What Sort of Mind/Brain Is Compatible with Cultural Adaptation?

Peter J. Richerson, Robert T. Boyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cultural evolution is substantially driven by agentic forces and rather less by the random variation and natural selection that dominate the evolution of genes. Reinforcement based decisions (attractors) keep cultural evolution tolerably on track of genetic fitness. Reinforcement can come from a variety of proximate mechanisms ranging from rather general-purpose appetites and emotions to highly specific cognitive features. Cognitive features must be substantially built by social and individual learning to be compatible with the vast cultural diversity we observe in space and over time. At the same time gene-based components of reinforcement keep culture generally on track of genetic fitness. This essay asks whether the available neuroscientific evidence on brain function is more compatible with this cultural niche hypothesis or the much more directly gene-based cognitive niche alternative. Future neuroscience may provide a complete proximate account of the biological foundations of culture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)390-405
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Cognition and Culture
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Keywords

  • brain
  • culture
  • evolution
  • mind
  • neurobiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Sort of Mind/Brain Is Compatible with Cultural Adaptation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this