What we mean by scope and methods

A survey of undergraduate scope and methods courses

Charles C. Turner, Cameron Thies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-reflective political scientists have extensively reviewed the history of the discipline and argued over its future, but to date there has been little effort to systematically survey undergraduate scope and methods courses (for an exception see Thies and Hogan 2005). This lack of data leaves the discipline unable to assess how much we are teaching undergraduates about the scope of political science or, indeed, what we mean by the scope of the discipline. Similarly, though there have been many battles waged over the appropriateness of various methodologies, it is not clear how much of this discussion, or how many of these methods, make it into the undergraduate classroom. Survey results from a nation-wide sample of political science departments indicate that most departments require a scope and methods course of their majors and that, while there is a great deal of variety in topics covered, some common themes exist and some common assignments are used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-373
Number of pages7
JournalPS - Political Science and Politics
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

political science
political scientist
classroom
lack
methodology
Teaching
history

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

What we mean by scope and methods : A survey of undergraduate scope and methods courses. / Turner, Charles C.; Thies, Cameron.

In: PS - Political Science and Politics, Vol. 42, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 367-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ec1b7504d36450790461e9808a5b45f,
title = "What we mean by scope and methods: A survey of undergraduate scope and methods courses",
abstract = "Self-reflective political scientists have extensively reviewed the history of the discipline and argued over its future, but to date there has been little effort to systematically survey undergraduate scope and methods courses (for an exception see Thies and Hogan 2005). This lack of data leaves the discipline unable to assess how much we are teaching undergraduates about the scope of political science or, indeed, what we mean by the scope of the discipline. Similarly, though there have been many battles waged over the appropriateness of various methodologies, it is not clear how much of this discussion, or how many of these methods, make it into the undergraduate classroom. Survey results from a nation-wide sample of political science departments indicate that most departments require a scope and methods course of their majors and that, while there is a great deal of variety in topics covered, some common themes exist and some common assignments are used.",
author = "Turner, {Charles C.} and Cameron Thies",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S1049096509090507",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "367--373",
journal = "PS - Political Science and Politics",
issn = "1049-0965",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What we mean by scope and methods

T2 - A survey of undergraduate scope and methods courses

AU - Turner, Charles C.

AU - Thies, Cameron

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Self-reflective political scientists have extensively reviewed the history of the discipline and argued over its future, but to date there has been little effort to systematically survey undergraduate scope and methods courses (for an exception see Thies and Hogan 2005). This lack of data leaves the discipline unable to assess how much we are teaching undergraduates about the scope of political science or, indeed, what we mean by the scope of the discipline. Similarly, though there have been many battles waged over the appropriateness of various methodologies, it is not clear how much of this discussion, or how many of these methods, make it into the undergraduate classroom. Survey results from a nation-wide sample of political science departments indicate that most departments require a scope and methods course of their majors and that, while there is a great deal of variety in topics covered, some common themes exist and some common assignments are used.

AB - Self-reflective political scientists have extensively reviewed the history of the discipline and argued over its future, but to date there has been little effort to systematically survey undergraduate scope and methods courses (for an exception see Thies and Hogan 2005). This lack of data leaves the discipline unable to assess how much we are teaching undergraduates about the scope of political science or, indeed, what we mean by the scope of the discipline. Similarly, though there have been many battles waged over the appropriateness of various methodologies, it is not clear how much of this discussion, or how many of these methods, make it into the undergraduate classroom. Survey results from a nation-wide sample of political science departments indicate that most departments require a scope and methods course of their majors and that, while there is a great deal of variety in topics covered, some common themes exist and some common assignments are used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68349087933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68349087933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1049096509090507

DO - 10.1017/S1049096509090507

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 367

EP - 373

JO - PS - Political Science and Politics

JF - PS - Political Science and Politics

SN - 1049-0965

IS - 2

ER -