas. Policy Implications: It is time to abandon the idea that “nothing works,” not only in corrections but also in developmental, community, and situational prevention; sentencing; policing; and drug treatment. Nevertheless, key gaps remain in our knowledge base. The results of systematic reviews should provide more specific guidance to practitioners. In many areas few randomized evaluations have been conducted. Finally, researchers, through their studies and systematic reviews, must pay more attention to cost–benefit analysis, qualitative research, and descriptive validity.",
keywords = "crime prevention, meta-analysis, program evaluation, rehabilitation, systematic reviews",
author = "David Weisburd and Farrington, {David P.} and Charlotte Gill and Mimi Ajzenstadt and Trevor Bennett and Kate Bowers and Caudy, {Michael S.} and Katy Holloway and Shane Johnson and Friedrich L{\"o}sel and Jacqueline Mallender and Amanda Perry and Tang, {Liansheng Larry} and Faye Taxman and Cody Telep and Rory Tierney and Ttofi, {Maria M.} and Carolyn Watson and Wilson, {David B.} and Alese Wooditch",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1745-9133.12298",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "415--449",
journal = "Criminology & Public Policy",
issn = "1538-6473",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation

T2 - An Assessment of Systematic Reviews

AU - Weisburd, David

AU - Farrington, David P.

AU - Gill, Charlotte

AU - Ajzenstadt, Mimi

AU - Bennett, Trevor

AU - Bowers, Kate

AU - Caudy, Michael S.

AU - Holloway, Katy

AU - Johnson, Shane

AU - Lösel, Friedrich

AU - Mallender, Jacqueline

AU - Perry, Amanda

AU - Tang, Liansheng Larry

AU - Taxman, Faye

AU - Telep, Cody

AU - Tierney, Rory

AU - Ttofi, Maria M.

AU - Watson, Carolyn

AU - Wilson, David B.

AU - Wooditch, Alese

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Research Summary: Just four decades ago, the predominant narrative in crime prevention and rehabilitation was that nothing works. Since that time, criminologists have accumulated a wide body of evidence about programs and practices in systematic reviews. In this article, we summarize what is known in seven broad criminal justice areas by drawing on 118 systematic reviews. Although not everything works, through our “review of reviews,” we provide persuasive evidence of the effectiveness of programs, policies, and practices across a variety of intervention areas. Policy Implications: It is time to abandon the idea that “nothing works,” not only in corrections but also in developmental, community, and situational prevention; sentencing; policing; and drug treatment. Nevertheless, key gaps remain in our knowledge base. The results of systematic reviews should provide more specific guidance to practitioners. In many areas few randomized evaluations have been conducted. Finally, researchers, through their studies and systematic reviews, must pay more attention to cost–benefit analysis, qualitative research, and descriptive validity.

AB - Research Summary: Just four decades ago, the predominant narrative in crime prevention and rehabilitation was that nothing works. Since that time, criminologists have accumulated a wide body of evidence about programs and practices in systematic reviews. In this article, we summarize what is known in seven broad criminal justice areas by drawing on 118 systematic reviews. Although not everything works, through our “review of reviews,” we provide persuasive evidence of the effectiveness of programs, policies, and practices across a variety of intervention areas. Policy Implications: It is time to abandon the idea that “nothing works,” not only in corrections but also in developmental, community, and situational prevention; sentencing; policing; and drug treatment. Nevertheless, key gaps remain in our knowledge base. The results of systematic reviews should provide more specific guidance to practitioners. In many areas few randomized evaluations have been conducted. Finally, researchers, through their studies and systematic reviews, must pay more attention to cost–benefit analysis, qualitative research, and descriptive validity.

KW - crime prevention

KW - meta-analysis

KW - program evaluation

KW - rehabilitation

KW - systematic reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019615314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019615314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1745-9133.12298

DO - 10.1111/1745-9133.12298

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 415

EP - 449

JO - Criminology & Public Policy

JF - Criminology & Public Policy

SN - 1538-6473

IS - 2

ER -